College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7487-7495. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06318-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Complementary medicine (CM) use is prevalent among cancer patients, yet it is often not assessed by oncology healthcare providers (HCPs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate oncology HCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding CM use before and after the implementation of a practice guideline focusing on standardizing assessment and documentation of CM.
Oncology HCPs across a provincial cancer agency were invited to participate in the study. The implementation strategy included an initial education session for HCPs and standardized CM assessment forms. Pre-post surveys assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to CM were completed by HCPs prior to attending the education session and following the 4-month implementation period. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences between baseline and follow-up surveys.
A total of 31 oncology HCPs completed both baseline and follow-up surveys, with over 3700 patient CM assessment forms being completed during the 4-month study period. At the end of the study, HCPs reported greater CM knowledge (p < 0.001), readiness to support cancer patients' CM decisions (p = 0.002), and willingness to consult with another HCP about CM (p = 0.004). No significant change in HCPs' reported attitudes towards CM, or other clinical practices related to CM were observed.
Implementing a practice guideline, including a CM education session and a standardized assessment form, was found to improve oncology HCPs' self-reported CM knowledge and readiness to answer cancer patients' questions about CM. The findings provide support for future knowledge translation research aimed at standardizing how CM is addressed within cancer care settings.
在癌症患者中,补充医学(CM)的应用很普遍,但肿瘤医疗保健提供者(HCP)通常并未对此进行评估。本研究的目的是评估在实施侧重于规范 CM 评估和记录的实践指南前后,肿瘤学 HCP 对 CM 使用的知识、态度和实践。
邀请省级癌症机构的肿瘤学 HCP 参与研究。实施策略包括为 HCP 举办初始教育课程和标准化 CM 评估表。HCP 在参加教育课程之前和实施 4 个月后完成了与 CM 相关的知识、态度和实践的预-后调查。采用配对 t 检验来确定基线和随访调查之间的差异。
共有 31 名肿瘤学 HCP 完成了基线和随访调查,在 4 个月的研究期间共完成了 3700 多份患者 CM 评估表。研究结束时,HCP 报告称 CM 知识有所增加(p<0.001),准备支持癌症患者的 CM 决策(p=0.002),并愿意就 CM 咨询其他 HCP(p=0.004)。未观察到 HCP 对 CM 的态度或与 CM 相关的其他临床实践有任何显著变化。
实施实践指南,包括 CM 教育课程和标准化评估表,发现可提高肿瘤学 HCP 自我报告的 CM 知识和准备回答癌症患者有关 CM 的问题的能力。这些发现为旨在规范癌症护理环境中如何处理 CM 的未来知识转化研究提供了支持。