Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von- Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Praxiszentrum Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Sep;25(3):295-302. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.253.mag.
Split-dose regimens are generally recommended for bowel cleansers. However, other regimens still remain in the summary of product characteristics of some bowel cleansers in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a split-dose regimen of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) with a prior-day schedule (AM/PM).
Multicenter, randomized (EudraCT no. 2013-001620-20), endoscopist-blinded, parallel study, carried out in subjects 18 years or older undergoing elective colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the bowel cleansing assessment using a binary transformation (adequate/inadequate) of the Global Preparation Assessment (GPA) scale. Additional parameters analyzed were the segmental assessment of bowel cleansing (RSS), the adenoma detection rate and safety evaluations.
315 subjects comprised the ITT set. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the split-dose regimen had an adequate bowel preparation (AM/PM: 30.8% vs split-dose: 79.9%; p<0.0001). The mean global RSS was significantly lower in the split-dose group (AM/PM: 5.0 [SD: 2.91] vs split-dose: 2.6 [SD: 2.14]; p<0.0001). Flat polyps were detected in a higher proportion of subjects in the split-dose group compared with the AM/PM group (AM/PM: 16.0% vs split-dose: 22.0%). Both regimens were equally safe and well tolerated, with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events.
A split-dose regimen of SPMC is superior to the AM/PM regimen administered the day before colonoscopy. Split regimen of SPMC should be considered the standard of use.
分剂量方案通常被推荐用于肠道清洁剂。然而,在欧洲的一些肠道清洁剂的产品特性摘要中,仍然存在其他方案。本研究的目的是比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁(SPMC)分剂量方案与前一天方案(AM/PM)的疗效和安全性。
多中心、随机(EudraCT 编号 2013-001620-20)、内镜医师盲法、平行研究,在 18 岁或以上接受择期结肠镜检查的受试者中进行。主要终点是使用全球准备评估(GPA)量表的二元转换(充分/不充分)来评估肠道清洁度。分析的其他参数包括肠道清洁的节段评估(RSS)、腺瘤检出率和安全性评价。
315 名受试者纳入意向治疗集。分剂量组有更高比例的患者具有充分的肠道准备(AM/PM:30.8% vs 分剂量:79.9%;p<0.0001)。分剂量组的平均全球 RSS 显著较低(AM/PM:5.0 [SD:2.91] vs 分剂量:2.6 [SD:2.14];p<0.0001)。与 AM/PM 组相比,分剂量组中检测到更多的扁平息肉(AM/PM:16.0% vs 分剂量:22.0%)。两种方案均同样安全且耐受良好,无严重治疗相关不良事件或因不良事件而停药。
SPMC 的分剂量方案优于结肠镜检查前一天的 AM/PM 方案。SPMC 的分剂量方案应被视为标准使用方案。