• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用染色体异常风险增加的前瞻性妊娠队列对用于产前诊断的染色体微阵列进行验证。

Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.

作者信息

Wright Dale, Carey Louise, Battersby Siobhan, Nguyen Thuy, Clarke Melanie, Nash Benjamin, Gulesserian Elee, Cross Jill, Darmanian Artur

机构信息

Department of Cytogenetics, Sydney Genome Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital at Westmead , Westmead, Australia .

出版信息

Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016 Dec;20(12):791-798. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0117. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1089/gtmb.2016.0117
PMID:27690282
Abstract

AIM

Validation of a chromosomal microarray for improved prenatal diagnosis for chromosomal abnormalities among high-risk pregnancies.

METHODS

A cohort of 213 pregnancies was investigated by chromosomal microarray and the results were compared with quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), karyotype, and 850K single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray results. The detection limit of mosaicism was determined by assaying different trisomy mosaic constructs down to ∼12%. Imprecision estimates from replicates of mean log ratio values for a 200 kb deletion and 400 kb duplication were determined by evaluating the coefficient of variation (CV%).

RESULTS

Excluding pregnancies with aneuploidy, the chromosomal microarray detected 19/213 (8.9%) pregnancies with copy number abnormalities. These were classified as pathogenic in 11/213 (5.2%) cases, as variants of uncertain significance in 4/213 (1.9%) cases, and as likely benign in 4/213 (1.9%) cases. In 15/213 (7.0%) pregnancies, these abnormalities were not detectable by karyotype. Importantly, 8/11 (72.7%) of the pathogenic abnormalities detected by chromosomal microarray were only detectable by this modality. There were no false-positive results and only eight false-negative results. The chromosomal microarray showed excellent sensitivity (96.2%) and specificity (100.0%). The lower detection limit for mosaicism was ∼12%. Imprecision for the 0.2 Mb deletion (11.6 CV%) and 0.4 Mb duplication (5.9 CV%) was very low.

CONCLUSION

This chromosomal microarray showed excellent diagnostic performance with improved detection rates compared to karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis of clinically relevant fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

摘要

目的

验证染色体微阵列技术在高危妊娠中改善染色体异常产前诊断的效果。

方法

对213例妊娠进行染色体微阵列检测,并将结果与定量荧光聚合酶链反应(QF-PCR)、核型分析及850K单核苷酸多态性微阵列结果进行比较。通过检测低至约12%的不同三体镶嵌构建体来确定镶嵌现象的检测限。通过评估变异系数(CV%)来确定200 kb缺失和400 kb重复的平均对数比值值重复检测的不精密度估计值。

结果

排除非整倍体妊娠,染色体微阵列检测到19/213(8.9%)例妊娠存在拷贝数异常。其中11/213(5.2%)例被分类为致病性异常,4/213(1.9%)例为意义不明确的变异,4/213(1.9%)例可能为良性异常。在15/213(7.0%)例妊娠中,核型分析未检测到这些异常。重要的是,染色体微阵列检测到的8/11(72.7%)例致病性异常仅通过该方法可检测到。无假阳性结果,仅8例假阴性结果。染色体微阵列显示出极佳的敏感性(96.2%)和特异性(100.0%)。镶嵌现象的较低检测限约为12%。0.2 Mb缺失(CV%为11.6)和0.4 Mb重复(CV%为5.9)的不精密度非常低。

结论

与核型分析相比,这种染色体微阵列在临床相关胎儿染色体异常的产前诊断中显示出优异的诊断性能,检测率有所提高。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.使用染色体异常风险增加的前瞻性妊娠队列对用于产前诊断的染色体微阵列进行验证。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016 Dec;20(12):791-798. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0117. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency using an approach based on quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and genomic microarray.采用基于定量荧光聚合酶链反应和基因组微阵列的方法对颈部半透明增厚胎儿进行产前诊断。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Feb;197:164-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.024. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the BACs-on-Beads™ assay versus karyotyping for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective consecutive case series.用于产前检测染色体异常的 BACs-on-Beads™ 检测法与核型分析的诊断准确性:一项回顾性连续病例系列研究
BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(10):1245-52. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12873. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
4
Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.使用拷贝数变异测序对中国 3429 例羊水穿刺样本进行前瞻性染色体分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):287.e1-287.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.微阵列检测在妊娠丢失中的诊断效用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):478-86. doi: 10.1002/uog.14866. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
[Prenatal diagnosis of women with an adverse reproductive history using both traditional karyotyping and SNP-array].[采用传统核型分析和单核苷酸多态性微阵列技术对有不良生育史的女性进行产前诊断]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;53(3):155-159. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2018.03.003.
7
Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.染色体微阵列分析的产前诊断。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Feb;109(2):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.005.
8
Rapid aneuploidy testing (knowing less) versus traditional karyotyping (knowing more) for advanced maternal age: what would be missed, who should decide?高龄孕产妇的快速非整倍体检测(了解较少)与传统核型分析(了解较多):会遗漏什么,应由谁来决定?
Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Feb;14(1):6-13.
9
Prenatal genetic diagnosis using microarray analysis in fetuses with congenital heart defects.应用微阵列分析技术对先天性心脏缺陷胎儿进行产前遗传学诊断。
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):376-82. doi: 10.1002/pd.2862. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Diagnostic performance of quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis in high-risk pregnancies after combined first-trimester screening.孕早期联合筛查后高危妊娠中定量荧光PCR分析的诊断性能
Dan Med J. 2014 Nov;61(11):A4964.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.胎儿畸形、动态异常和软指标的分子检测方法:诊断率与挑战——文献系统综述与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;12(3):575. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030575.
2
Medical Genetics for Practicing Obstetrician.妇产科医生实用医学遗传学
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Feb;70(1):6-11. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01257-9. Epub 2019 Aug 28.