King Gillian, Thomson Nicole, Rothstein Mitchell, Kingsnorth Shauna, Parker Kathryn
Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada.
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Oct 10;30(7):1140-1160. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2015-0177.
Purpose One of the major issues faced by academic health science centers (AHSCs) is the need for mechanisms to foster the integration of research, clinical, and educational activities to achieve the vision of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) and optimal client care. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach This paper synthesizes literature on organizational learning and collaboration, evidence-informed organizational decision making, and learning-based organizations to derive insights concerning the nature of effective workplace learning in AHSCs. Findings An evidence-informed model of collaborative workplace learning is proposed to aid the alignment of research, clinical, and educational functions in AHSCs. The model articulates relationships among AHSC academic functions and sub-functions, cross-functional activities, and collaborative learning processes, emphasizing the importance of cross-functional activities in enhancing collaborative learning processes and optimizing EIDM and client care. Cross-functional activities involving clinicians, researchers, and educators are hypothesized to be a primary vehicle for integration, supported by a learning-oriented workplace culture. These activities are distinct from interprofessional teams, which are clinical in nature. Four collaborative learning processes are specified that are enhanced in cross-functional activities or teamwork: co-constructing meaning, co-learning, co-producing knowledge, and co-using knowledge. Practical implications The model provides an aspirational vision and insight into the importance of cross-functional activities in enhancing workplace learning. The paper discusses the conceptual and empirical basis to the model, its contributions and limitations, and implications for AHSCs. Originality/value The model's potential utility for health care is discussed, with implications for organizational culture and the promotion of cross-functional activities.
目的 学术健康科学中心(AHSCs)面临的主要问题之一是需要建立机制,以促进研究、临床和教育活动的整合,从而实现循证决策(EIDM)的愿景并提供最佳的客户护理。本文旨在探讨这一问题。 设计/方法/途径 本文综合了关于组织学习与协作、循证组织决策以及学习型组织的文献,以得出有关AHSCs有效工作场所学习本质的见解。 研究结果 提出了一个循证协作式工作场所学习模型,以帮助协调AHSCs中的研究、临床和教育功能。该模型阐述了AHSC学术功能与子功能、跨职能活动以及协作学习过程之间的关系,强调了跨职能活动在加强协作学习过程以及优化EIDM和客户护理方面的重要性。假设涉及临床医生、研究人员和教育工作者的跨职能活动是整合的主要载体,并得到以学习为导向的工作场所文化的支持。这些活动与本质上属于临床性质的跨专业团队不同。明确了四个在跨职能活动或团队合作中得到加强的协作学习过程:共同构建意义、共同学习、共同生成知识和共同使用知识。 实际意义 该模型提供了一个理想的愿景,并深入了解了跨职能活动在加强工作场所学习方面的重要性。本文讨论了该模型的概念和实证基础、其贡献和局限性以及对AHSCs的影响。 原创性/价值 讨论了该模型在医疗保健方面的潜在效用,以及对组织文化和促进跨职能活动的影响。