Kumar Vinay V, Ebenezer Supriya, Kämmerer Peer W, Jacob P C, Kuriakose Moni A, Hedne Naveen, Wagner Wilfried, Al-Nawas Bilal
Head and Neck Institute (Head: Dr. Moni A. Kuriakose), Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Center, Narayana Health, Bommasandra, Bangalore, India; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Periodontics, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore, India.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Nov;44(11):1849-1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
The objective of this study was to assess the difference in success rates of implants when using two or four implant-supported-overdentures following segmental mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap.
This prospective, parallel designed, randomized clinical study was conducted with 1:1 ratio. At baseline, all participants already had segmental reconstruction of mandible with free fibula flap. The participants were randomized into two groups: Group-I received implant-supported-overdentures on two tissue-level implants and Group-II received implant-supported-overdentures on four tissue-level implants. Success rates of the implants were evaluated at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following implant loading using marginal bone level changes as well as peri-implant indices (Buser et al., 1990).
52 patients were randomized into two treatment groups (26 each), out of which 18 patients (36 implants) of Group-I and 17 patients (68 implants) of Group-II were evaluated. One implant in Group-I was lost due to infective complications and one patient in the same group had superior barrel necrosis. There was a statistically significant increase at both time points (p = 0.03, p = 0.04 at 6 months, 12 months) in the amount of marginal bone loss in Group-I (0.4 mm, 0.5 mm at 6 months, 12 months) as compared to Group-II (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm at 6 months, 12 months). There were no clinically significant changes peri-implant parameters between both groups. Peri-implant soft tissue hyperplasia was seen in both groups, 32% of implants at 3-months, 26% at 6-months and 3% at 12-months follow-up.
The results of this study show that patients with 2-implant-supported-overdentures had higher marginal bone loss as compared to patients with 4-implant-supported-overdentures. There were no clinically significant differences in peri-implant soft tissue factors in patients with 2- or 4-implant-supported-overdentures. Hyperplastic peri-implant tissues are common in the early implant-loading phase and tend to decrease over time under appropriate management.
本研究的目的是评估在游离腓骨瓣进行节段性下颌骨重建后,使用两颗或四颗种植体支持覆盖义齿时种植体成功率的差异。
本前瞻性、平行设计的随机临床研究按1:1比例进行。基线时,所有参与者均已接受游离腓骨瓣节段性下颌骨重建。参与者被随机分为两组:第一组在两颗组织水平种植体上接受种植体支持覆盖义齿,第二组在四颗组织水平种植体上接受种植体支持覆盖义齿。在种植体植入后3个月、6个月和12个月,使用边缘骨水平变化以及种植体周围指数(Buser等人,1990年)评估种植体的成功率。
52例患者被随机分为两个治疗组(每组26例),其中第一组18例患者(36颗种植体)和第二组17例患者(68颗种植体)接受评估。第一组有一颗种植体因感染并发症丢失,同一组有一名患者出现上颌桶状坏死。与第二组(6个月时0.1mm,12个月时0.2mm)相比,第一组(6个月时0.4mm,12个月时0.5mm)在两个时间点的边缘骨吸收量均有统计学显著增加(6个月和12个月时p分别为0.03和0.04)。两组种植体周围参数无临床显著变化。两组均可见种植体周围软组织增生,随访3个月时为32%的种植体,6个月时为26%,12个月时为3%。
本研究结果表明,与四颗种植体支持覆盖义齿的患者相比,两颗种植体支持覆盖义齿的患者边缘骨吸收更高。两颗或四颗种植体支持覆盖义齿的患者在种植体周围软组织因素方面无临床显著差异。种植体周围增生组织在种植体早期加载阶段很常见,在适当管理下会随时间减少。