• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全省范围内实施痛苦筛查对肿瘤学医护人员的信心和对以患者为中心的护理的理解的影响。

Effects of a Provincial-Wide Implementation of Screening for Distress on Healthcare Professionals' Confidence and Understanding of Person-Centered Care in Oncology.

机构信息

From CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Oct;14(10):1259-1266. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0135.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0135
PMID:27697980
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although published studies report that screening for distress (SFD) improves the quality of care for patients with cancer, little is known about how SFD impacts healthcare professionals (HCPs).

OBJECTIVES

This quality improvement project examined the impact of implementing the SFD intervention on HCPs' confidence in addressing patient distress and awareness of person-centered care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This project involved pre-evaluation and post-evaluation of the impact of implementing SFD. A total of 254 HCPs (cohort 1) were recruited from 17 facilities across the province to complete questionnaires. SFD was then implemented at all cancer care facilities over a 10-month implementation period, after which 157 HCPs (cohort 2) completed post-implementation questionnaires. At regional and community care centers, navigators supported the integration of SFD into routine practice; therefore, the impact of navigators was examined.

RESULTS

HCPs in cohort 2 reported significantly greater confidence in managing patients' distress and greater awareness about person-centered care relative to HCPs in cohort 1. HCPs at regional and community sites reported greater awareness in person-centeredness before and after the intervention, and reported fewer negative impacts of SFD relative to HCPs at tertiary sites. Caring for single or multiple tumor types was an effect modifier, with effects observed only in the HCPs treating multiple tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of SFD was beneficial for HCPs' confidence and awareness of person-centeredness. Factors comprising different models of care, such as having site-based navigators and caring for single or multiple tumors, influenced outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管已发表的研究报告表明,对患者的痛苦状况进行筛查(SFD)可以提高癌症患者的护理质量,但人们对 SFD 如何影响医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)知之甚少。

目的

本质量改进项目研究了实施 SFD 干预措施对 HCPs 处理患者痛苦和关注以患者为中心的护理的信心的影响。

患者和方法

该项目涉及实施 SFD 前后的影响评估。共从全省 17 个机构招募了 254 名 HCPs(队列 1)来完成问卷调查。在 10 个月的实施期内,在所有癌症护理机构实施 SFD 后,有 157 名 HCPs(队列 2)完成了实施后的问卷调查。在区域和社区护理中心,导航员支持将 SFD 纳入常规实践;因此,考察了导航员的影响。

结果

与队列 1 相比,队列 2 的 HCPs 在管理患者痛苦方面的信心显著增强,对以患者为中心的护理的认识也显著增强。区域和社区站点的 HCPs 在干预前后对以患者为中心的认识更高,并且报告 SFD 的负面影响相对较少与三级站点的 HCPs 相比。照顾单个或多个肿瘤类型是一个调节因素,仅在治疗多个肿瘤的 HCPs 中观察到效果。

