Suppr超能文献

在老年转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中,氟嘧啶联合贝伐单抗、奥沙利铂或伊立替康的疗效。

Impact of the addition of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan to fluoropyrimidin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients.

作者信息

Landre Thierry, Maillard Emilie, Taleb Chérifa, Ghebriou Djamel, Guetz Gaetan Des, Zelek Laurent, Aparicio Thomas

机构信息

Geriatric Oncology Coordination Unit - UCOG 93, APHP, René Muret Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Sevran, France.

FRancilian Oncogeriatric Group (FROG), Argenteuil, France.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3053-3. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The clinical benefit of double-front-line therapy (including oxaliplatin or irinotecan or bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine) compared to monotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) in elderly (> 70 years) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The selection of the studies was carried out using PubMed with the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "elderly," "oxaliplatin," "irinotecan," "bevacizumab," "survival." The efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected from the studies and pooled. By convention, an HR < 1 was a result in favor of biotherapy.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis (MA) included ten studies: three assessing irinotecan (FFCD 2001-02, CAIRO, and an already published MA by Folprecht), three assessing oxaliplatin (FOCUS2, FFCD 2000-05, and a published study by De Gramont), and four assessing bevacizumab (PRODIGE-20, AVEX, AGITG-MAX, and "AVF2192g" by Kabbinavar). Our MA included 1652 patients (62% of men). Concerning age, we chose a cut-off of 70 years or a cut-off of 75 years, corresponding to the available data for each study. The performance index (PS) was 0-1 for about 90% of patients, with the exception of FFCD 2001-02 and FOCUS2 which included 30% of patients with PS2. Overall, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin statistically improves both OS and PFS (HR = 0.78; CI 0.63-0.96 and HR = 0.55; CI 0.44-0.67, respectively). The addition of oxaliplatin did not statistically improve OS (= 0.99; CI 0.85-1.17) but improves PFS (HR = 0.81; CI 0.67-0.97) as well as the addition of irinotecan (HR = 1.01; CI 0.84-1.22 and HR = 0.82; CI 0.68-1.00, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In previously untreated elderly patients with MCRC, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin appears more effective in terms of OS or PFS than the addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan.

摘要

引言

对于老年(>70岁)转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)患者,双药一线治疗(包括奥沙利铂或伊立替康或贝伐单抗加5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)或卡培他滨)与单药治疗(5FU或卡培他滨)相比的临床获益存在争议。我们对已发表的随机研究进行了荟萃分析。

材料与方法

使用PubMed以以下关键词进行研究筛选:“转移性结直肠癌”、“老年”、“奥沙利铂”、“伊立替康”、“贝伐单抗”、“生存”。疗效终点为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。从各研究中收集危险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI)并进行汇总。按照惯例,HR<1表示支持生物治疗的结果。

结果

该荟萃分析(MA)纳入了10项研究:3项评估伊立替康(FFCD 2001 - 02、CAIRO以及Folprecht之前发表的一项MA),3项评估奥沙利铂(FOCUS2、FFCD 2000 - 05以及De Gramont发表的一项研究),4项评估贝伐单抗(PRODIGE - 20、AVEX、AGITG - MAX以及Kabbinavar的“AVF2192g”)。我们的MA纳入了1652例患者(62%为男性)。关于年龄,我们根据每项研究的可用数据选择70岁或75岁作为截断值。约90%患者的体能状态评分(PS)为0 - 1,FFCD 2001 - 02和FOCUS2除外,这两项研究中30%的患者PS评分为2。总体而言,氟嘧啶类药物联合贝伐单抗在统计学上显著改善了OS和PFS(HR分别为0.78;CI 0.63 - 0.96和HR为0.55;CI 0.44 - 0.67)。奥沙利铂的加入在统计学上未改善OS(HR = 0.99;CI 0.85 - 1.17),但改善了PFS(HR = 0.81;CI 0.67 - 0.97),伊立替康的加入情况类似(HR分别为1.01;CI 0.84 - 1.22和HR为0.82;CI 0.68 - 1.00)。

结论

在既往未接受治疗的老年MCRC患者中,氟嘧啶类药物联合贝伐单抗在OS或PFS方面似乎比联合奥沙利铂或伊立替康更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验