Suppr超能文献

采用全自动转录介导扩增法检测和定量HIV-1 RNA

Detection and quantification of HIV-1 RNA with a fully automated transcription-mediated-amplification assay.

作者信息

Sauné K, Raymond S, Boineau J, Pasquier C, Izopet J

机构信息

INSERM, U1043, Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France; CHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Laboratoire de Virologie, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Toulouse, France.

INSERM, U1043, Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, Toulouse, France; CHU Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, Laboratoire de Virologie, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2016 Nov;84:70-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nucleic acid testing is the major method used to monitor HIV viral load. Commercial systems based on real-time PCR assays are available for high-volume centralized laboratory testing, but they are not fully automated.

OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN

We have compared the diagnostic performance of the Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay (Aptima) (based on real-time TMA) on the Panther instrument, a fully-automated random access platform, to that of, the Roche Cobas Ampliprep Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HIV-1 version 2.0 (based on real-time PCR).

RESULTS

Probit analysis of replicate dilutions of NIBSC WHO International HIV-1 Standard, gave LODs of 8.6 c/ml for Aptima and 15.2 c/ml for CAP/CTM. The agreement between the assays was excellent when measuring HIV RNA in a calibrated reference (κ=0.90, p<0.001) and good when measuring clinical samples (κ=0.62, p<0.001). The correlation among the samples quantified by the two methods was very good (r=0.95, p<0.001) and the mean difference between the values obtained with the two assays was 0.02 log c/ml for B and non-B subtypes. The vast majority of results showed <0.5 log variance between the two assays (89%); only one sample showed results that differed by over 1.0 log c/ml.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the new fully automated Aptima assay is adequate for clinical monitoring of HIV-1 RNA during infections and treatment. The Aptima assay is well suited for routine laboratory use.

摘要

背景

核酸检测是监测HIV病毒载量的主要方法。基于实时PCR检测的商业系统可用于大容量集中实验室检测,但它们并非完全自动化。

目的和研究设计

我们比较了在全自动化随机存取平台Panther仪器上的Hologic Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx检测法(Aptima,基于实时转录介导扩增法)与罗氏Cobas Ampliprep Cobas TaqMan(CAP/CTM)HIV-1 2.0版检测法(基于实时PCR)的诊断性能。

结果

对NIBSC世界卫生组织国际HIV-1标准品的重复稀释液进行概率分析,得出Aptima检测法的检测下限为8.6拷贝/毫升,CAP/CTM检测法为15.2拷贝/毫升。在校准参考品中测量HIV RNA时,两种检测法之间的一致性极佳(κ=0.90,p<0.001),在测量临床样本时一致性良好(κ=0.62,p<0.001)。两种方法定量的样本之间的相关性非常好(r=0.95,p<0.001),两种检测法所得值之间的平均差异对于B和非B亚型为0.02 log拷贝/毫升。绝大多数结果显示两种检测法之间的差异<0.5 log(89%);只有一个样本的结果差异超过1.0 log拷贝/毫升。

结论

新型全自动化Aptima检测法的性能足以用于HIV-1感染和治疗期间RNA的临床监测。Aptima检测法非常适合常规实验室使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验