• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力与表现

Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.

作者信息

Kirby R Lee, Worobey Lynn A, Cowan Rachel, Pedersen Jessica Presperin, Heinemann Allen W, Dyson-Hudson Trevor A, Shea Mary, Smith Cher, Rushton Paula W, Boninger Michael L

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015
PMID:27317867
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the wheelchair skills capacity and performance of experienced manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive study involving within-subject comparisons.

SETTING

Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Manual wheelchair users with SCI (N=117).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

WST and WST-Q version 4.2 as well as measures for Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, Ability to Participate, Satisfaction, and Pain Interference.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) values for WST capacity, WST-Q capacity, and WST-Q performance were 81.0% (69.0%-90.0%), 88.0% (77.0%-97.0%), and 76.0% (66.3%-84.0%). The total WST capacity scores correlated significantly with the total WST-Q capacity scores (r=.76; P<.01) and WST-Q performance scores (r=.55; P<.01). The total WST-Q capacity and WST-Q performance scores were correlated significantly (r=.63; P<.001). Success rates were <75% for 10 of the 32 (31%) individual skills on the WST and 6 of the 32 (19%) individual skills on the WST-Q. Regression models for the total WST and WST-Q measures identified statistically significant predictors including age, sex, body mass index, and/or level of injury. The WST and WST-Q measures correlated significantly with the Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, or Pain Interference measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Many people with SCI are unable to or do not perform some of the wheelchair skills that would allow them to participate more fully. More wheelchair skills training may enhance participation and quality of life of adults with SCI. The WST and WST-Q exhibit good content, construct, and concurrent validity.

摘要

目的

描述脊髓损伤(SCI)后有经验的手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力和表现,并评估轮椅技能测试(WST)和轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)的测量属性。

设计

涉及受试者内比较的横断面描述性研究。

地点

四个脊髓损伤模型系统中心。

参与者

脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者(N = 117)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

WST和WST-Q第4.2版以及信心、基本移动性、独立性、参与能力、满意度和疼痛干扰的测量指标。

结果

WST能力、WST-Q能力和WST-Q表现的中位数(四分位间距)值分别为81.0%(69.0%-90.0%)、88.0%(77.0%-97.0%)和76.0%(66.3%-84.0%)。WST总能力得分与WST-Q总能力得分(r = 0.76;P < 0.01)和WST-Q表现得分(r = 0.55;P < 0.01)显著相关。WST-Q总能力得分与WST-Q表现得分显著相关(r = 0.63;P < 0.001)。WST上32项(31%)个体技能中有10项的成功率<75%,WST-Q上32项(19%)个体技能中有6项的成功率<75%。WST和WST-Q总测量指标的回归模型确定了包括年龄、性别、体重指数和/或损伤水平在内的具有统计学意义的预测因素。WST和WST-Q测量指标与信心、基本移动性、独立性或疼痛干扰测量指标显著相关。

结论

许多脊髓损伤患者无法或未进行某些能使他们更充分参与的轮椅技能。更多的轮椅技能训练可能会提高脊髓损伤成年人的参与度和生活质量。WST和WST-Q具有良好的内容效度、结构效度和同时效度。

相似文献

1
Wheelchair Skills Capacity and Performance of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力与表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Skills Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.脊髓损伤患者群体轮椅技能训练的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1777-1784.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤手动轮椅使用者的西班牙语版轮椅技能测试4.2的可靠性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Nov;14(8):788-791. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1463404. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Manual wheelchair skills capacity predicts quality of life and community integration in persons with spinal cord injury.手动轮椅技能能力可预测脊髓损伤患者的生活质量和社区融入度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Manual wheelchair skills capacity versus performance.手动轮椅技能能力与表现。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.027. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
6
Manual wheelchair skills: objective testing versus subjective questionnaire.手动轮椅技能:客观测试与主观问卷。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version.轮椅技能测试,第2.4版:基于算法的问卷版本的有效性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Mar;85(3):416-23. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00427-1.
8
Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users.电动轮椅使用者轮椅技能测试问卷的测量属性
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400-6. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.984778. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Relationship between wheelchair skills scores and peak aerobic exercise capacity of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.脊髓损伤患者轮椅技能评分与峰值有氧运动能力的关系:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jan;42(1):114-121. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1493545. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.新使用机动轮椅者自我报告的轮椅技能测试问卷评分的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):483-490. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1874065. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of wheelchair skills training during peer-led Active Rehabilitation Camps for people with spinal cord injury in Poland: a cohort study.波兰脊髓损伤人群在同伴主导的积极康复营中进行轮椅技能训练的效果:一项队列研究。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Nov;62(11):651-657. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01034-0. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
A semi-structured interview to capture manual wheelchair use for mobility activities among individuals with spinal cord injury in real-life situations: development and content validity of the Wheelchair Mobility Activity Log (WC-MAL).一种半结构化访谈,用于在现实生活情况下捕获脊髓损伤个体使用手动轮椅进行活动的情况:轮椅活动日志(WC-MAL)的开发和内容有效性。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Aug;62(8):468-478. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01011-7. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges.手动轮椅使用者的社区移动性与参与度评估:当前技术与挑战综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 5;17:1331395. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1331395. eCollection 2023.
4
Steering-by-leaning facilitates intuitive movement control and improved efficiency in manual wheelchairs.倾斜转向有助于直观的运动控制,并提高手动轮椅的效率。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Oct 27;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01265-x.
5
Efficacy of Wheelchair Skills Training Program in Enhancing Sitting Balance and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Tetraplegic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.轮椅技能训练计划对改善慢性四肢瘫痪患者坐位平衡和肺功能的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 6;59(9):1610. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091610.
6
Ergonomic guidelines for the design interfaces of additive modules for manual wheelchairs: sagittal plane.手动轮椅附加模块设计界面的人体工程学指南:矢状面。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):11993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39085-7.
7
Predictors of participation enfranchisement of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury in the United States.美国脊髓损伤轮椅使用者参与赋权的预测因素。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2023 Sep;46(5):789-797. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2087336. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
The associations of functional independence and quality of life with sitting balance and wheelchair skills among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤轮椅使用者的功能独立性和生活质量与坐位平衡及轮椅技能之间的关联。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 May;47(3):361-368. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2057721. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Turning in Circles: Understanding Manual Wheelchair Use Towards Developing User-Friendly Steering Systems.原地打转:理解手动轮椅的使用以开发用户友好型转向系统。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 17;10:831528. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.831528. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploratory investigation of the outcomes of wheelchair provision through two service models in Indonesia.印度尼西亚两种服务模式下提供轮椅服务结果的探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0228428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228428. eCollection 2021.