Kirby R Lee, Worobey Lynn A, Cowan Rachel, Pedersen Jessica Presperin, Heinemann Allen W, Dyson-Hudson Trevor A, Shea Mary, Smith Cher, Rushton Paula W, Boninger Michael L
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
To describe the wheelchair skills capacity and performance of experienced manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q).
Cross-sectional descriptive study involving within-subject comparisons.
Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems centers.
Manual wheelchair users with SCI (N=117).
Not applicable.
WST and WST-Q version 4.2 as well as measures for Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, Ability to Participate, Satisfaction, and Pain Interference.
The median (interquartile range) values for WST capacity, WST-Q capacity, and WST-Q performance were 81.0% (69.0%-90.0%), 88.0% (77.0%-97.0%), and 76.0% (66.3%-84.0%). The total WST capacity scores correlated significantly with the total WST-Q capacity scores (r=.76; P<.01) and WST-Q performance scores (r=.55; P<.01). The total WST-Q capacity and WST-Q performance scores were correlated significantly (r=.63; P<.001). Success rates were <75% for 10 of the 32 (31%) individual skills on the WST and 6 of the 32 (19%) individual skills on the WST-Q. Regression models for the total WST and WST-Q measures identified statistically significant predictors including age, sex, body mass index, and/or level of injury. The WST and WST-Q measures correlated significantly with the Confidence, Basic Mobility, Independence, or Pain Interference measures.
Many people with SCI are unable to or do not perform some of the wheelchair skills that would allow them to participate more fully. More wheelchair skills training may enhance participation and quality of life of adults with SCI. The WST and WST-Q exhibit good content, construct, and concurrent validity.
描述脊髓损伤(SCI)后有经验的手动轮椅使用者的轮椅技能能力和表现,并评估轮椅技能测试(WST)和轮椅技能测试问卷(WST-Q)的测量属性。
涉及受试者内比较的横断面描述性研究。
四个脊髓损伤模型系统中心。
脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者(N = 117)。
不适用。
WST和WST-Q第4.2版以及信心、基本移动性、独立性、参与能力、满意度和疼痛干扰的测量指标。
WST能力、WST-Q能力和WST-Q表现的中位数(四分位间距)值分别为81.0%(69.0%-90.0%)、88.0%(77.0%-97.0%)和76.0%(66.3%-84.0%)。WST总能力得分与WST-Q总能力得分(r = 0.76;P < 0.01)和WST-Q表现得分(r = 0.55;P < 0.01)显著相关。WST-Q总能力得分与WST-Q表现得分显著相关(r = 0.63;P < 0.001)。WST上32项(31%)个体技能中有10项的成功率<75%,WST-Q上32项(19%)个体技能中有6项的成功率<75%。WST和WST-Q总测量指标的回归模型确定了包括年龄、性别、体重指数和/或损伤水平在内的具有统计学意义的预测因素。WST和WST-Q测量指标与信心、基本移动性、独立性或疼痛干扰测量指标显著相关。
许多脊髓损伤患者无法或未进行某些能使他们更充分参与的轮椅技能。更多的轮椅技能训练可能会提高脊髓损伤成年人的参与度和生活质量。WST和WST-Q具有良好的内容效度、结构效度和同时效度。