Hayes K W, Sullivan J E
Programs in Physical Therapy, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611.
Phys Ther. 1989 Sep;69(9):762-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/69.9.762.
The purposes of the study were to determine the reliability of a new device used to quantify shoulder subluxation and to estimate its standard error of measurement. The device is an L-shaped thermoplastic jig with a metric tape measure embedded in it. A sliding beak-like marker, which can be anchored with a thumbscrew, is used to identify landmarks and to measure the amount of subluxation. Eight male and two female hemiplegic subjects, 40 to 80 years old, consented to be measured for subluxation. Three standardized subluxation measurements were taken by one investigator to determine the reliability with a single rater. One measurement was taken by a second investigator and compared with the first measurement obtained by the first investigator to determine the reliability using more than one rater. Both investigators were experienced physical therapists. Each measurement was read by the other investigator, who disassembled the jig and cleaned the marks from the patient between measurements. For both analyses, an analysis of variance for repeated measurements reflected no differences between measurements attributable to raters. The unbiased intraclass correlation coefficient for a single measurement by a single rater was .89 (p less than .01) and for more than one rater was .74 (p less than .01). The standard error of measurement was +/- 0.77 mm for a single rater and +/- 1.20 mm for more than one rater. We recommend the jig as a tool to measure shoulder subluxation in patients.
本研究的目的是确定一种用于量化肩关节半脱位的新装置的可靠性,并估计其测量标准误差。该装置是一个嵌入了公制卷尺的L形热塑性夹具。一个可通过翼形螺钉固定的滑动喙状标记器用于识别标志点并测量半脱位的程度。八名男性和两名女性偏瘫患者,年龄在40至80岁之间,同意接受半脱位测量。一名研究人员进行了三次标准化的半脱位测量,以确定单一评分者的可靠性。第二名研究人员进行了一次测量,并与第一名研究人员获得的第一次测量结果进行比较,以确定使用多名评分者时的可靠性。两名研究人员均为经验丰富的物理治疗师。每次测量后,另一名研究人员会读取测量结果,该研究人员会拆解夹具并在测量之间清除患者身上的标记。对于这两种分析,重复测量的方差分析表明,测量结果之间不存在因评分者导致的差异。单一评分者单次测量的无偏组内相关系数为0.89(p小于0.01),多名评分者的无偏组内相关系数为0.74(p小于0.01)。单一评分者的测量标准误差为±0.77毫米,多名评分者的测量标准误差为±1.20毫米。我们推荐该夹具作为测量患者肩关节半脱位的工具。