Suppr超能文献

一种使用替代标志来确定胸椎横突的新触诊方法的开发:一项体外研究。

Development of a new palpation method using alternative landmarks for the determination of thoracic transverse processes: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Pagé Isabelle, Descarreaux Martin, Sobczak Stéphane

机构信息

Département d'anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, CP. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G9A 5H7, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les affections neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, CP. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G9A 5H7, Canada.

Département des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, CP. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G9A 5H7, Canada; Groupe de Recherche sur les affections neuromusculosquelettiques (GRAN), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boul. des Forges, CP. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec, G9A 5H7, Canada.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Abstract

Palpation methods (PMs) have been proposed to guide clinicians in locating the thoracic transverse processes (TTPs). However, no studies have assessed the validity of TTPs palpation or the added value of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSU). The objectives of the present study were (1) to explore the validity of TTPs location using palpation as commonly performed by clinicians, (2) to develop an accurate and valid PM, and (3) to assess the added value of MSU. A standardized procedure was used on six cadavers. It consisted in the insertion of markers through the T3, T5, T6 and T8 TTPs and spinous processes, which were identified using palpation and MSU. First, a fresh cadaver was used to explore the validity of the common palpation method. Since poor validity was observed, one intermediate and a final PMs were tested on a total of five Thiel-embalmed specimens. A descriptive analysis was performed and agreement between MSU and the final PM was determined. The final PM led to the proper determination of all TTPs on three specimens with a mean error of 4 ± 1.8 mm in relation to the TTPs center. The coefficient of variations and root mean square errors were ≤0.15 and 0.21 mm, respectively. Bland-Altman plot showed no differences between palpation and MSU. In conclusion, this study reports the validity of a new PM using multiple landmarks to guide TTPs determination and for which MSU does not seem to add value in accuracy. These results may have important clinical implications for clinicians using palpation.

摘要

已经提出了触诊方法(PMs)来指导临床医生定位胸椎横突(TTPs)。然而,尚无研究评估TTPs触诊的有效性或肌肉骨骼超声(MSU)的附加价值。本研究的目的是:(1)探讨临床医生常用的触诊法定位TTPs的有效性;(2)开发一种准确有效的PM;(3)评估MSU的附加价值。对六具尸体采用了标准化程序。该程序包括通过T3、T5、T6和T8的TTPs及棘突插入标记物,这些标记物通过触诊和MSU来识别。首先,使用一具新鲜尸体来探究常用触诊法的有效性。由于观察到有效性较差,在总共五具经蒂尔氏防腐处理的标本上测试了一种中间PM和一种最终PM。进行了描述性分析,并确定了MSU与最终PM之间的一致性。最终PM在三个标本上正确确定了所有TTPs,相对于TTPs中心的平均误差为4±1.8毫米。变异系数和均方根误差分别≤0.15和0.21毫米。布兰德-奥特曼图显示触诊和MSU之间无差异。总之,本研究报告了一种使用多个标志点指导TTPs确定的新PM的有效性,并且MSU在准确性方面似乎没有附加价值。这些结果可能对使用触诊的临床医生具有重要的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验