• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类社会政治复杂性的扩展。

Scaling human sociopolitical complexity.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States of America.

Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0234615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234615. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234615
PMID:32614836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7332085/
Abstract

Human societies exhibit a diversity of social organizations that vary widely in size, structure, and complexity. Today, human sociopolitical complexity ranges from stateless small-scale societies of a few hundred individuals to complex states of millions, most of this diversity evolving only over the last few hundred years. Understanding how sociopolitical complexity evolved over time and space has always been a central focus of the social sciences. Yet despite this long-term interest, a quantitative understanding of how sociopolitical complexity varies across cultures is not well developed. Here we use scaling analysis to examine the statistical structure of a global sample of over a thousand human societies across multiple levels of sociopolitical complexity. First, we show that levels of sociopolitical complexity are self-similar as adjacent levels of jurisdictional hierarchy see a four-fold increase in population size, a two-fold increase in geographic range, and therefore a doubling of population density. Second, we show how this self-similarity leads to the scaling of population size and geographic range. As societies increase in complexity population density is reconfigured in space and quantified by scaling parameters. However, there is considerable overlap in population metrics across all scales suggesting that while more complex societies tend to have larger and denser populations, larger and denser populations are not necessarily more complex.

摘要

人类社会表现出多样化的社会组织形式,在规模、结构和复杂性上差异很大。如今,人类的社会政治复杂性范围从没有国家的几百人的小规模社会到拥有数百万人口的复杂国家,这种多样性的大部分都是在过去几百年中才演变而来的。了解社会政治复杂性如何随时间和空间演变一直是社会科学的核心关注点。然而,尽管人们对此长期关注,但对于文化之间社会政治复杂性的变化,还没有形成一个定量的理解。在这里,我们使用标度分析来研究跨越多个社会政治复杂性层次的全球一千多个人类社会的样本的统计结构。首先,我们表明社会政治复杂性的水平是自相似的,因为相邻的司法层级的人口规模增加了四倍,地理范围增加了两倍,因此人口密度增加了一倍。其次,我们展示了这种自相似性如何导致人口规模和地理范围的标度。随着社会复杂性的增加,人口密度在空间上重新配置,并通过标度参数进行量化。然而,在所有尺度上的人口指标都有相当大的重叠,这表明虽然更复杂的社会往往拥有更大和更密集的人口,但更大和更密集的人口并不一定更复杂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/b08f18f414f0/pone.0234615.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/65f00463aa87/pone.0234615.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/b692d90439d2/pone.0234615.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/9389abda5e2d/pone.0234615.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/f616e5c50693/pone.0234615.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/ec2b36e3da47/pone.0234615.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/553cb7eff22c/pone.0234615.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/b08f18f414f0/pone.0234615.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/65f00463aa87/pone.0234615.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/b692d90439d2/pone.0234615.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/9389abda5e2d/pone.0234615.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/f616e5c50693/pone.0234615.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/ec2b36e3da47/pone.0234615.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/553cb7eff22c/pone.0234615.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f39/7332085/b08f18f414f0/pone.0234615.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Scaling human sociopolitical complexity.人类社会政治复杂性的扩展。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0234615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234615. eCollection 2020.
2
Coevolution of landesque capital intensive agriculture and sociopolitical hierarchy.土地密集型资本型农业与社会政治等级制度的共同进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):3628-3633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714558115. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
3
Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization.定量历史分析揭示了一个单一的复杂性维度,该维度构建了人类社会组织的全球变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 9;115(2):E144-E151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708800115. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
Institutional complexity emerges from socioecological complexity in small-scale human societies.制度的复杂性源于小规模人类社会中的社会生态复杂性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 May;291(2022):20240246. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0246. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies.领导力解决小规模社会中的集体行动问题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150010. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0010.
6
Systemic Risk: The Threat to Societal Diversity and Coherence.系统性风险:对社会多样性与连贯性的威胁。
Risk Anal. 2022 Sep;42(9):1921-1934. doi: 10.1111/risa.13654. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. The case for pluralism.心理学中的社会政治多样性。多元主义的理由。
Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):205-15. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.205.
8
Measuring algorithmically infused societies.算法驱动社会的衡量。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):197-204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03666-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Sociopolitical insularity is psychology's Achilles heel.社会政治孤立是心理学的致命弱点。
Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e155. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14001393.
10
The Effects of the Mating Market, Sex, Age, and Income on Sociopolitical Orientation : Insights from Evolutionary Theory and Sexual Economics Theory.交配市场、性别、年龄和收入对社会政治取向的影响:来自进化理论和性经济学理论的见解。
Hum Nat. 2020 Mar;31(1):88-111. doi: 10.1007/s12110-019-09361-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing grand narratives of economic inequality across time.评估不同时期经济不平等的宏大叙事。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 22;122(16):e2400698121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400698121. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Why did doctrinal religions first appear in the Northern Subtropical Zone?为什么教义性宗教最初出现在北亚热带地区?
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 May 17;5:e15. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.13. eCollection 2023.
3
A quantitative analysis of intensification in the ethnographic record.量化分析民族志记录中的强化现象。

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning with remote sensing data to locate uncontacted indigenous villages in Amazonia.利用遥感数据进行机器学习以定位亚马逊地区未被接触过的原住民村庄。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2019 Jan 7;5:e170. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.170. eCollection 2019.
2
Scale and information-processing thresholds in Holocene social evolution.全新世社会进化中的规模和信息处理门槛。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 14;11(1):2394. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16035-9.
3
The two types of society: Computationally revealing recurrent social formations and their evolutionary trajectories.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1502-1509. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01120-w. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
Diversity begets diversity in mammal species and human cultures.多样性在哺乳动物物种和人类文化中产生多样性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76658-2.
两种社会类型:揭示反复出现的社会形态的计算方法及其演化轨迹。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232609. eCollection 2020.
4
The fractal structure of communities of practice: Implications for business organization.实践社区的分形结构:对商业组织的启示。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0232204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232204. eCollection 2020.
5
Hunter-gatherer multilevel sociality accelerates cumulative cultural evolution.狩猎采集者多层次的社会结构加速了累积性文化进化。
Sci Adv. 2020 Feb 28;6(9):eaax5913. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5913. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Variability in the organization and size of hunter-gatherer groups: Foragers do not live in small-scale societies.狩猎采集人群的组织和规模的多样性:觅食者并不生活在小规模社会中。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Jun;131:96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
7
Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history.在世界历史上,复杂的社会先于道德化的神出现。
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7751):226-229. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1043-4. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
Organizational complexity and demographic scale in primary states.主要国家的组织复杂性和人口规模。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 2;5(5):171137. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171137. eCollection 2018 May.
9
Optimising human community sizes.优化人类群落规模。
Evol Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;39(1):106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.11.001.
10
Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization.定量历史分析揭示了一个单一的复杂性维度,该维度构建了人类社会组织的全球变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 9;115(2):E144-E151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708800115. Epub 2017 Dec 21.