de Felício Cláudia Maria, da Silva Dias Franciele Voltarelli, Folha Gislaine Aparecida, de Almeida Leila Azevedo, de Souza Jaqueline Freitas, Anselmo-Lima Wilma Terezinha, Trawitzki Luciana Vitaliano Voi, Valera Fabiana Cardoso Pereira
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; Craniofacial Research Support Center, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil; Craniofacial Research Support Center, University of São Paulo - USP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
The purposes of this study were (1) to identify possible differences in muscular and orofacial functions between children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and with primary snoring (PS); (2) to examine the standardized difference between normal values of myofunctional scores and those of subjects with OSA or PS; and (3) to identify the features associated with OSA.
Participants were 39 children (mean age 8 ± 1.2 years) of which, 27 had a diagnosis of OSA and 12 had PS. All participants were examined by an otorhinolaryngologist and underwent overnight polysomnography. Orofacial characteristics were determined through a validated protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores (OMES), surface electromyography of masticatory muscles, and measurements of maximal lip and tongue strength. Reference values in the OMES were included to quantify the standardized difference (effect size = ES) relative to the groups studied and in the regression analysis.
The OSA group had lower scores in breathing and deglutition, more unbalanced masticatory muscle activities than PS group (P < 0.05), but both groups had similar reductions in orofacial strength. OSA had a large ES (Cohen's d > 0.8) in all analysed OMES scores, while PS group showed small and medium differences in breathing and mastication scores, respectively. The mobility of the stomatognathic components score was the most important to contribute for group status (57%, P < 0.0001) in the regression analysis.
Children with tonsillar hypertrophy and OSA had relevant impairments in orofacial functions and lesser muscular coordination than children with PS.
本研究的目的是:(1)确定阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)儿童与原发性打鼾(PS)儿童在肌肉和口面部功能方面可能存在的差异;(2)检查肌功能评分正常值与OSA或PS受试者评分之间的标准化差异;(3)确定与OSA相关的特征。
研究对象为39名儿童(平均年龄8±1.2岁),其中27名被诊断为OSA,12名患有PS。所有参与者均由耳鼻喉科医生进行检查,并接受整夜多导睡眠图监测。通过经过验证的口面部肌功能评估方案(OMES)、咀嚼肌表面肌电图以及最大唇舌力量测量来确定口面部特征。纳入OMES的参考值以量化相对于所研究组的标准化差异(效应大小=ES)并用于回归分析。
OSA组在呼吸和吞咽方面的得分较低,咀嚼肌活动比PS组更不平衡(P<0.05),但两组口面部力量的降低程度相似。OSA在所有分析的OMES评分中均有较大的ES(科恩d>0.8),而PS组在呼吸和咀嚼评分中分别显示出小和中等差异。在回归分析中,口颌系统各组成部分的活动度评分对分组状态的贡献最为重要(57%,P<0.0001)。
与PS儿童相比,扁桃体肥大和OSA儿童在口面部功能方面存在相关损害,肌肉协调性较差。