Richbourg Heather A, Martin Matthew J, Schachner Emma R, McNulty Margaret A
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 Mar;300(3):450-459. doi: 10.1002/ar.23493. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Rodent models are used for a variety of orthopedic research applications; however, anatomy references include mostly artistic representations. Advanced imaging techniques, including micro-computed tomography (microCT), can provide more accurate representations of subtle anatomical characteristics. A recent microCT atlas of laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) anatomy depicts the central and tarsal bone III (T3) as a single bone, differing from previous references. Fusion of tarsal bones is generally characterized as pathological secondary to mutations associated with growth factors, and normal variation has not been documented in the mouse tarsus. Therefore, it is unclear if this fusion is a normal or a pathological characteristic. The aim of this study is to characterize the tarsus of the laboratory mouse and compare it to the rat and selected outgroup species (i.e., white-footed mouse) via microCT and histology to determine if the central and T3 are separate or fused into a single bone. Laboratory mice (C57/Bl6 [n = 17] and BalbC [n = 2]) and rats (n = 5) were scanned with microCT. A representative laboratory mouse from each strain was evaluated histologically via serial sagittal sections through the mid-tarsus. General pedal anatomy was similar between all species; however, the central and T3 bones were fused in all laboratory mice but not the rat or white-footed mouse. A band of hyaline cartilage was identified within the fused bone of the laboratory mice. We conclude that the fusion found is a normal characteristic in laboratory mice, but timing of the fusion remains ambiguous. Anat Rec, 300:450-459, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
啮齿动物模型被用于各种骨科研究应用;然而,解剖学参考文献大多是艺术呈现。先进的成像技术,包括微型计算机断层扫描(microCT),能够更准确地呈现细微的解剖特征。最近一份实验室小鼠(小家鼠)解剖学的microCT图谱将中央骨和跗骨III(T3)描绘为一块单一的骨头,这与之前的参考文献不同。跗骨融合通常被认为是与生长因子相关突变继发的病理性改变,而小鼠跗骨的正常变异尚未见报道。因此,尚不清楚这种融合是正常特征还是病理特征。本研究的目的是通过microCT和组织学对实验室小鼠的跗骨进行特征描述,并将其与大鼠及选定的外群物种(即白足鼠)进行比较,以确定中央骨和T3是分开的还是融合成一块单一的骨头。用microCT对实验室小鼠(C57/Bl6 [n = 17]和BalbC [n = 2])以及大鼠(n = 5)进行扫描。对每个品系的一只代表性实验室小鼠通过经跗骨中部的连续矢状切片进行组织学评估。所有物种的一般足部解剖结构相似;然而,所有实验室小鼠的中央骨和T3骨是融合的,而大鼠和白足鼠则不是。在实验室小鼠的融合骨内发现了一层透明软骨带。我们得出结论,所发现的融合是实验室小鼠的正常特征,但融合的时间仍不明确。《解剖学记录》,300:450 - 459,2017年。© 2016威利期刊公司。