Landre Thierry, Maillard Emilie, Taleb Chérifa, Ghebriou Djamel, Guetz Gaetan Des, Zelek Laurent, Aparicio Thomas
Geriatric Oncology Coordination Unit - UCOG 93, APHP, René Muret Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Sevran, France.
FRancilian Oncogeriatric Group (FROG), Argenteuil, France.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):1125-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3053-3. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
The clinical benefit of double-front-line therapy (including oxaliplatin or irinotecan or bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine) compared to monotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) in elderly (> 70 years) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized studies.
The selection of the studies was carried out using PubMed with the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "elderly," "oxaliplatin," "irinotecan," "bevacizumab," "survival." The efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected from the studies and pooled. By convention, an HR < 1 was a result in favor of biotherapy.
This meta-analysis (MA) included ten studies: three assessing irinotecan (FFCD 2001-02, CAIRO, and an already published MA by Folprecht), three assessing oxaliplatin (FOCUS2, FFCD 2000-05, and a published study by De Gramont), and four assessing bevacizumab (PRODIGE-20, AVEX, AGITG-MAX, and "AVF2192g" by Kabbinavar). Our MA included 1652 patients (62% of men). Concerning age, we chose a cut-off of 70 years or a cut-off of 75 years, corresponding to the available data for each study. The performance index (PS) was 0-1 for about 90% of patients, with the exception of FFCD 2001-02 and FOCUS2 which included 30% of patients with PS2. Overall, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin statistically improves both OS and PFS (HR = 0.78; CI 0.63-0.96 and HR = 0.55; CI 0.44-0.67, respectively). The addition of oxaliplatin did not statistically improve OS (= 0.99; CI 0.85-1.17) but improves PFS (HR = 0.81; CI 0.67-0.97) as well as the addition of irinotecan (HR = 1.01; CI 0.84-1.22 and HR = 0.82; CI 0.68-1.00, respectively).
In previously untreated elderly patients with MCRC, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin appears more effective in terms of OS or PFS than the addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan.
对于老年(>70岁)转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)患者,双药一线治疗(包括奥沙利铂或伊立替康或贝伐单抗加5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)或卡培他滨)与单药治疗(5FU或卡培他滨)相比的临床获益存在争议。我们对已发表的随机研究进行了荟萃分析。
使用PubMed以以下关键词进行研究筛选:“转移性结直肠癌”、“老年”、“奥沙利铂”、“伊立替康”、“贝伐单抗”、“生存”。疗效终点为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。从各研究中收集危险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI)并进行汇总。按照惯例,HR<1表示支持生物治疗的结果。
该荟萃分析(MA)纳入了10项研究:3项评估伊立替康(FFCD 2001 - 02、CAIRO以及Folprecht之前发表的一项MA),3项评估奥沙利铂(FOCUS2、FFCD 2000 - 05以及De Gramont发表的一项研究),4项评估贝伐单抗(PRODIGE - 20、AVEX、AGITG - MAX以及Kabbinavar的“AVF2192g”)。我们的MA纳入了1652例患者(62%为男性)。关于年龄,我们根据每项研究的可用数据选择70岁或75岁作为截断值。约90%患者的体能状态评分(PS)为0 - 1,FFCD 2001 - 02和FOCUS2除外,这两项研究中30%的患者PS评分为2。总体而言,氟嘧啶类药物联合贝伐单抗在统计学上显著改善了OS和PFS(HR分别为0.78;CI 0.63 - 0.96和HR为0.55;CI 0.44 - 0.67)。奥沙利铂的加入在统计学上未改善OS(HR = 0.99;CI 0.85 - 1.17),但改善了PFS(HR = 0.81;CI 0.67 - 0.97),伊立替康的加入情况类似(HR分别为1.01;CI 0.84 - 1.22和HR为0.82;CI 0.68 - 1.00)。
在既往未接受治疗的老年MCRC患者中,氟嘧啶类药物联合贝伐单抗在OS或PFS方面似乎比联合奥沙利铂或伊立替康更有效。