Suppr超能文献

木匠蚁探索活动中的个体差异与认知判断偏差有关。

Individual differences in exploratory activity relate to cognitive judgement bias in carpenter ants.

作者信息

d'Ettorre Patrizia, Carere Claudio, Demora Lara, Le Quinquis Pauline, Signorotti Lisa, Bovet Dalila

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental and Comparative Ethology (LEEC), University of Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.

Laboratory of Experimental and Comparative Ethology (LEEC), University of Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

Abstract

Emotional state may influence cognitive processes such as attention and decision-making. A cognitive judgement bias is the propensity to anticipate either positive or negative consequences in response to ambiguous information. Recent work, mainly on vertebrates, showed that the response to ambiguous stimuli might change depending on an individual's affective state, which is influenced by e.g. the social and physical environment. However, the response to ambiguous stimuli could also be affected by the individual's behavioural type (personality), a question that has been under-investigated. We studied the link between individual differences in exploratory activity and the response to an ambiguous stimulus in the ant Camponotus aethiops. Exploratory behaviour, quantified with an open-field test, was variable among individuals but consistent over time within individuals. Individual ants learned to associate a spatial position to a reinforcement and another spatial position to a punishment. Once the ants had acquired this discrimination, cognitive judgement bias was tested with the stimulus in an intermediate position. Fast explorers in the open-field took significantly more time to approach the ambiguous stimulus compared to slow explorers, suggesting a negative judgement bias for fast explorers and a positive bias for slow explorers. This previously unknown link between individual difference in exploratory activity and cognitive bias in a social insect may help understanding the evolution and organization of social life.

摘要

情绪状态可能会影响诸如注意力和决策等认知过程。认知判断偏差是指在面对模糊信息时倾向于预期积极或消极后果的一种倾向。最近的研究工作,主要针对脊椎动物,表明对模糊刺激的反应可能会因个体的情感状态而改变,而情感状态会受到例如社会和物理环境的影响。然而,对模糊刺激的反应也可能受到个体行为类型(个性)的影响,而这个问题一直未得到充分研究。我们研究了黄猄蚁(Camponotus aethiops)探索活动的个体差异与对模糊刺激的反应之间的联系。通过旷场试验量化的探索行为在个体之间存在差异,但在个体内部随时间保持一致。个体蚂蚁学会将一个空间位置与奖励联系起来,将另一个空间位置与惩罚联系起来。一旦蚂蚁学会了这种辨别,就用处于中间位置的刺激来测试认知判断偏差。与慢探索者相比,旷场试验中的快探索者接近模糊刺激所需的时间明显更长,这表明快探索者存在消极判断偏差,而慢探索者存在积极偏差。社会昆虫探索活动的个体差异与认知偏差之间这种此前未知的联系,可能有助于理解社会生活的进化和组织。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验