结论

实施 SFD 对 HCPs 的信心和以患者为中心的意识有益。不同的护理模式构成因素,如基于站点的导航员和照顾单个或多个肿瘤,都影响了结果。

相似文献

1
Effects of a Provincial-Wide Implementation of Screening for Distress on Healthcare Professionals' Confidence and Understanding of Person-Centered Care in Oncology.全省范围内实施痛苦筛查对肿瘤学医护人员的信心和对以患者为中心的护理的理解的影响。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Oct;14(10):1259-1266. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0135.
2
A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline.实施补充医学实践指南后对肿瘤医护人员的知识、态度和实践进行的前后评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7487-7495. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06318-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
[The innovation characteristics of person-centred care as perceived by healthcare professionals: an interview study employing a deductive-inductive content analysis guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research.医护人员感知的以患者为中心的护理的创新特征:采用整合实施研究框架指导的演绎归纳内容分析的访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06942-y.
4
Communication and integration: a qualitative analysis of perspectives among Middle Eastern oncology healthcare professionals on the integration of complementary medicine in supportive cancer care.沟通与整合:对中东肿瘤医疗专业人员关于补充医学融入癌症支持性护理的观点进行定性分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 May;142(5):1117-26. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2120-9. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Provincial Implementation of Screening for Distress on Quality of Life, Symptom Reports, and Psychosocial Well-Being in Patients With Cancer.评估省级实施困境筛查对癌症患者生活质量、症状报告和心理社会福祉的影响。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Feb;14(2):164-72. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0019.
6
Diabetes care: Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' assessment using the PACIC instrument.糖尿病护理:使用患者激活护理指数(PACIC)工具对患者与医疗保健专业人员评估的比较
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):803-811. doi: 10.1111/jep.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Enrolment in paediatric oncology early-phase clinical trials: The health-care professionals' perspective.儿科肿瘤早期临床试验的入组情况:医护人员的观点。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 May;55(5):561-566. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14248. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Provider perspectives on PrEP for adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: The role of provider biases and quality of care.坦桑尼亚青少年和年轻女性中 PrEP 的提供者观点:提供者偏见和护理质量的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 27;13(4):e0196280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196280. eCollection 2018.
9
Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps.肿瘤学中的移动应用程序:医疗保健专业人员对远程医疗、移动健康和肿瘤学应用程序态度的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 24;18(11):e312. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6399.
10
Healthcare professional perspectives following implementation of an infection management care pathway for pediatric patients with cancer: a qualitative study.医疗机构专业人员对感染管理护理路径在癌症患儿中的应用的看法:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 4;32(7):405. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08612-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study of the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully Psychosocial Intervention Across Established Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Programs in Alberta's Calgary and South Zone.一项关于“管理癌症与有意义生活心理社会干预”的混合效果-实施研究,该研究覆盖了艾伯塔省卡尔加里市及南区已有的心理社会肿瘤学和姑息治疗项目。
Psychooncology. 2025 Aug;34(8):e70259. doi: 10.1002/pon.70259.
2
Person-centered care assessment tool with a focus on quality healthcare: a systematic review of psychometric properties.以关注优质医疗保健为重点的以人为本的护理评估工具:心理测量特性的系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;12(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01716-7.
3
Diving deeper into distress screening implementation in oncology care.
深入探讨肿瘤护理中困境筛查的实施。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(6):645-660. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2250774. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Reliability Generalization Study of the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool.以患者为中心的护理评估工具的信度概化研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;12:712582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712582. eCollection 2021.
5
Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in ambulatory oncology in Alberta: Digital reporting at the micro, meso and macro level.在艾伯塔省门诊肿瘤学中使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):微观、中观和宏观层面的数字报告
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Oct 12;5(Suppl 2):97. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00373-3.
6
Leveraging Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement via the Electronic Health Record to Connect Patients with Cancer to Smoking Cessation Treatment.利用电子健康记录中的患者报告结局测量结果将癌症患者与戒烟治疗联系起来。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):5034. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145034.
7
Patient-reported outcomes in Alberta: rationale, scope, and design of a database initiative.艾伯塔省患者报告结局:数据库计划的基本原理、范围和设计。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Aug;26(4):e503-e509. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4919. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Developing a Provincial Cancer Patient Navigation Program Utilizing a Quality Improvement Approach. Part Three: Evaluation and Outcomes.采用质量改进方法制定省级癌症患者导航计划。第三部分:评估与结果。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016 Oct 1;26(4):276-285. doi: 10.5737/23688076264276285. eCollection 2016 Fall.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016 Oct 1;26(4):286-296. doi: 10.5737/23688076264286296. eCollection 2016 Fall.
10
Assessing the utility of a distress screening tool at capturing sexual concerns in a gyne-oncology follow-up clinic.评估一种在妇科肿瘤随访门诊中捕捉性问题的困扰筛查工具的效用。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Mar;26(3):887-893. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3905-3. Epub 2017 Oct 6.