• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚乙二醇电解质散/枸橼酸镁钠(SPMC)分次方案(晚一次法)与前日方案(早晚法)用于结肠镜检查准备的对比:一项随机单盲研究。

Superiority of a Split-dose Regimen of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) in Comparison to a Prior-day Schedule (AM/PM) for Colonoscopy Preparation. A Randomized Single-blinded Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von- Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Praxiszentrum Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Sep;25(3):295-302. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.253.mag.

DOI:10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.253.mag
PMID:27689192
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Split-dose regimens are generally recommended for bowel cleansers. However, other regimens still remain in the summary of product characteristics of some bowel cleansers in Europe. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a split-dose regimen of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) with a prior-day schedule (AM/PM).

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized (EudraCT no. 2013-001620-20), endoscopist-blinded, parallel study, carried out in subjects 18 years or older undergoing elective colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the bowel cleansing assessment using a binary transformation (adequate/inadequate) of the Global Preparation Assessment (GPA) scale. Additional parameters analyzed were the segmental assessment of bowel cleansing (RSS), the adenoma detection rate and safety evaluations.

RESULTS

315 subjects comprised the ITT set. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the split-dose regimen had an adequate bowel preparation (AM/PM: 30.8% vs split-dose: 79.9%; p<0.0001). The mean global RSS was significantly lower in the split-dose group (AM/PM: 5.0 [SD: 2.91] vs split-dose: 2.6 [SD: 2.14]; p<0.0001). Flat polyps were detected in a higher proportion of subjects in the split-dose group compared with the AM/PM group (AM/PM: 16.0% vs split-dose: 22.0%). Both regimens were equally safe and well tolerated, with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A split-dose regimen of SPMC is superior to the AM/PM regimen administered the day before colonoscopy. Split regimen of SPMC should be considered the standard of use.

摘要

背景和目的

分剂量方案通常被推荐用于肠道清洁剂。然而,在欧洲的一些肠道清洁剂的产品特性摘要中,仍然存在其他方案。本研究的目的是比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁(SPMC)分剂量方案与前一天方案(AM/PM)的疗效和安全性。

方法

多中心、随机(EudraCT 编号 2013-001620-20)、内镜医师盲法、平行研究,在 18 岁或以上接受择期结肠镜检查的受试者中进行。主要终点是使用全球准备评估(GPA)量表的二元转换(充分/不充分)来评估肠道清洁度。分析的其他参数包括肠道清洁的节段评估(RSS)、腺瘤检出率和安全性评价。

结果

315 名受试者纳入意向治疗集。分剂量组有更高比例的患者具有充分的肠道准备(AM/PM:30.8% vs 分剂量:79.9%;p<0.0001)。分剂量组的平均全球 RSS 显著较低(AM/PM:5.0 [SD:2.91] vs 分剂量:2.6 [SD:2.14];p<0.0001)。与 AM/PM 组相比,分剂量组中检测到更多的扁平息肉(AM/PM:16.0% vs 分剂量:22.0%)。两种方案均同样安全且耐受良好,无严重治疗相关不良事件或因不良事件而停药。

结论

SPMC 的分剂量方案优于结肠镜检查前一天的 AM/PM 方案。SPMC 的分剂量方案应被视为标准使用方案。

相似文献

1
Superiority of a Split-dose Regimen of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) in Comparison to a Prior-day Schedule (AM/PM) for Colonoscopy Preparation. A Randomized Single-blinded Study.聚乙二醇电解质散/枸橼酸镁钠(SPMC)分次方案(晚一次法)与前日方案(早晚法)用于结肠镜检查准备的对比:一项随机单盲研究。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Sep;25(3):295-302. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.253.mag.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and acceptability of split- and standard-dose sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.比较分剂量和标准剂量的聚乙二醇硫酸钠加枸橼酸镁用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和可接受性的随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2014 Aug;46(8):662-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365800. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
3
A randomized trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate solution vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol solution as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.一项比较比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁溶液与4升聚乙二醇溶液作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效和耐受性的随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;30(10):1407-16. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2307-6. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
4
A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.一项随机、内镜医师盲法、前瞻性试验,比较四种结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的偏好性和有效性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):871-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.910543. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
5
Split-dose sodium picosulfate-magnesium citrate colonoscopy preparation achieves lower residual gastric volume with higher cleansing effectiveness than a previous-day regimen.分次服用的聚乙二醇4000-枸橼酸镁结肠镜检查准备方案比前一天的方案能实现更低的胃残余量,且清洁效果更好。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.054. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial.结肠镜检查前4升聚乙二醇与小容量溶液的直接比较:哪种最佳?一项多中心随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1763-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2901-x. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
7
A single or split dose picosulphate/magnesium citrate before colonoscopy: comparison regarding tolerance and efficacy with polyethylene glycol. A randomized trial.结肠镜检查前单次或分次服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:与聚乙二醇在耐受性和疗效方面的比较。一项随机试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.vk1.
8
Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.个体化结肠镜肠道准备方案的时间到了吗?一项比较匹克硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与 4 升分剂量聚乙二醇的随机对照试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
9
[Split-dose sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate for morning colonoscopies performed 2 to 6 hours after fluid intake].分剂量服用的比沙可啶钠/枸橼酸镁用于液体摄入后2至6小时进行的上午结肠镜检查
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;36(4):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
10
Single-day sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate versus split-dose polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: A prospective randomized endoscopist-blinded trial.结肠镜检查前肠道准备:单日服用匹可硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与分剂量服用聚乙二醇的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机内镜医师盲法试验
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1627-34. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13010.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.影响结肠镜检查困难患者肠道准备质量的因素:来自文献的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685.
2
Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查用肠道清洁剂的新领域。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 7;27(45):7748-7770. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7748.
3
Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
超低容量(≤1 升)肠道准备液的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):13-32. doi: 10.1111/den.14015. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials.它在临床实践中有效吗?临床实践中结肠镜检查肠道准备效果与部分前瞻性试验疗效的比较。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;3(3):111-119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070. Epub 2019 Feb 12.