Thompson P, Travis D
Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, UK.
Perception. 1989;18(2):231-5. doi: 10.1068/p180231.
Mayhew and Frisby (1978) demonstrated that patterns which differ markedly in their spatial-frequency content may be very hard to discriminate. This they took as evidence against any model which proposes that the processes underlying texture discrimination have direct access to some local piecewise Fourier analysis of the patterns performed by spatial-frequency channels. It is shown that Mayhew and Frisby's patterns can be discriminated easily if their components have been incorporated into a pattern-contingent colour aftereffect. This demonstration suggests that the location in the visual pathway for contingent aftereffect adaptation must lie before the construction of the raw primal sketch, to which, according to Marr, we have conscious access. This location must also allow the orientation specificity seen in the aftereffect. This points to a locus in the striate cortex.
梅休和弗里斯比(1978年)证明,空间频率内容显著不同的图案可能很难区分。他们以此作为证据,反对任何提出纹理辨别背后的过程可以直接进行由空间频率通道对图案进行的某种局部逐段傅里叶分析的模型。结果表明,如果将梅休和弗里斯比的图案的组成部分纳入图案相关颜色后效中,就可以很容易地对其进行区分。这一证明表明,对于相关后效适应而言,视觉通路中的位置必定位于原始草图构建之前,根据马尔的观点,我们能够有意识地接触到原始草图。这个位置还必须允许后效中出现的方向特异性。这指向了纹状皮层中的一个位点。