• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰骨盆标志的手法触诊:一项效度研究。

Manual palpation of lumbo-pelvic landmarks: a validity study.

作者信息

Kilby Julia, Heneghan Nicola R, Maybury Mark

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.math.2011.08.008
PMID:21945296
Abstract

Manual palpation (MP) is commonly used for the assessment of patients with neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction. During assessment of lumbo-pelvic disorders in particular, it may be used not only to explore pain and resistance in the region, but also to evaluate the symmetry and movement quality of the area. Whilst reliability of MP has been extensively investigated, its validity remains relatively under researched. The aim of this study was to explore the accuracy of MP of lumbo-pelvic bony points. Ultrasound images of three bony landmarks [4th lumbar spinous process (L4), left and right posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS)] were acquired from models (n = 3) in the prone position and the points marked with an ultra-violet (UV) pen. Nine musculoskeletal physiotherapists were asked to identify the bony landmarks using MP. Measurements (mms) were taken between the UV marks and the palpators' marks. The mean error (standard deviation) (mm) for MP of L4, LPSIS, RPSIS were 15.63 (3.89), 20.07 (4.60), 20.59 (2.79) respectively. Bland and Altman analysis gave a mean value of 0.173, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -27.8 to 26.3. This study suggests that MP of specific lumbo-pelvic bony points has limited validity.

摘要

手法触诊(MP)常用于评估神经肌肉骨骼功能障碍患者。特别是在评估腰骶部疾病时,它不仅可用于探查该区域的疼痛和阻力,还可用于评估该区域的对称性和运动质量。虽然对手法触诊的可靠性已进行了广泛研究,但其有效性仍相对缺乏研究。本研究的目的是探讨腰骶部骨点手法触诊的准确性。从俯卧位的模型(n = 3)获取三个骨性标志[第4腰椎棘突(L4)、左右髂后上棘(PSIS)]的超声图像,并用紫外线(UV)笔标记这些点。九名肌肉骨骼物理治疗师被要求使用手法触诊来识别骨性标志。测量紫外线标记与触诊者标记之间的距离(毫米)。L4、左侧PSIS、右侧PSIS手法触诊的平均误差(标准差)(毫米)分别为15.63(3.89)、20.07(4.60)、20.59(2.79)。Bland和Altman分析得出平均值为0.173,95%一致性界限为-27.8至26.3。本研究表明,特定腰骶部骨点的手法触诊有效性有限。

相似文献

1
Manual palpation of lumbo-pelvic landmarks: a validity study.腰骨盆标志的手法触诊:一项效度研究。
Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
2
The use of pMRI to validate the identification of palpated bony landmarks.使用磁共振弹性成像(pMRI)来验证触诊骨性标志的识别。
Man Ther. 2013 Aug;18(4):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
3
Validity of palpation techniques for the identification of the spinous process L5.用于识别L5棘突的触诊技术的有效性
Man Ther. 2013 Aug;18(4):333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
4
Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.针对腰骶椎的整脊测试是否可靠且有效?一项系统的批判性文献综述。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106097.
5
Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5.一种用于识别C7和L5棘突的触诊技术的可靠性和有效性。
Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
6
Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation.可重复性和再现性:三组物理治疗师通过触诊定位脊柱节段的误差
Man Ther. 2003 Nov;8(4):223-32. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00017-1.
7
Comparing the anatomical consistency of the posterior superior iliac spine to the iliac crest as reference landmarks for the lumbopelvic spine: a retrospective radiological study.比较以髂后上棘和髂嵴作为腰骶骨盆脊柱参考标志的解剖学一致性:一项回顾性放射学研究。
Clin Anat. 2007 Oct;20(7):819-25. doi: 10.1002/ca.20531.
8
Sensitivity for palpating lumbopelvic soft- tissues and bony landmarks and its associated factors: A single-blinded diagnostic accuracy study.触诊腰骶部软组织和骨性标志的敏感性及其相关因素:一项单盲诊断准确性研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Aug 3;30(4):735-744. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150356.
9
Development of a new palpation method using alternative landmarks for the determination of thoracic transverse processes: An in vitro study.一种使用替代标志来确定胸椎横突的新触诊方法的开发:一项体外研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb;27:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.三种用于腰椎屈伸双倾角测量的地标法的可靠性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 May 20;16:121. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0578-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Static palpation ain't easy: Evaluating palpation precision using a topographical map of the lumbar spine as a reference.静态触诊不容易:使用腰椎的地形图谱作为参考来评估触诊的精确性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 30;19(5):e0304571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304571. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring 3D Pelvis Orientation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Athletes Engaged in Activities with and without Impact Loading and Non-Athletes.探索三维骨盆方向:一项针对参与有和无冲击负荷活动的运动员及非运动员的横断面研究。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Jan 4;9(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010019.
3
Validity of leg length measurement in the supine and standing position compared with pelvic survey X-ray after total hip arthroplasty.
全髋关节置换术后仰卧位和站立位与骨盆前后位 X 射线比较下肢长度测量的有效性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):433-438. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05014-6. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
4
Asymmetry of the pelvis in Polish young adults.波兰年轻成年人骨盆的不对称性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1148239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148239. eCollection 2023.
5
Gait Kinetic and Kinematic Changes in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients and the Effect of Manual Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.慢性下腰痛患者的步态动力学和运动学变化及手法治疗的效果:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 15;10(16):3593. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163593.
6
Spinal Palpation Error and Its Impact on Skin Marker-Based Spinal Alignment Measurement in Adult Spinal Deformity.脊柱触诊误差及其对成人脊柱畸形中基于皮肤标记点的脊柱对线测量的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 23;9:687323. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.687323. eCollection 2021.
7
The impact on anatomical landmark identification after an ultrasound-guided palpation intervention: a pilot study.超声引导下触诊干预对解剖标志识别的影响:一项初步研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Oct 23;27:47. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0269-4. eCollection 2019.
8
Would adopting a revised landmark rule for the spinal level of the iliac crests improve the accuracy of lumbar level identification?采用修订后的髂嵴脊柱水平标志性规则会提高腰椎水平识别的准确性吗?
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2019 Apr;63(1):26-35.
9
Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systematic review.测量整体矢状面平衡的非影像学方法:一项系统综述
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Oct 3;12:30. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0135-x. eCollection 2017.
10
How consistent are lordosis, range of movement and lumbo-pelvic rhythm in people with and without back pain?有背痛和无背痛人群的脊柱前凸、活动范围及腰骨盆节律的一致性如何?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 22;17(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1250-1.