Sales Jessica M, Swartzendruber Andrea, Phillips Ashley L
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd., NE, Room 570, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016 Dec;13(6):374-382. doi: 10.1007/s11904-016-0337-5.
The high prevalence of trauma and its negative impact on health and health-promoting behaviors underscore the need for multi-level interventions to address trauma and its associated sequelae to improve physical and mental well-being in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Growing global awareness of the intersection of trauma and HIV has resulted in development and testing of interventions to address trauma in the context of HIV treatment and HIV prevention in the USA and globally. Despite increasing recognition of the widespread nature of trauma and the importance of trauma to HIV transmission around the globe, several gaps remain. Through a survey of the literature, we identified eight studies (published in the past 5 years) describing interventions to address the effects of trauma on HIV-related outcomes. In particular, this study focused on the levels of intervention, populations the interventions were designed to benefit, and types of trauma addressed in the interventions in the context of both HIV prevention and treatment. Remarkably absent from the HIV prevention, interventions reviewed were interventions designed to address violence experienced by men or transgender individuals, in the USA or globally. Given the pervasive nature of trauma experienced generally, but especially among individuals at heightened risk for HIV, future HIV prevention interventions universally should consider becoming trauma-informed. Widespread acknowledgement of the pervasive impact of gender-based violence on HIV outcomes among women has led to multiple calls for trauma-informed care (TIC) approaches to improve the effectiveness of HIV services for HIV-infected women. TIC approaches may be relevant for and should also be tested among men and all groups with high co-occurring epidemics of HIV and trauma (e.g., men who have sex with men (MSM), transgendered populations, injection drug users, sex workers), regardless of type of trauma experience.
创伤的高发生率及其对健康和促进健康行为的负面影响凸显了采取多层次干预措施的必要性,以应对创伤及其相关后遗症,从而改善艾滋病毒感染者和未感染者的身心健康。全球范围内对创伤与艾滋病毒交叉问题的认识不断提高,促使美国和全球开展了相关干预措施的研发和测试,以在艾滋病毒治疗和预防背景下应对创伤。尽管人们越来越认识到创伤的普遍性以及创伤对全球艾滋病毒传播的重要性,但仍存在一些差距。通过对文献的调查,我们确定了八项研究(在过去五年中发表),这些研究描述了旨在应对创伤对艾滋病毒相关结果影响的干预措施。特别是,本研究关注干预层面、干预措施旨在惠及的人群以及在艾滋病毒预防和治疗背景下干预措施所涉及的创伤类型。值得注意的是,在审查的艾滋病毒预防干预措施中,没有针对美国或全球男性或变性者所经历暴力的干预措施。鉴于创伤普遍存在,尤其是在艾滋病毒感染风险较高的人群中,未来的艾滋病毒预防干预措施普遍应考虑采用具有创伤意识的方法。基于性别的暴力对女性艾滋病毒结果的普遍影响已得到广泛认可,这促使人们多次呼吁采用具有创伤意识的护理(TIC)方法,以提高针对艾滋病毒感染女性的艾滋病毒服务的有效性。TIC方法可能适用于所有艾滋病毒和创伤并发流行率高的群体(例如男男性行为者、变性人群体、注射吸毒者、性工作者),无论其创伤经历类型如何,都应对这些群体进行测试。