Eom Soyong, Caplan Rochelle, Berg Anne T
Epilepsy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA.
J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;179:233-239.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.096. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
To test whether the reported association between pediatric epilepsy and behavioral problems may be distorted by the use of parental proxy report instruments.
Children in the Connecticut Study of Epilepsy were assessed 8-9 years after their epilepsy diagnosis (time-1) with the parent-proxy Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) (ages 6-18 years) or the Young Adult Self-Report (≥18 years of age). For children <18 years of age, parents also completed the Child Health Questionnaire, which contains scales for impact of child's illness on the parents. The same study subjects completed the Adult Self-Report 6-8 years later (time-2). Sibling controls were also tested. Case-control differences were examined for evidence suggesting more behavioral problems in cases with epilepsy than in controls based on proxy- vs self-report measures.
At time-1, parent-proxy CBCL scores were significantly higher (worse) for cases than controls (n = 140 matched pairs). After adjustment for Child Health Questionnaire scales reflecting parent emotional and time impact, only 1 case-control difference on the CBCL remained significant. Self-reported Young Adult Self-Report scores did not differ between cases and controls (n = 42 pairs). At time-2, there were no significant self-reported case-control differences on the Adult Self-Report (n = 105 pairs).
Parent-proxy behavior measures appear to be influenced by the emotional impact of epilepsy on parents. This may contribute to apparent associations between behavioral problems and childhood epilepsy. Self-report measures in older adolescents (>18 years of age) and young adults do not confirm parental perceptions. Evidence suggesting more behavioral problems in children with epilepsy should be interpreted in light of the source of information.
检验所报告的小儿癫痫与行为问题之间的关联是否会因使用家长代理报告工具而被扭曲。
对康涅狄格癫痫研究中的儿童在癫痫诊断后8至9年(时间1)使用家长代理的儿童行为检查表(CBCL)(适用于6至18岁)或青年成人自评量表(≥18岁)进行评估。对于18岁以下的儿童,家长还需完成儿童健康问卷,其中包含有关儿童疾病对家长影响的量表。同一研究对象在6至8年后(时间2)完成成人自评量表。同时也对同胞对照进行了测试。基于代理报告与自我报告测量,检查病例对照差异,以寻找癫痫患儿比对照有更多行为问题的证据。
在时间1,病例组的家长代理CBCL评分显著高于对照组(更差)(n = 140对匹配对)。在对反映家长情绪和时间影响的儿童健康问卷量表进行调整后,CBCL上仅1个病例对照差异仍具有显著性。病例组和对照组的自我报告青年成人自评量表评分无差异(n = 42对)。在时间2,成人自评量表上自我报告的病例对照差异无显著性(n = 105对)。
家长代理行为测量似乎受到癫痫对家长情绪影响的作用。这可能导致行为问题与儿童癫痫之间出现明显关联。年龄较大的青少年(>18岁)和青年成人的自我报告测量结果并未证实家长的看法。关于癫痫患儿存在更多行为问题的证据应根据信息来源进行解读。