Walsh Mark, Moore Ernest E, Moore Hunter B, Thomas Scott, Kwaan Hau C, Speybroeck Jacob, Marsee Mathew, Bunch Connor M, Stillson John, Thomas Anthony V, Grisoli Annie, Aversa John, Fulkerson Daniel, Vande Lune Stefani, Sjeklocha Lucas, Tran Quincy K
Notre Dame Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA.
Departments of Emergency & Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 17;10(2):320. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020320.
This narrative review explores the pathophysiology, geographic variation, and historical developments underlying the selection of fixed ratio versus whole blood resuscitation for hemorrhaging trauma patients. We also detail a physiologically driven and goal-directed alternative to fixed ratio and whole blood, whereby viscoelastic testing guides the administration of blood components and factor concentrates to the severely bleeding trauma patient. The major studies of each resuscitation method are highlighted, and upcoming comparative trials are detailed.
本叙述性综述探讨了在出血性创伤患者中选择固定比例复苏与全血复苏的病理生理学、地域差异及历史发展情况。我们还详细介绍了一种基于生理驱动且目标导向的固定比例和全血复苏替代方案,即通过粘弹性检测指导向严重出血创伤患者输注血液成分和凝血因子浓缩剂。文中突出了每种复苏方法的主要研究,并详述了即将开展的对比试验。