Käppler Andrea, Fischer Dieter, Oberbeckmann Sonja, Schernewski Gerald, Labrenz Matthias, Eichhorn Klaus-Jochen, Voit Brigitte
Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Str. 6, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Organische Chemie der Polymere, Technische Universität Dresden, Hohe Str. 6, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Nov;408(29):8377-8391. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9956-3. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
The contamination of aquatic ecosystems with microplastics has recently been reported through many studies, and negative impacts on the aquatic biota have been described. For the chemical identification of microplastics, mainly Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy are used. But up to now, a critical comparison and validation of both spectroscopic methods with respect to microplastics analysis is missing. To close this knowledge gap, we investigated environmental samples by both Raman and FTIR spectroscopy. Firstly, particles and fibres >500 μm extracted from beach sediment samples were analysed by Raman and FTIR microspectroscopic single measurements. Our results illustrate that both methods are in principle suitable to identify microplastics from the environment. However, in some cases, especially for coloured particles, a combination of both spectroscopic methods is necessary for a complete and reliable characterisation of the chemical composition. Secondly, a marine sample containing particles <400 μm was investigated by Raman imaging and FTIR transmission imaging. The results were compared regarding number, size and type of detectable microplastics as well as spectra quality, measurement time and handling. We show that FTIR imaging leads to significant underestimation (about 35 %) of microplastics compared to Raman imaging, especially in the size range <20 μm. However, the measurement time of Raman imaging is considerably higher compared to FTIR imaging. In summary, we propose a further size division within the smaller microplastics fraction into 500-50 μm (rapid and reliable analysis by FTIR imaging) and into 50-1 μm (detailed and more time-consuming analysis by Raman imaging). Graphical Abstract Marine microplastic sample (fraction <400 μm) on a silicon filter (middle) with the corresponding Raman and IR images.
近期诸多研究报道了微塑料对水生生态系统的污染,并描述了其对水生生物群的负面影响。对于微塑料的化学鉴定,主要使用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和拉曼光谱。但截至目前,针对微塑料分析的这两种光谱方法缺乏关键的比较和验证。为填补这一知识空白,我们同时采用拉曼光谱和FTIR光谱对环境样本进行了研究。首先,对从海滩沉积物样本中提取的粒径大于500μm的颗粒和纤维进行了拉曼光谱和FTIR显微光谱单测量分析。我们的结果表明,这两种方法原则上都适用于识别环境中的微塑料。然而,在某些情况下,特别是对于有色颗粒,需要结合使用这两种光谱方法才能对化学成分进行完整可靠的表征。其次,通过拉曼成像和FTIR透射成像对一个含有粒径小于400μm颗粒的海洋样本进行了研究。比较了两种方法在可检测微塑料的数量、尺寸和类型以及光谱质量、测量时间和操作方面的结果。我们发现,与拉曼成像相比,FTIR成像导致微塑料的显著低估(约35%),尤其是在粒径小于20μm的范围内。然而,拉曼成像的测量时间相比FTIR成像要长得多。总之,我们建议将较小微塑料部分进一步细分为500 - 50μm(通过FTIR成像进行快速可靠分析)和50 - 1μm(通过拉曼成像进行详细且耗时更长的分析)。图形摘要 硅滤膜上的海洋微塑料样本(粒径小于400μm部分)(中间)以及相应的拉曼图像和红外图像