Dias Filho Aderivaldo Cabral, Oliveira Rodrigues Ruytemberg, Riccetto Cassio L Z, Oliveira Paulo Gonçalves
Urological Unit, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brazil.
Urological Unit, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brazil.
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):811-817. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.087. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
We compared surgical outcomes between patients undergoing and those not undergoing preoperative manual detorsion for intravaginal testicular torsion.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients treated surgically for testicular torsion who were examined within 24 hours of symptoms at our emergency department between January 2012 and September 2015. Explanatory variables were age, presentation delay (time between symptoms and urological examination), surgical wait time (time from examination to surgery), and whether manual detorsion was attempted and, if attempted, was declared successful. End points were surgical outcome (orchiopexy, orchiectomy) and testicular rotation at surgery. Statistical analysis included nonparametric tests and logistic regression. Statistical significance and confidence intervals were set at p <0.05 and 0.95, respectively.
Detorsion was attempted in 76 of 133 cases (57.1%) and was successful in 72 (95.1%). Patient age (median 15.6 vs 17.4 years, p = 0.115), presentation delay (6.6 vs 6.3 hours, p = 1.0) and surgical wait time (3.5 vs 3.2 hours, p = 0.412) were comparable between patients who underwent manual detorsion attempt and those who did not. Testicular rotation was less among successfully detorsed patients. Orchiectomy was performed in 2 of 72 successfully detorsed patients (2.8%), compared to 15 of 61 patients (24.6%) in whom detorsion was not attempted or was unsuccessful (OR 11.23, p = 0.0002). Logistic regression indicated that surgical wait time (OR 0.95, p = 0.002) and successful detorsion (OR 17.38, p = 0.001) were independently associated with orchiopexy.
Preoperative manual detorsion was associated with improved surgical salvage in patients with testicular torsion.
我们比较了接受和未接受术前手法复位治疗的阴囊内睾丸扭转患者的手术结果。
我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2015年9月期间在我院急诊科出现症状后24小时内接受手术治疗的睾丸扭转连续患者。解释变量包括年龄、就诊延迟时间(症状出现至泌尿外科检查的时间)、手术等待时间(检查至手术的时间),以及是否尝试手法复位,若尝试,是否复位成功。终点指标为手术结果(睾丸固定术、睾丸切除术)及手术时睾丸扭转情况。统计分析包括非参数检验和逻辑回归。统计学显著性和置信区间分别设定为p<0.05和0.95。
133例患者中有76例(57.1%)尝试了复位,其中72例(95.1%)复位成功。尝试手法复位和未尝试手法复位的患者之间,患者年龄(中位数分别为15.6岁和17.4岁,p = 0.115)、就诊延迟时间(6.6小时和6.3小时,p = 1.0)及手术等待时间(3.5小时和3.2小时,p = 0.412)相当。成功复位患者的睾丸扭转程度较小。72例成功复位患者中有2例(2.8%)接受了睾丸切除术,而未尝试复位或复位未成功的61例患者中有15例(24.6%)接受了睾丸切除术(比值比11.23,p = 0.0002)。逻辑回归表明,手术等待时间(比值比0.95,p = 0.002)和成功复位(比值比17.38,p = 0.001)与睾丸固定术独立相关。
术前手法复位与睾丸扭转患者手术挽救率的提高相关。