• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手指裂伤采用两次注射指神经阻滞与单次皮下掌部注射阻滞的比较。

Two injection digital block versus single subcutaneous palmar injection block for finger lacerations.

作者信息

Okur O M, Şener A, Kavakli H Ş, Çelik G K, Doğan N Ö, Içme F, Günaydin G P

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sivas State Hospital, Sivas, Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Atatürk Training And Research Hospital, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0727-9. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-016-0727-9
PMID:27709248
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare two digital nerve block techniques in patients due to traumatic digital lacerations.

METHODS

This was a randomized-controlled study designed prospectively in the emergency department of a university-based training and research hospital. Randomization was achieved by sealed envelopes. Half of the patients were randomised to traditional (two-injection) digital nerve block technique while single-injection digital nerve block technique was applied to the other half. Score of pain due to anesthetic infiltration and suturing, onset time of total anesthesia, need for an additional rescue injection were the parameters evaluated with both groups. Epinephrin added lidocaine hydrochloride preparation was used for the anesthetic application. Visual analog scale was used for the evaluation of pain scores. Outcomes were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test and Student t-test.

RESULTS

Fifty emergency department patients ≥18 years requiring digital nerve block were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the patients was 33 (min-max: 19-86) and 39 (78 %) were male. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of our main parameters; anesthesia pain score, suturing pain score, onset time of total anesthesia and rescue injection need.

CONCLUSION

Single injection volar digital nerve block technique is a suitable alternative for digital anesthesias in emergency departments.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较因手指创伤性撕裂伤而接受治疗的患者中两种数字神经阻滞技术。

方法

这是一项在一家以大学为基础的培训和研究医院急诊科进行的前瞻性随机对照研究。通过密封信封实现随机分组。一半患者被随机分配至传统(两次注射)数字神经阻滞技术组,另一半则应用单次注射数字神经阻滞技术。两组均评估麻醉浸润和缝合引起的疼痛评分、全身麻醉起效时间、是否需要额外的急救注射等参数。麻醉应用采用添加肾上腺素的盐酸利多卡因制剂。使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛评分。采用曼-惠特尼U检验和学生t检验比较结果。

结果

50名年龄≥18岁需要进行数字神经阻滞的急诊科患者纳入研究。患者的平均年龄为33岁(最小-最大:19-86岁),男性39名(78%)。两组在主要参数方面,即麻醉疼痛评分、缝合疼痛评分、全身麻醉起效时间和急救注射需求方面,未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

单次注射掌侧数字神经阻滞技术是急诊科数字麻醉的一种合适替代方法。

相似文献

1
Two injection digital block versus single subcutaneous palmar injection block for finger lacerations.手指裂伤采用两次注射指神经阻滞与单次皮下掌部注射阻滞的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0727-9. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
2
Double-dorsal versus single-volar digital subcutaneous anaesthetic injection for finger injuries in the emergency department: A randomised controlled trial.急诊科手指损伤采用双背侧与单掌侧数字皮下麻醉注射的随机对照试验
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Apr;28(2):193-8. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12559. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Evaluation of a transthecal digital nerve block in the injured pediatric patient.经鞘膜数字神经阻滞在小儿创伤患者中的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Mar;26(3):177-80. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181d1dfaf.
4
Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia and peripheral nerve block: a randomized prospective study in hand lacerations.局部浸润麻醉与周围神经阻滞的比较:手部撕裂伤的随机前瞻性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(3):694-9.
5
A comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials.传统数字阻滞与手指根部单皮下掌侧注射阻滞的比较及数字阻滞试验的荟萃分析。
J Hand Surg Br. 2006 Oct;31(5):547-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
6
Digital versus local anesthesia for finger lacerations: a randomized controlled trial.手指裂伤的数字麻醉与局部麻醉:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1046-50. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.048. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
7
The anesthetic effectiveness of lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine gel on finger lacerations.利多卡因-肾上腺素-丁卡因凝胶对手指裂伤的麻醉效果
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):812-5. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000148029.61222.9f.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of single volar subcutaneous digital block and the dorsal two injections block.掌侧单指皮下阻滞与背侧两点注射阻滞效果的比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014 Jan-Mar;26(1):88-91.
9
A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of anesthesia obtained by application of a novel topical anesthetic putty with the infiltration of lidocaine for the treatment of lacerations in the emergency department.一项比较新型局部麻醉膏敷贴和利多卡因浸润用于治疗急诊科撕裂伤的麻醉效果的非劣效性随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;63(6):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
10
Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.单注射掌侧皮下阻滞与双注射背侧阻滞用于手指麻醉的随机对照比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct;118(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237016.00941.96.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of pain and extent of anesthesia in digital blocks for isolated finger lacerations: A randomized controlled trial.孤立性手指裂伤指神经阻滞的疼痛与麻醉范围比较:一项随机对照试验。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 1;22(3):125-130. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_344_21. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
2
Digital nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.指神经阻滞:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 1;3(4):e12753. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12753. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
[Oberst's block anesthesia].

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia and peripheral nerve block: a randomized prospective study in hand lacerations.局部浸润麻醉与周围神经阻滞的比较:手部撕裂伤的随机前瞻性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(3):694-9.
2
Update/Review: changing of use of local anesthesia in the hand.更新/综述:手部局部麻醉使用的变化
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Jun 6;2(5):e150. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000095. eCollection 2014 May.
3
Local Anesthetics: What's New in Minimal Pain Injection and Best Evidence in Pain Control.局部麻醉剂:微创注射的新进展与疼痛控制的最佳证据
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Feb;32(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s00064-019-00633-y. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Updates in emergency department laceration management.急诊科伤口处理的最新进展。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;6(2):97-105. doi: 10.15441/ceem.18.018. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4 Suppl 2):40S-49S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000679.
4
Dosage of local anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery.清醒手部手术中局部麻醉的剂量
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Oct;38(10):2025-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
5
Epinephrine and hand surgery.肾上腺素与手部手术
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jun;37(6):1254-6; quiz 1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.022. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
6
Tumescent technique in digits: a subcutaneous single-injection digital block.肿胀技术在手指:一种皮下单次注射手指阻滞。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 May;30(4):592-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
7
Digital anaesthesia: one injection or two?数字麻醉:一针还是两针?
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jul;27(7):533-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.072850. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
8
Comparison of traditional two injections dorsal digital block with volar block.传统两针指背阻滞与掌侧阻滞的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Dec;18(12):768-70.
9
Finger injection with high-dose (1:1,000) epinephrine: Does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated?手指注射高剂量(1:1000)肾上腺素:会导致手指坏死吗?是否需要治疗?
Hand (N Y). 2007 Mar;2(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/s11552-006-9012-4.
10
Painless method of digital block.数字阻滞的无痛方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):444-445. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000233621.40366.a4.