• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陶瓷对陶瓷与金属对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术的噪声特征:一项对比研究。

Noise characteristics in ceramic-on-ceramic vs. metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study.

作者信息

Robinson Patrick G, Anthony Ian, Kumar Sudeep, Jones Bryn, Stark Andrew, Ingram Roland

机构信息

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - UK.

Orthopaedic Research Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow - UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2016 Sep 29;26(5):492-497. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000383. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

DOI:10.5301/hipint.5000383
PMID:27689505
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A comparison of noise in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was undertaken. Noise associated with MoP implants is rarely reported and has not been linked to squeaking.

METHODS

A noise characterising hip questionnaire and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was sent to 1,000 THA patients; there were 509 respondents 282 CoC and 227 MoP; mean age 63.7 years (range 45-92 years), mean follow up 33 months (range 6-156 months).

RESULTS

Of 282 repsondents 47 (17%) of the CoC patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MoP patients (p = 0.048); 9 CoC patients and 4 MoP patients reported squeaking. Overall, 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it and patients with noisy hips scored on average 5 points less on the OHS (CoC: p = 0.04 and MoP: p = 0.007).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to report squeaking from MoP THAs. The squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to CoC THAs. Noisy hip implants may have social implications, and patients should be aware of this. We have shown a relationship between noise and a lower OHS. However, longer follow-up is needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant.

摘要

引言

对全髋关节置换术(THA)后陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)轴承和金属对聚乙烯(MoP)轴承中的噪音进行了比较。与MoP植入物相关的噪音鲜有报道,且未与吱吱声联系起来。

方法

向1000名THA患者发送了一份关于髋关节噪音特征的问卷和牛津髋关节评分(OHS);有509名受访者,其中282名使用CoC轴承,227名使用MoP轴承;平均年龄63.7岁(范围45 - 92岁),平均随访33个月(范围6 - 156个月)。

结果

在282名受访者中,47名(17%)CoC患者报告有噪音,而MoP患者中有19名(8%)报告有噪音(p = 0.048);9名CoC患者和4名MoP患者报告有吱吱声。总体而言,27%有噪音的患者表示因噪音而避免参加娱乐活动,髋关节有噪音的患者在OHS上的平均得分比无噪音患者低5分(CoC:p = 0.04,MoP:p = 0.007)。

讨论

这是第一项报告MoP全髋关节置换术出现吱吱声的研究。髋关节吱吱声现象并非CoC全髋关节置换术所特有。有噪音的髋关节植入物可能会产生社会影响,患者应该对此有所了解。我们已经表明噪音与较低的OHS之间存在关联。然而,需要更长时间的随访来确定噪音与功能不佳的植入物之间的联系。

相似文献

1
Noise characteristics in ceramic-on-ceramic vs. metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study.陶瓷对陶瓷与金属对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术的噪声特征:一项对比研究。
Hip Int. 2016 Sep 29;26(5):492-497. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000383. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
3
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
4
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
5
Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively?全髋关节置换术中不同类型的轴承及产生的噪音是否会影响术后与髋关节相关的疼痛、功能及生活质量?
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):567-574. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1225649. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
6
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.比较使用传统聚乙烯、金属对金属或陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的髋关节假体十年生存率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.
8
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?髋关节置换术中人工关节周围感染:感染与关节面类型之间存在关联吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y.
9
Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings.无骨水泥全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷和金属对聚乙烯轴承翻修风险的比较。
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):477-84. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?全髋关节置换术中的陶瓷对陶瓷轴承与降低晚期脱位翻修风险相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3790-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4395-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hybrid total hip arthroplasty. A median of 15 years follow-up.氧化铝陶瓷-陶瓷混合全髋关节置换术。中位数随访时间 15 年。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Aug;32(6):1127-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03087-w. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
2
Natural history of noise and squeaking in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.非骨水泥型陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术中异响与摩擦音的自然病程
J Orthop. 2020 Sep 19;21:544-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.09.009. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.