Clavert P, Koch G, Neyton L, Metais P, Barth J, Walch G, Lafosse L
Institut d'anatomie normale, FMTS, faculté de médecine, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France; Service de chirurgie du membre supérieur, CCOM, avenue Baumann, 67400 Illkirch, France.
Institut d'anatomie normale, FMTS, faculté de médecine, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8S):S281-S285. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
Standard radiography with an antero-posterior view and Bernageau's glenoid profile view is the method most widely reported in the literature to assess coracoid bone block position and fusion.
The aim of this cadaver study was to determine whether the antero-posterior and Bernageau's radiographs provide a reliable and reproducible evaluation of the position of a coracoid bone block and its fixation screws.
An isolated scapula showing no evidence of osteoarthritis or other abnormalities was used. The coracoid process was transferred to the anterior glenoid rim. Fixation was with two slightly diverging malleolar screws, chosen of different sizes for ease of identification. Computed tomography (CT) was performed as the reference imaging technique. The standard radiographs were then obtained, using fluoroscopy to accurately position the scapula for the antero-posterior and Bernageau's views. This position was defined as 0°, and radiographs were taken at angles of 5°, 10°, and 15° in all three planes. All radiographs were taken during a single session to ensure that the distance separating the tube from the scapula remained unchanged. The images were exported to OsiriX for analysis. We measured the angles formed by the screws and the glenoid surface, as well as bone block position and overhang. Finally, we used 1-mm thick disks to evaluate bone-to-bone contact.
No correlations were found between values by CT and by standard radiography (both views) for the screw angles or overhang. A space≤1mm between the neck of the scapula and the bone block was not visible on the standard radiographs in any of the positions.
Standard radiography does not provide an accurate analysis of bone block position or bone-to-bone contact. CT is needed to assess bone block and screw position and bone-to-bone contact.
Level III.
前后位X线片和贝纳热(Bernageau)肩胛盂轮廓位X线片是文献中报道最多的用于评估喙突骨块位置和融合情况的方法。
本尸体研究旨在确定前后位和贝纳热位X线片能否对喙突骨块及其固定螺钉的位置进行可靠且可重复的评估。
使用一块未显示骨关节炎或其他异常迹象的孤立肩胛骨。将喙突转移至肩胛盂前缘。用两枚略有发散的踝关节螺钉进行固定,选择不同尺寸以便于识别。以计算机断层扫描(CT)作为参考成像技术。然后获取标准X线片,利用荧光透视精确将肩胛骨定位以获得前后位和贝纳热位影像。此位置定义为0°,并在所有三个平面以5°、10°和15°的角度拍摄X线片。所有X线片均在同一次检查中拍摄,以确保球管与肩胛骨之间的距离保持不变。将图像导出至OsiriX软件进行分析。我们测量了螺钉与肩胛盂表面形成的角度、骨块位置和骨块悬垂。最后,我们用1毫米厚的圆盘评估骨与骨之间的接触情况。
CT测量值与标准X线片(两种视图)测量的螺钉角度或骨块悬垂值之间均未发现相关性。在任何位置的标准X线片上均未见到肩胛骨颈部与骨块之间≤1毫米的间隙。
标准X线片无法准确分析骨块位置或骨与骨之间的接触情况。评估骨块和螺钉位置以及骨与骨之间的接触情况需要CT检查。
三级。