von Wowern N, Stoltze K
Scand J Dent Res. 1978 May;86(3):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1978.tb01931.x.
A study is carried out to evaluate the possibility of obtaining a measure of bone mass and bone activity by histoquantitation on small jaw specimens. The material consisted of bone autopsy specimens from premolar regions of mandibles and regions above maxillary second incisors. Microradiograms of 100-micrometer-thick buccal-lingual ground sections were used. Quantitation of bone mass (bone area in percent), bone coarseness (total bone surface/bone area), and bone activity (resorption surfaces/total bone surface) was done in well-defined areas of cortical and trabecular bone by an electronic point-counting system. The analysis indicates that: (1) no further information or accuracy is obtained from measurements of large areas than of small areas of cortical or trabecular bone, (2) the bone mass in the buccal cortex anterior to the mental foramen is independent of side and state of dentition, and (3) maxillary specimens are unsuitable for quantitation of bone mass. A small bone specimen taken anterior to the mental foramen seems to be suitable for histoquantitation, when a reliable and representative measure of bone mass and bone activity in the mandible is desired for analysis of intermandibular differences.
开展了一项研究,以评估通过对小型颌骨标本进行组织定量分析来获取骨量和骨活性测量值的可能性。材料包括来自下颌前磨牙区域和上颌第二切牙上方区域的骨尸检标本。使用了厚度为100微米的颊舌向磨片的显微放射照片。通过电子点计数系统在皮质骨和小梁骨的明确区域对骨量(骨面积百分比)、骨粗糙度(总骨表面积/骨面积)和骨活性(吸收表面/总骨表面积)进行定量分析。分析表明:(1)对皮质骨或小梁骨的大面积测量与小面积测量相比,并未获得更多信息或更高的准确性;(2)颏孔前方颊侧皮质骨的骨量与牙列的侧别和状态无关;(3)上颌标本不适合进行骨量定量分析。当需要对下颌骨的骨量和骨活性进行可靠且具有代表性的测量以分析下颌骨间差异时,取自颏孔前方的小骨标本似乎适合进行组织定量分析。