Diakonis Vasilios F, Likht Nikita Y, Yesilirmak Nilufer, Delgado Desiree, Karatapanis Andreas E, Yesilirmak Yener, Fraker Christopher, Yoo Sonia H, Ziebarth Noël M
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL, USA.
Florida Lions Eye Bank, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, FL, USA.
Exp Eye Res. 2016 Dec;153:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
The purpose of this study was to assess anterior and mid corneal stromal elasticity after high intensity (HI) corneal cross linking (CXL), with and without oxygen (O) enrichment, and compare these results to conventional CXL. Experiments were performed on 25 pairs of human cadaver eyes, divided into four different groups. Group 1 included corneas that did not receive treatment and served as controls; Group 2 included corneas that received conventional CXL treatment (Dresden Protocol: corneal epithelial debridement, 30 min of riboflavin pretreatment followed by 30 min of exposure to 3 mW/cm of ultraviolet light); Group 3 included corneas that received HI CXL treatment (corneal epithelial debridement, 30 min of riboflavin pretreatment followed by 3 min of exposure to 30mW/cm of ultraviolet light); and Group 4 included corneas that received the same treatment as Group 3, except that they were enriched with oxygen (4 L per minute pure O gas stream) during ultraviolet irradiation. In each group, corneas were subdivided to assess anterior stromal elasticity and mid stromal elasticity. Corneal stromal elasticity was quantified using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) through micro-indentation. Young's modulus for the anterior corneal stroma was 14.5 ± 6.0 kPa, 80.7 ± 44.6 kPa, 36.6 ± 10.5 kPa, and 30.6 ± 9.2 kPa, for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Young's modulus for the mid corneal stroma was 5.8 ± 2.0 kPa, 20.7 ± 4.3 kPa, 12.1 ± 4.9 kPa, and 11.7 ± 3.7 kPa, for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. In the anterior stromal region, conventional CXL demonstrated a significantly different result from the control, whereas the two HI CXL protocols were not significantly different from the control. There were no statistical differences between the two HI CXL protocols, although only the HI CXL protocol with O enrichment was significantly different from the conventional CXL group. In the mid stromal region, once again only conventional CXL demonstrated a significantly different result from the control. There were no statistical differences between the two HI CXL protocols, and both HI CXL protocols were significantly different from the conventional CXL group. Oxygen enriched HI CXL seems to offer similar changes in corneal elasticity when compared to HI CXL without the presence O. Conventional CXL increases corneal stiffness more than HI CXL both with and without O enrichment.
本研究的目的是评估高强度(HI)角膜交联(CXL)在有氧(O)富集和无氧情况下角膜前基质和中基质的弹性,并将这些结果与传统CXL进行比较。对25对人尸体眼睛进行了实验,分为四个不同的组。第1组包括未接受治疗的角膜作为对照;第2组包括接受传统CXL治疗的角膜(德累斯顿方案:角膜上皮清创,30分钟核黄素预处理,然后暴露于3 mW/cm的紫外线下30分钟);第3组包括接受HI CXL治疗的角膜(角膜上皮清创,30分钟核黄素预处理,然后暴露于30 mW/cm的紫外线下3分钟);第4组包括接受与第3组相同治疗的角膜,只是在紫外线照射期间用氧气(每分钟4 L纯氧气流)富集。在每组中,将角膜再细分以评估前基质弹性和中基质弹性。使用原子力显微镜(AFM)通过微压痕对角膜基质弹性进行量化。第1、2、3和4组前角膜基质的杨氏模量分别为14.5±6.0 kPa、80.7±44.6 kPa、36.6±10.5 kPa和30.6±9.2 kPa。第1、2、3和4组中角膜基质的杨氏模量分别为5.8±2.0 kPa、20.7±4.3 kPa、12.1±4.9 kPa和11.7±3.7 kPa。在前基质区域,传统CXL的结果与对照组有显著差异,而两种HI CXL方案与对照组无显著差异。两种HI CXL方案之间无统计学差异,尽管只有富氧的HI CXL方案与传统CXL组有显著差异。在中基质区域,同样只有传统CXL的结果与对照组有显著差异。两种HI CXL方案之间无统计学差异,且两种HI CXL方案均与传统CXL组有显著差异。与无氧的HI CXL相比,富氧的HI CXL似乎能使角膜弹性产生类似的变化。无论有无氧气富集,传统CXL都比HI CXL更能增加角膜硬度。