• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,对肩袖生活质量指数(RC-QOL)进行进一步验证和可靠性测试。

Further validation and reliability testing of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

作者信息

Eubank Breda H, Mohtadi Nicholas G, Lafave Mark R, Wiley J Preston, Emery J C Herbert

机构信息

Department of Health and Physical Education, Faculty of Health, Community, and Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Sport Medicine Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):314-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.030
PMID:27727062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) was developed to evaluate quality of life in patients with rotator cuff disorders (RCD). The purpose of this study was to provide additional reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in accordance with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

METHODS

Preliminary patient interviews included 15 patients. Seventy patients (mean age, 58; standard deviation, 9 years) with RCD were evaluated. Methodology testing included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, content validity, and construct validity. Responsiveness, interpretability, and generalizability were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The Cronbach α was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.99; range, 0.72-0.94). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the RC-QOL was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85; range, 0.77-0.88). The standard error of measurement was 8 (range, 7-13). The smallest detectable change was 3 (range, 2-4). Content validity was confirmed through standardized patient interviews. All a priori hypotheses were confirmed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. The minimally clinical important difference ranged between 7 and 14 points. The study met the COSMIN criteria for interpretability and generalizability.

CONCLUSION

The RC-QOL is a reliable and valid measure of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic RCD. The results of this study added to the methodologic quality assessment of the RC-QOL, completing 7 of 10 COSMIN criteria.

摘要

背景

肩袖生活质量指数(RC-QOL)旨在评估肩袖疾病(RCD)患者的生活质量。本研究的目的是依据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,提供额外的信度、效度和反应度测试。

方法

初步患者访谈纳入了15名患者。对70例RCD患者(平均年龄58岁;标准差9岁)进行了评估。方法学测试包括内部一致性、重测信度、测量误差、内容效度和结构效度。还分析了反应度、可解释性和可推广性。

结果

Cronbach α为0.96(95%置信区间,0.89 - 0.99;范围,0.72 - 0.94)。RC-QOL的组内相关系数为0.87(95%置信区间,0.79 - 0.85;范围,0.77 - 0.88)。测量标准误为8(范围,7 - 13)。最小可检测变化为3(范围,2 - 4)。通过标准化患者访谈确认了内容效度。所有先验假设均得到证实。不存在地板效应或天花板效应。最小临床重要差异在7至14分之间。该研究符合COSMIN关于可解释性和可推广性的标准。

结论

RC-QOL是慢性RCD患者健康相关生活质量的可靠且有效的测量工具。本研究结果补充了RC-QOL的方法学质量评估,完成了10项COSMIN标准中的7项。

相似文献

1
Further validation and reliability testing of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,对肩袖生活质量指数(RC-QOL)进行进一步验证和可靠性测试。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):314-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
2
The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study.冈上肌肌腱病患者的 Western Ontario 肩袖指数:一项全面的可靠性和反应度验证研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1611-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512446591. Epub 2012 May 10.
3
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.中文版肩袖疾病生活质量指数(RC-QOL)在肩袖疾病患者中的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206347. eCollection 2018.
4
The responsiveness and validity of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL) index in a 2-year follow-up study.肩袖生活质量(RC-QOL)指数在一项为期2年的随访研究中的反应性和有效性。
JSES Int. 2022 May 16;6(4):604-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.012. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
[Translation and psychometric testing of the Rotator Cuff Quality-of-Life Measure (RC-QOL) for use in German-speaking regions].用于德语地区的肩袖生活质量量表(RC-QOL)的翻译及心理测量测试
Z Rheumatol. 2005 Apr;64(3):188-97. doi: 10.1007/s00393-005-0646-3.
6
Adaptation and transcultural translation of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life questionnaire into Spanish.将 Rotator Cuff 生活质量问卷改编并译为西班牙语。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):355-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Validation of the Polish version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.西安大略肩袖指数波兰语版本在关节镜下肩袖修复术后患者中的验证
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 12;19(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2238-9.
8
Turkish version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life questionnaire in rotator cuff-impaired patients.肩袖损伤患者的肩袖生活质量问卷土耳其语版本。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):591-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3290-0. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.美国肩肘外科医生主观肩关节评分量表在肩关节不稳定、肩袖疾病和盂肱关节炎患者中的信度、效度及反应度
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87(9):2006-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01624.
10
Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index.跨文化调适与希腊版西部安大略肩肘(WORC)指数的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jun;45(13):2175-2184. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2083704. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The responsiveness and validity of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL) index in a 2-year follow-up study.肩袖生活质量(RC-QOL)指数在一项为期2年的随访研究中的反应性和有效性。
JSES Int. 2022 May 16;6(4):604-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.012. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic repair of isolated and combined subscapularis tears: A single-center experience.关节镜下修复孤立性和合并性肩胛下肌撕裂的中期临床和影像学结果:单中心经验。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Dec;55(6):473-479. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20420.
3
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.
如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.
4
Cross-cultural adaptions and measurement properties of the WORC (Western Ontario rotator cuff index): a systematic review.WORC(安大略西部肩袖指数)的跨文化调适和测量特性:系统评价。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 29;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-1276-9.
5
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Index (RC-QOL) in patients with rotator cuff disorders.中文版肩袖疾病生活质量指数(RC-QOL)在肩袖疾病患者中的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206347. eCollection 2018.
6
Evaluating quality of care for patients with rotator cuff disorders.评估肩袖疾病患者的护理质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3375-4.