Kahook Malik Y, Cionni Robert J, Taravella Michael J, Ang Robert E, Waite Aaron N, Solomon Jonathan D, Uy Harvey S
J Refract Surg. 2016 Oct 1;32(10):654-658. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160609-02.
To compare size, circularity, and centration outcomes of continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) performed with or without assistance from the VERUS ophthalmic caliper (Mile High Ophthalmics, Denver, CO).
This was a multicenter retrospective consecutive case controlled series review.
Data from 40 consecutive cases using the VERUS device for CCC were compared to 40 consecutive cases with standard manual CCC. VERUS-assisted CCC size, circularity, and centration were closer to target compared to that of manual only procedures (P < .05). The average time from initiation to completion of the capsulotomy was shorter with manual (40 ± 11 seconds) compared to VERUS-assisted (71 ± 13 seconds) cases (P < .0001).
The VERUS ophthalmic caliper is effective at improving size, circularity, and centration of the CCC in a time-efficient manner when compared to manual procedures performed without VERUS guidance. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):654-658.].
比较在有或没有VERUS眼科卡尺（科罗拉多州丹佛市迈尔高地眼科公司）辅助的情况下进行连续环形撕囊（CCC）的大小、圆形度和中心定位结果。
这是一项多中心回顾性连续病例对照系列研究。
将连续40例使用VERUS设备进行CCC的病例数据与连续40例采用标准手动CCC的病例进行比较。与仅采用手动操作的手术相比，VERUS辅助的CCC在大小、圆形度和中心定位方面更接近目标值（P < 0.05）。与VERUS辅助的病例（71 ± 13秒）相比，手动操作（40 ± 11秒）从开始到完成撕囊的平均时间更短（P < 0.0001）。
与在没有VERUS引导的情况下进行的手动操作相比，VERUS眼科卡尺能够有效地提高CCC的大小、圆形度和中心定位，且具有时间效率。[《屈光手术杂志》。2016年；32(10):654 - 658。]
