Suppr超能文献

公开支付数据库:向眼科医生支付的抗血管内皮生长因子药物款项

Open Payments Database: Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agent Payments to Ophthalmologists.

作者信息

Singh Nakul, Chang Jonathan S, Rachitskaya Aleksandra V

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;173:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent-associated industry payments to ophthalmologists using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments and Provider Utilization and Payment data.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review using 2 national databases.

METHODS

Payments from 2013 to 2014 were analyzed by anti-VEGF agent, payment category, and dollar amount. Ranibizumab and aflibercept usage was correlated by performing log-ratio analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3207 ophthalmologists received 13 449 payments totaling $4 454 325 associated with ranibizumab and aflibercept. As 7% of ophthalmologists received 90% of payments, the Gini index was 0.92, demonstrating unequal distribution of payments. Consulting fees and speaker fees were associated with highest payment amounts to fewest providers. For 2383 providers (74%), greater than 90% of the anti-VEGF payments were associated exclusively with either ranibizumab or aflibercept. A total of 1382 ophthalmologists were matched in both databases. Providers receiving >90% of payments from ranibizumab were more likely to use ranibizumab, and those receiving >90% of payments from aflibercept were more likely to use aflibercept over bevacizumab as compared to those who received no payments.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of all anti-VEGF payments is unequal. Ophthalmologists who received aflibercept or ranibizumab payments were more likely to receive the majority of payments from one source or the other, but not both. Those who received anti-VEGF payments were more likely to use ranibizumab or aflibercept, as compared to off-label bevacizumab, than those who did not receive any payment.

摘要

目的

利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的公开支付数据以及提供者利用和支付数据,分析抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)药物相关行业向眼科医生的支付情况。

设计

使用两个国家数据库进行回顾性数据库审查。

方法

按抗VEGF药物、支付类别和金额分析2013年至2014年的支付情况。通过对数比率分析来关联雷珠单抗和阿柏西普的使用情况。

结果

共有3207名眼科医生收到了13449笔与雷珠单抗和阿柏西普相关的支付,总计4454325美元。由于7%的眼科医生收到了90%的支付款项,基尼系数为0.92,表明支付分配不均。咨询费和演讲费与支付金额最高但提供者最少相关。对于2383名提供者(74%),超过90%的抗VEGF支付仅与雷珠单抗或阿柏西普相关。两个数据库中共匹配到1382名眼科医生。与未收到支付款项的医生相比,从雷珠单抗获得超过90%支付的提供者更有可能使用雷珠单抗,从阿柏西普获得超过90%支付的提供者更有可能使用阿柏西普而非贝伐单抗。

结论

所有抗VEGF支付的分配是不平等的。收到阿柏西普或雷珠单抗支付的眼科医生更有可能从其中一个来源而非两个来源获得大部分支付款项。与未收到任何支付的医生相比,收到抗VEGF支付的医生更有可能使用雷珠单抗或阿柏西普,而非使用未获批准的贝伐单抗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验