• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在左乙拉西坦背景治疗基础上,拉科酰胺与钠通道阻滞型抗癫痫药物的交叉滴定。

Lacosamide and sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drug cross-titration against levetiracetam background therapy.

作者信息

Baulac M, Byrnes W, Williams P, Borghs S, Webster E, De Backer M, Dedeken P

机构信息

Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, IHU-ICM, Paris, France.

UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Apr;135(4):434-441. doi: 10.1111/ane.12691. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/ane.12691
PMID:27714769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5347878/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess prospectively the effectiveness of lacosamide (LCM) added to levetiracetam (LEV) after down-titration of a concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB) among patients with focal epilepsy not adequately controlled on LEV and SCB.

METHODS

In this open-label trial, LCM was initiated at 100 mg/day and up-titrated to 200-600 mg/day over 9 weeks; SCB down-titration started when LCM dose reached 200 mg/day. Patients remained on stable LCM/LEV doses for 12 weeks' maintenance (21-week treatment period). The primary outcome was retention rate on LCM.

RESULTS

Due to recruitment challenges, fewer than the planned 300 patients participated in the trial, resulting in the trial being underpowered. Overall, 120 patients (mean age 39.7 years) started and 93 completed the trial. The most frequently used SCBs were lamotrigine (39.2%), carbamazepine (30.8%) and oxcarbazepine (27.5%). Eighty-four patients adhered to protocol and discontinued their SCB after cross-titration, but there was insufficient evidence for 36 patients. Retention rate was 73.3% (88/120) for all patients and 83.3% (70/84) for those with evidence of SCB discontinuation. Seizure freedom for patients completing maintenance was 14.0% (13/93). Discontinuation due to adverse events (6.7%) and lack of efficacy (3.3%) occurred primarily during cross-titration. Most frequently reported adverse events during treatment were dizziness (23.3%), headache (15.0%) and fatigue (8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with uncontrolled seizures on LEV/SCB, the LCM/LEV combination appeared to be effective and well tolerated. A cross-titration schedule-flexible LCM up-titration, concomitant SCB down-titration and stable background LEV-could present a feasible and practical approach to initiating LCM while minimizing pharmacodynamic interactions with a SCB.

摘要

目的

前瞻性评估在左乙拉西坦(LEV)和钠通道阻滞剂(SCB)联合治疗效果不佳的局灶性癫痫患者中,在逐渐减少SCB剂量的同时添加拉科酰胺(LCM)至LEV治疗方案中的有效性。

方法

在这项开放标签试验中,LCM起始剂量为100mg/天,并在9周内逐渐增加至200 - 600mg/天;当LCM剂量达到200mg/天时开始逐渐减少SCB剂量。患者维持稳定的LCM/LEV剂量12周(治疗期共21周)。主要结局指标为LCM的留存率。

结果

由于招募困难,参与试验的患者少于计划的300例,导致试验效能不足。总体而言,120例患者(平均年龄39.7岁)开始试验,93例完成试验。最常用的SCB为拉莫三嗪(39.2%)、卡马西平(30.8%)和奥卡西平(27.5%)。84例患者遵循方案并在交叉滴定后停用SCB,但36例患者缺乏充分证据。所有患者的留存率为73.3%(88/120),有证据表明停用SCB的患者留存率为83.3%(70/84)。完成维持治疗的患者无癫痫发作率为14.0%(13/93)。因不良事件停药(6.7%)和因缺乏疗效停药(3.3%)主要发生在交叉滴定期间。治疗期间最常报告的不良事件为头晕(23.3%)、头痛(15.0%)和疲劳(8.3%)。

