Risch L, Cassel M, Messerschmidt J, Intziegianni K, Fröhlich K, Kopinski S, Mayer F
University Outpatient Clinic, Sports Medicine and Sports Orthopaedics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Ultrasound Int Open. 2016 Mar;2(1):E13-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569286. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the consistency between different Doppler ultrasound (DU) modes as well as the intra- and inter-observer reliability of investigators with different experience level in assessing intratendinous blood flow (IBF) in Achilles tendinopathy patients.
18 participants (36 Achilles tendons, AT) with Achilles tendinopathy (24 AT) were examined with power Doppler ultrasound (PDU), colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and "Advanced Dynamic Flow" (ADF) (Toshiba Xario SSA-660 A; 14MHz transducer) by 2 investigators (experienced, EI; inexperienced, II) in a test-retest design (M1/M2). A modified Öhberg score was used to quantify IBF. Data was analysed descriptively (absolute and relative). Consistency of the 3 modes was presented by Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (Kendall's W). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were calculated by use of Kendall's tau b correlation coefficient.
IBF was detected in 79-92% of symptomatic AT and in 33-50% of contralateral asymptomatic AT. Comparing the 3 modes, Kendall's W ranged from 0.97-0.98. Analysis of intra-observer reliability resulted in Kendall's tau 0.90-0.92 for EI and 0.84-0.87 for II. Inter-observer reliability resulted in Kendall's tau 0.64-0.69 in M1 and 0.68-0.70 in M2.
The very good consistency between PDU, CDU and ADF indicates a comparable applicability for assessing IBF in ATs. Intra-observer reliability was high for both investigators, independent of experience. The moderate inter-observer reliability reflects the challenge in sonographic detection of intratendinous blood flow (IBF) amount.
本研究旨在调查不同多普勒超声(DU)模式之间的一致性,以及不同经验水平的研究者在评估跟腱病患者肌腱内血流(IBF)时的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
18名患有跟腱病的参与者(36条跟腱,AT)(其中24条跟腱患病),由2名研究者(经验丰富者,EI;经验不足者,II)采用功率多普勒超声(PDU)、彩色多普勒超声(CDU)和“高级动态血流”(ADF)(东芝Xario SSA - 660 A;14MHz探头)进行重测设计(M1/M2)检查。采用改良的Öhberg评分来量化IBF。对数据进行描述性分析(绝对和相对)。通过肯德尔和谐系数(肯德尔W)来呈现三种模式的一致性。使用肯德尔tau b相关系数计算观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
在79% - 92%的有症状跟腱中检测到IBF,在33% - 50%的对侧无症状跟腱中检测到IBF。比较三种模式,肯德尔W范围为0.97 - 0.98。观察者内可靠性分析得出,EI的肯德尔tau为0.90 - 0.92,II的为0.84 - 0.87。观察者间可靠性在M1中得出肯德尔tau为0.64 - 0.69,在M2中为0.68 - 0.70。
PDU、CDU和ADF之间非常好的一致性表明它们在评估跟腱中IBF方面具有可比的适用性。两名研究者的观察者内可靠性都很高,与经验无关。中等的观察者间可靠性反映了超声检测肌腱内血流(IBF)量的挑战。