Seheult J N, Triulzi D J, Alarcon L H, Sperry J L, Murdock A, Yazer M H
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transfus Med. 2017 Feb;27(1):30-35. doi: 10.1111/tme.12372. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The safety of administering uncrossmatched, group O, cold-stored, whole blood (cWB) during civilian trauma resuscitation was evaluated.
METHODS/MATERIALS: Male trauma patients with haemorrhage-induced hypotension who received leuko-reduced uncrossmatched group O+, low titre (<50) anti-A and -B, platelet-replete cWB during initial resuscitation were included. The biochemical markers of haemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase, total bilirubin, haptoglobin, creatinine, serum potassium) were measured on the day of cWB receipt (day 0), and over the next 2 days, reports of transfusion reactions and total blood product administration in first 24 h of admission were recorded.
There were 27 non-group O and 17 group O cWB recipients. The median number of cWB units transfused was 1 [interquartile range (IQR): 1-2] in both groups. The median day 0 post-transfusion serum total bilirubin concentration, although still in the normal range, was higher in the non-group O versus group O recipients (1·4 versus 0·5 mg/dL, P < 0·01). There were no significant differences in any of the other biochemical parameters at any other time point. Non-group O recipients received a median of 3 times more red blood cell (RBC) units compared with group O recipients (P = 0·01 RBCs), likely explaining the bilirubin difference on day 0. The median volume of ABO-incompatible plasma transfused to non-group O recipients was 600 mL (IQR: 300-1140 mL). There were no reports of adverse events related to the cWB transfusion in either group.
Administration of ≤2 units of cWB in civilian trauma resuscitation was not associated with clinically significant changes in laboratory haemolysis markers. Efficacy will be determined when larger quantities are transfused.
背景/目的:评估在平民创伤复苏期间输注未交叉配血的O型冷存全血(cWB)的安全性。
方法/材料:纳入在初始复苏期间接受了白细胞滤除的未交叉配血O+型、低滴度(<50)抗A和抗B、富含血小板的cWB的出血性低血压男性创伤患者。在输注cWB当天(第0天)以及接下来的2天测量溶血的生化标志物(乳酸脱氢酶、总胆红素、触珠蛋白、肌酐、血清钾),记录输血反应报告以及入院后前24小时内输注的全血制品总量。
有27名非O型cWB接受者和17名O型cWB接受者。两组输注cWB的单位数中位数均为1[四分位间距(IQR):1 - 2]。输血后第0天血清总胆红素浓度中位数,虽然仍在正常范围内,但非O型接受者高于O型接受者(1.4对0.5mg/dL,P<0.01)。在任何其他时间点,其他任何生化参数均无显著差异。非O型接受者接受的红细胞(RBC)单位数中位数比O型接受者多3倍(P = 0.01 RBC),这可能解释了第0天的胆红素差异。输注给非O型接受者的ABO血型不相容血浆的中位数体积为600mL(IQR:300 - 1140mL)。两组均未报告与cWB输血相关的不良事件。
在平民创伤复苏中输注≤2单位的cWB与实验室溶血标志物的临床显著变化无关。输注更大数量时的疗效将另行确定。