结论

在LEV/SCB治疗下癫痫发作未得到控制的患者中,LCM/LEV联合治疗似乎有效且耐受性良好。一种交叉滴定方案——灵活增加LCM剂量、同时逐渐减少SCB剂量以及维持稳定的背景LEV治疗——可能是启动LCM治疗的一种可行且实用的方法,同时可最大程度减少与SCB的药效学相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/b7c23348d821/ANE-135-434-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/cf897ac4cefb/ANE-135-434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/420398a7f05d/ANE-135-434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/56fe17a0feb9/ANE-135-434-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/b7c23348d821/ANE-135-434-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/cf897ac4cefb/ANE-135-434-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/420398a7f05d/ANE-135-434-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/56fe17a0feb9/ANE-135-434-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f87/5347878/b7c23348d821/ANE-135-434-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Lacosamide and sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drug cross-titration against levetiracetam background therapy.在左乙拉西坦背景治疗基础上,拉科酰胺与钠通道阻滞型抗癫痫药物的交叉滴定。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Apr;135(4):434-441. doi: 10.1111/ane.12691. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
2
Quality of life, mood and seizure control in patients with brain tumor related epilepsy treated with lacosamide as add-on therapy: A prospective explorative study with a historical control group.作为附加疗法使用拉科酰胺治疗脑肿瘤相关性癫痫患者的生活质量、情绪及癫痫控制情况:一项设有历史对照组的前瞻性探索性研究
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Aug;73:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
3
Lacosamide use in children with epilepsy: Retention rate and effect of concomitant sodium channel blockers in a large cohort.拉科酰胺在癫痫儿童中的应用:大型队列研究中保留率及联合使用钠通道阻滞剂的效果
Epilepsia. 2016 Sep;57(9):1416-25. doi: 10.1111/epi.13466. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
A pooled analysis of lacosamide clinical trial data grouped by mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.拉科酰胺临床试验数据的汇总分析按伴随抗癫痫药物作用机制分组。
CNS Drugs. 2010 Dec;24(12):1055-68. doi: 10.2165/11587550-000000000-00000.
5
An open-label study of levetiracetam at individualised doses between 1000 and 3000 mg day(-1) in adult patients with refractory epilepsy.一项关于左乙拉西坦个体化剂量为每日1000至3000毫克用于难治性癫痫成年患者的开放标签研究。
Seizure. 2003 Apr;12(3):141-9. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(02)00292-3.
6
Lacosamide in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: A long-term study of 136 patients.拉科酰胺治疗癫痫和智力障碍患者:136例患者的长期研究
Epilepsia. 2017 Oct;58(10):1749-1754. doi: 10.1111/epi.13869. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
7
Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial.左乙拉西坦治疗儿童部分性癫痫发作的疗效与安全性:一项开放性试验。
Epilepsia. 2002 May;43(5):518-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.13101.x.
8
Long-term efficacy and safety of lacosamide and levetiracetam monotherapy in elderly patients with focal epilepsy: A retrospective study.拉科酰胺和左乙拉西坦单药治疗老年局灶性癫痫患者的长期疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 May;94:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
9
Lacosamide tolerability in adult patients with partial-onset seizures: Impact of planned reduction and mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.拉科酰胺在成人部分性发作患者中的耐受性:计划减量的影响及联合抗癫痫药物的作用机制
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Apr;57(Pt A):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
10
Safety and tolerability of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for adults with partial-onset seizures: Analysis of data pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.拉科酰胺作为成人部分性发作辅助治疗的安全性和耐受性:来自三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的汇总数据分析
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov;52(Pt A):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The therapeutic effects of lacosamide on epilepsy-associated comorbidities.拉科酰胺对癫痫相关合并症的治疗作用。
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 16;14:1063703. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1063703. eCollection 2023.
2
Inherited and Acquired Rhythm Disturbances in Sick Sinus Syndrome, Brugada Syndrome, and Atrial Fibrillation: Lessons from Preclinical Modeling.遗传性和获得性窦房结综合征、Brugada 综合征和心房颤动中的节律紊乱:临床前模型研究的启示。
Cells. 2021 Nov 15;10(11):3175. doi: 10.3390/cells10113175.
3
Lacosamide monotherapy in clinical practice: A retrospective chart review.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized double-blind comparison of cognitive and EEG effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine.拉科酰胺与卡马西平对认知及脑电图影响的随机双盲比较
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Sep;62:267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
2
Long-term adjunctive lacosamide treatment in patients with partial-onset seizures.拉科酰胺对部分性发作患者的长期辅助治疗
Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Feb;133(2):136-144. doi: 10.1111/ane.12451. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Cognitive effects of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy.拉考酰胺作为难治性癫痫辅助治疗的认知效应。
拉考沙胺单药治疗的临床实践:一项回顾性图表研究。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Sep;138(3):186-194. doi: 10.1111/ane.12920. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015 Jun;131(6):347-54. doi: 10.1111/ane.12372. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Current understanding of the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide.抗癫痫药物拉科酰胺作用机制的当前认识。
Epilepsy Res. 2015 Feb;110:189-205. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Safety and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide among patients with partial-onset seizures in a long-term open-label extension trial of up to 8 years.在一项长达8年的长期开放标签扩展试验中,拉科酰胺辅助治疗部分性发作患者的安全性和有效性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Dec;41:164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.074. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
6
Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: results from a Phase III open-label extension trial.拉科酰胺辅助治疗未控制部分发作性癫痫患者的长期安全性和疗效:III 期开放标签扩展试验结果。
Epilepsia. 2012 Mar;53(3):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x.
7
Minimizing pharmacodynamic interactions of high doses of lacosamide.尽量减少高剂量拉考沙胺的药效学相互作用。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2012 Apr;125(4):228-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01619.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
Antiepileptic drug therapy: does mechanism of action matter?抗癫痫药物治疗:作用机制重要吗?
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Aug;21(4):331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.05.025. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
9
The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults.成人癫痫的药物治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 May;10(5):446-56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70047-3.
10
A pooled analysis of lacosamide clinical trial data grouped by mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.拉科酰胺临床试验数据的汇总分析按伴随抗癫痫药物作用机制分组。
CNS Drugs. 2010 Dec;24(12):1055-68. doi: 10.2165/11587550-000000000-00000.