Suppr超能文献

中世纪欧洲城市的人口与面积关系

Population-Area Relationship for Medieval European Cities.

作者信息

Cesaretti Rudolf, Lobo José, Bettencourt Luís M A, Ortman Scott G, Smith Michael E

机构信息

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85281, United States of America.

School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85281, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0162678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162678. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Medieval European urbanization presents a line of continuity between earlier cities and modern European urban systems. Yet, many of the spatial, political and economic features of medieval European cities were particular to the Middle Ages, and subsequently changed over the Early Modern Period and Industrial Revolution. There is a long tradition of demographic studies estimating the population sizes of medieval European cities, and comparative analyses of these data have shed much light on the long-term evolution of urban systems. However, the next step-to systematically relate the population size of these cities to their spatial and socioeconomic characteristics-has seldom been taken. This raises a series of interesting questions, as both modern and ancient cities have been observed to obey area-population relationships predicted by settlement scaling theory. To address these questions, we analyze a new dataset for the settled area and population of 173 European cities from the early fourteenth century to determine the relationship between population and settled area. To interpret this data, we develop two related models that lead to differing predictions regarding the quantitative form of the population-area relationship, depending on the level of social mixing present in these cities. Our empirical estimates of model parameters show a strong densification of cities with city population size, consistent with patterns in contemporary cities. Although social life in medieval Europe was orchestrated by hierarchical institutions (e.g., guilds, church, municipal organizations), our results show no statistically significant influence of these institutions on agglomeration effects. The similarities between the empirical patterns of settlement relating area to population observed here support the hypothesis that cities throughout history share common principles of organization that self-consistently relate their socioeconomic networks to structured urban spaces.

摘要

中世纪欧洲的城市化呈现出早期城市与现代欧洲城市体系之间的连续性。然而,中世纪欧洲城市的许多空间、政治和经济特征都是中世纪所特有的,随后在近代早期和工业革命期间发生了变化。人口统计学研究长期以来一直在估算中世纪欧洲城市的人口规模,对这些数据的比较分析为城市体系的长期演变提供了很多启示。然而,下一步——系统地将这些城市的人口规模与其空间和社会经济特征联系起来——却很少有人去做。这就引发了一系列有趣的问题,因为现代城市和古代城市都被观察到符合定居点规模理论所预测的面积-人口关系。为了解决这些问题,我们分析了一个新的数据集,该数据集包含173个欧洲城市从14世纪早期到现在的定居面积和人口,以确定人口与定居面积之间的关系。为了解释这些数据,我们开发了两个相关模型,这两个模型根据这些城市中社会混合的程度,对人口-面积关系的定量形式得出了不同的预测。我们对模型参数的实证估计表明,城市人口规模越大,城市密度越高,这与当代城市的模式一致。尽管中世纪欧洲的社会生活是由等级制度机构(如行会、教会、市政组织)精心安排的,但我们的结果表明,这些机构对集聚效应没有统计学上的显著影响。这里观察到的定居点面积与人口关系的实证模式之间的相似性支持了这样一种假设,即历史上的城市都有共同的组织原则,这些原则将其社会经济网络与结构化的城市空间自洽地联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfe/5051806/c6ec5564b2a2/pone.0162678.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验