Agostinelli Claudio, Gallamini Andrea, Stracqualursi Luisa, Agati Patrizia, Tripodo Claudio, Fuligni Fabio, Sista Maria Teresa, Fanti Stefano, Biggi Alberto, Vitolo Umberto, Rigacci Luigi, Merli Francesco, Patti Caterina, Romano Alessandra, Levis Alessandro, Trentin Livio, Stelitano Caterina, Borra Anna, Piccaluga Pier Paolo, Hamilton-Dutoit Stephen, Kamper Peter, Zaucha Jan Maciej, Małkowski Bogdan, Kulikowski Waldemar, Tajer Joanna, Subocz Edyta, Rybka Justyna, Steidl Christian, Broccoli Alessandro, Argnani Lisa, Gascoyne Randy D, d'Amore Francesco, Zinzani Pier Luigi, Pileri Stefano A
Haemopathology Section, Bologna University School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
Research, Innovation and Statistics Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Oct;3(10):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30108-9.
Early-interim fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scan after two ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) chemotherapy courses (PET-2) represents the most effective predictor of treatment outcome in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. We aimed to assess the predictive value of PET-2 combined with tissue biomarkers in neoplastic and microenvironmental cells for this disease.
We enrolled 208 patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma and treated with ABVD (training set), from Jan 1, 2002, to Dec 31, 2009, and validated the results in a fully matched independent cohort of 102 patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (validation set), enrolled from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2012. The inclusion criteria for both the training and validation sets were: the availability of a representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sample collected at diagnosis; treatment with ABVD with or without radiotherapy; baseline staging and interim restaging after two ABVD courses with FDG-PET; no treatment change based solely on interim PET result; and HIV-negative status. We used Cox multivariate analysis classification and regression tree (CART) to compare the predictive values of these markers with that of PET-2 and to assess the biomarkers' ability to correctly classify patients whose outcome was incorrectly predicted by PET-2.
In multivariate analysis, PET-2 was the only factor able to predict both progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 33·3 [95% CI 13·6-83·3]; p<0·0001) and overall survival (HR 31·3 [95% CI 3·7-58·9]; p=0·002). In the training set, no factor had a stronger adverse predictive value than a positive PET-2 scan and none was able to correctly reclassify PET-2 positive patients. In PET-2 negative patients, expression of CD68 (≥25%) and PD1 (diffuse or rosetting pattern) in microenvironmental cells, and STAT1 negativity in Hodgkin Reed Sternberg cells identified a subset of PET-2 negative patients with a 3 year progression-free survival significantly lower than that of the remaining PET-2 negative population (21 [64%] of 33 [95% CI 45·2-79·0] vs 130 [95%] of 137 [95% CI 89·4-97·7]; p<0·0001). These findings were reproduced in the validation set.
The CART algorithm correctly predicted the response to treatment in more than a half of patients who had a relapse or disease progression despite a negative PET-2 scan, thus increasing the negative predictive value of PET-2. In keeping with preliminary results from interim PET response adapted clinical trials of patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma, there might be a non-negligible proportion of treatment failures in the interim PET negative group treated with standard ABVD.
Italian Association for Cancer Research, Bologna Association against leukaemia, lymphoma and myeloma, and Bologna University.
在两个周期的阿霉素、博来霉素、长春花碱和达卡巴嗪(ABVD)化疗后进行早期中期氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)-PET扫描(PET-2)是经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗结果最有效的预测指标。我们旨在评估PET-2联合肿瘤细胞和微环境细胞中的组织生物标志物对该疾病的预测价值。
我们纳入了2002年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间接受ABVD治疗的208例经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤患者(训练集),并在2008年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间纳入的102例完全匹配的独立经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤患者队列(验证集)中验证结果。训练集和验证集的纳入标准为:诊断时可获得代表性的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋组织样本;接受ABVD治疗,联合或不联合放疗;两个周期ABVD化疗后进行基线分期和中期再分期,采用FDG-PET;不单纯基于中期PET结果改变治疗方案;HIV阴性。我们使用Cox多变量分析分类和回归树(CART)来比较这些标志物与PET-2的预测价值,并评估生物标志物对PET-2预测结果错误的患者进行正确分类的能力。
在多变量分析中,PET-2是唯一能够预测无进展生存期(风险比[HR] 33.3 [95% CI 13.6 - 83.3];p<0.0001)和总生存期(HR 31.3 [95% CI 3.7 - 58.9];p = 0.002)的因素。在训练集中,没有因素比PET-2扫描阳性具有更强的不良预测价值,也没有因素能够正确重新分类PET-2阳性患者。在PET-2阴性患者中,微环境细胞中CD68(≥25%)和PD1(弥漫或玫瑰花结样模式)的表达,以及霍奇金里德斯特恩伯格细胞中STAT1阴性,确定了一部分PET-2阴性患者,其3年无进展生存期显著低于其余PET-2阴性人群(33例中的21例[64%] [95% CI 45.2 - 79.0] vs 137例中的130例[95%] [95% CI 89.4 - 97.7];p<0.0001)。这些结果在验证集中得到了重现。
CART算法正确预测了超过一半尽管PET-2扫描阴性但仍复发或疾病进展患者的治疗反应,从而提高了PET-2的阴性预测价值。与晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中期PET反应适应性临床试验的初步结果一致,在接受标准ABVD治疗的中期PET阴性组中,可能存在不可忽视比例的治疗失败病例。
意大利癌症研究协会、博洛尼亚抗白血病、淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤协会以及博洛尼亚大学。