Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Department of Biochemistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):611-617. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12549. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
To compare crestal bone loss around dental implants using a delayed loading protocol. Bone loss was compared in patients following conventional full thickness flap and flapless surgery in controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
Eighty-eight type 2 diabetic patients satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for this single center, parallel group study after obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group I consisted of patients undergoing full thickness flap surgery for implant placement, and group II consisted of patients undergoing flapless surgery for implant placement. The mean age, duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, and male-to-female ratio in both groups were matched and compared statistically. Dental implants were placed followed by delayed loading (4 months) in both groups. Crestal bone loss was assessed with intraoral periapical radiographs with the help of computer software (DBSWIN viewer). Actual implant length acted as the radiographic index, and implant-abutment junctions were used as a reference point for all measurements. Mesial and distal bone levels at baseline, 6, and 12 months post implant placement of the two groups were determined. Mesial and distal crestal bone loss from baseline to 6 and 12 months were calculated and compared with Tukey test using SPSS v15.0 statistical analysis software.
Tukey test revealed similar (not statistically different) mean mesial crestal bone loss between the two groups after 6 months (0.47 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.576) and after 12 months (1.56 ± 0.25 mm vs. 1.50 ± 0.22 mm, p = 0.891). The mean distal bone loss resulting between the two groups was not statistically different at 6 months (0.44 ± 0.08 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.12 mm, p = 0.687) and at 12 months (1.57 ± 0.23 mm vs. 1.61 ± 0.22 mm, p = 0.947).
The results of this clinical randomized control trial indicated that in controlled type 2 diabetic patients, levels of crestal bone loss around dental implants placed following conventional full thickness flap surgery was comparable to crestal bone loss around dental implants placed with the flapless surgical technique. More clinical studies are required regarding controlled type 2 diabetics with larger sample sizes, for long time periods to obtain more predictable results.
比较延迟加载方案中使用牙种植体的牙槽嵴骨丧失。比较常规全厚瓣和无瓣手术的患者在 2 型糖尿病患者中的骨丢失情况。
在获得机构审查委员会批准和知情同意后,选择 88 名符合预定纳入和排除标准的 2 型糖尿病患者进行这项单中心、平行组研究。这些患者被随机分为两组。组 I 包括接受全厚瓣手术进行种植体放置的患者,组 II 包括接受无瓣手术进行种植体放置的患者。两组的平均年龄、糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白水平和男女比例均匹配,并进行统计学比较。两组均在植入物后 4 个月进行延迟加载(4 个月)。使用计算机软件(DBSWIN 查看器)通过口腔根尖射线照相评估牙槽嵴骨丢失。实际的种植体长度作为放射学指数,种植体-基台连接用作所有测量的参考点。确定两组基线、植入后 6 个月和 12 个月的近中和远中骨水平。从基线到 6 个月和 12 个月,计算并比较近中和远中牙槽嵴骨丢失量,并使用 SPSS v15.0 统计分析软件进行 Tukey 检验。
Tukey 检验显示,两组在 6 个月(0.47 ± 0.08 毫米比 0.36 ± 0.13 毫米,p = 0.576)和 12 个月(1.56 ± 0.25 毫米比 1.50 ± 0.22 毫米,p = 0.891)时的近中牙槽嵴骨丢失的平均水平相似(无统计学差异)。两组在 6 个月(0.44 ± 0.08 毫米比 0.35 ± 0.12 毫米,p = 0.687)和 12 个月(1.57 ± 0.23 毫米比 1.61 ± 0.22 毫米,p = 0.947)时的远中骨丢失平均水平无统计学差异。
这项临床随机对照试验的结果表明,在 2 型糖尿病得到控制的患者中,常规全厚瓣手术后种植体周围牙槽嵴骨的丧失水平与无瓣手术技术后种植体周围牙槽嵴骨的丧失水平相当。需要进行更多关于 2 型糖尿病患者的更大样本量、更长时间的临床研究,以获得更可预测的结果。