• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知控制机制在对情绪刺激的选择性注意中的作用。

The role of cognitive control mechanisms in selective attention towards emotional stimuli.

作者信息

Petrucci Manuel, Pecchinenda Anna

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1480-1492. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1233861. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2016.1233861
PMID:27690176
Abstract

The role of cognitive control mechanisms in reducing interference from emotionally salient distractors was investigated. In two experiments, participants performed a flanker task in which target-distractor affective compatibility and cognitive load were manipulated. Differently from past studies, targets and distractors were presented at separate spatial locations and cognitive load was not domain-specific. In Experiment 1, words (positive vs. negative) and faces (angry, happy or neutral faces), were used respectively as targets and distractors, whereas in Experiment 2, both targets (happy vs. angry) and distractors were faces. Findings showed interference from distractor processing only when cognitive load was high. The present findings indicate that, when targets and distractors are presented at different spatial locations, cognitive control mechanisms are involved in preventing interference from positive (Exp. 1) or negative distractors (Exp. 2). The role of stimulus valence and type is also discussed with regard to different patterns of interference observed.

摘要

研究了认知控制机制在减少来自情绪显著干扰物的干扰方面的作用。在两项实验中,参与者执行了一项侧翼任务,其中对目标-干扰物情感相容性和认知负荷进行了操纵。与以往的研究不同,目标和干扰物在不同的空间位置呈现,且认知负荷并非特定领域的。在实验1中,分别使用单词(积极与消极)和面孔(愤怒、快乐或中性面孔)作为目标和干扰物,而在实验2中,目标(快乐与愤怒)和干扰物均为面孔。研究结果表明,只有当认知负荷较高时,才会出现干扰物加工带来的干扰。目前的研究结果表明,当目标和干扰物在不同空间位置呈现时,认知控制机制参与防止来自积极干扰物(实验1)或消极干扰物(实验2)的干扰。还针对观察到的不同干扰模式讨论了刺激效价和类型的作用。

相似文献

1
The role of cognitive control mechanisms in selective attention towards emotional stimuli.认知控制机制在对情绪刺激的选择性注意中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1480-1492. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1233861. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals.工作记忆负荷对社交焦虑个体选择性关注情绪面孔的影响。
Psych J. 2024 Jun;13(3):477-485. doi: 10.1002/pchj.736. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load.受愉悦干扰:正性与负性效价对负荷下情绪捕获的影响
Emotion. 2016 Apr;16(3):328-37. doi: 10.1037/emo0000112. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
4
Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces.情绪-注意在分心面孔再认记忆中的相互作用。
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):207-15. doi: 10.1037/a0018487.
5
Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.当认知负荷和干扰项具有相似视觉特征时,低认知负荷会增强干扰项干扰,而高负荷则会减弱干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1659-73. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0866-9.
6
Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.无人关注的面部表情会不对称地影响非情感信息的同步处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1386-95. doi: 10.1162/0898929054985437.
7
The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions.工作记忆对视觉搜索情绪性面部表情的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1874-90. doi: 10.1037/a0037295. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
Modulation of selective attention by polarity-specific tDCS effects.极性特异性 tDCS 效应对选择性注意的调制。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.023. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
9
Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.工作记忆中忽略刺激表征的情感后果的认知行为和电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun;18(3):460-475. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0580-x.
10
Effects of anxiety and attention control on processing pictorial and linguistic emotional information.焦虑和注意控制对处理图像和语言情绪信息的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2009 May;47(5):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Preserved learning of implicit regularities with predictive social cues in older adults.老年人通过预测性社会线索对隐性规律的学习保持能力。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 10;15:1470649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1470649. eCollection 2024.
2
An IoT-based cognitive impairment detection device: A newly proposed method in older adults care-choice reaction time-device development and data-driven validation.一种基于物联网的认知障碍检测设备:老年人护理选择反应时间设备开发与数据驱动验证中的新方法。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 3;10:20552076241293597. doi: 10.1177/20552076241293597. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals.
工作记忆负荷对社交焦虑个体选择性关注情绪面孔的影响。
Psych J. 2024 Jun;13(3):477-485. doi: 10.1002/pchj.736. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
Altered processing of conflicting body representations in women with restrictive anorexia nervosa.限制型神经性厌食症女性对冲突身体表象的处理改变。
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1696-1709. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01788-3. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
5
The role of arousal and motivation in emotional conflict resolution: Implications for spinal cord injury.觉醒与动机在情绪冲突解决中的作用:对脊髓损伤的启示。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Oct 5;16:927622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.927622. eCollection 2022.
6
The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load.认知负荷下任务无关的威胁性刺激对定向和执行注意过程的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2022 May;113(2):412-433. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12540. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
7
It is not always positive: emotional bias in young and older adults.并非总是积极的:年轻人和老年人的情绪偏见。
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):2045-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01614-2. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
The Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised: Adaptation and Psychometric Properties in the Working Context of Malaysia.《执行技能问卷修订版:马来西亚工作环境下的适应与心理测量特性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178978.
9
Midfrontal-occipital θ-tACS modulates cognitive conflicts related to bodily stimuli.额中颞θ-tACS 调制与躯体刺激相关的认知冲突。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Feb 3;17(1):91-100. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa125.
10
Emotion first: children prioritize emotional faces in gaze-cued attentional orienting.情绪优先:儿童在目光引导的注意力定向中优先注意情绪面孔。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01237-8. Epub 2019 Aug 8.