Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California2Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jan 1;152(1):82-88. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3466.
Patients with periampullary adenocarcinomas have widely variable survival. These cancers are traditionally categorized by their anatomic location of origin, namely, the duodenum, ampulla, distal common bile duct (CBD), or head of the pancreas. However, they can be alternatively subdivided histopathologically into intestinal or pancreaticobiliary (PB) types, which may more accurately estimate prognosis.
To identify factors associated with survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinomas and to compare survival between those having intestinal-type or PB-type cancers originating from the duodenum, ampulla, or distal CBD with those having pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a retrospective analysis of medical records in a prospectively maintained database. Three pathologists separately evaluated histopathologic phenotypes at a university-based tertiary referral center. Study participants were all patients (N = 510) who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma between January 1995 and December 2014.
Overall survival.
This study identified 510 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.1 [10.9] years; 245 female [48%]) who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinomas: 13 duodenal, 110 ampullary, 43 distal CBD, and 344 PDAC. The median overall survival was 61.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 22.0-111.0), 70.4 (IQR, 26.7-147.7), 40.6 (IQR, 15.2-59.6), and 31.4 (IQR, 17.3-86.3) months for patients with cancers of the duodenum, ampulla, distal CBD, or pancreas, respectively (P = .01), indicating a significant difference between the 4 tumor anatomic locations. Most duodenal (61.5% [8 of 13]) and ampullary (51.8% [57 of 110]) cancers were intestinal type, and most distal CBD tumors were PB type (86.0% [37 of 43]). Those with intestinal-type duodenal, ampullary, or distal CBD adenocarcinomas had longer median overall survival than those with PB type (71.7 vs 33.3 months, P = .02) or PDAC (31.4 months, P = .003). There was no survival difference between PB-type cancers and PDAC (33.3 vs 31.4 months, P = .66). On multivariable analysis, histologic grade (hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.56-2.52; P < .001), histopathologic phenotype (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.16-2.64; P = .008), and nodal status (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.87; P = .05) were significantly associated with survival, while anatomic location was not.
Histopathologic phenotype is a better prognosticator of survival in patients with periampullary adenocarcinomas than tumor anatomic location. Those with PB-type duodenal, ampullary, or distal CBD adenocarcinomas have survival similar to those with PDAC.
具有胰周腺癌的患者具有广泛不同的生存。这些癌症传统上按其起源的解剖位置分类,即十二指肠、壶腹、远端胆总管(CBD)或胰头。然而,它们也可以通过组织病理学方法分为肠型或胰胆管型(PB 型),这可能更准确地估计预后。
确定与胰周腺癌患者生存相关的因素,并比较源自十二指肠、壶腹或远端 CBD 的肠型或 PB 型癌症与胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的生存。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在一个前瞻性维护的数据库中进行的病历回顾性分析。三位病理学家分别在一个大学三级转诊中心评估组织病理学表型。研究参与者均为 1995 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗腺癌的所有患者(N=510)。
总生存。
本研究确定了 510 名(平均[SD]年龄,66.1[10.9]岁;245 名女性[48%])接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗腺癌的患者:13 名十二指肠癌,110 名壶腹癌,43 名远端 CBD 癌和 344 名 PDAC。十二指肠癌、壶腹癌、远端 CBD 癌和胰腺癌患者的中位总生存时间分别为 61.2(四分位距[IQR],22.0-111.0)、70.4(IQR,26.7-147.7)、40.6(IQR,15.2-59.6)和 31.4(IQR,17.3-86.3)个月(P=.01),表明 4 种肿瘤解剖部位之间存在显著差异。大多数十二指肠(61.5%[8 例 13 例])和壶腹(51.8%[57 例 110 例])癌为肠型,大多数远端 CBD 肿瘤为 PB 型(86.0%[37 例 43 例])。具有肠型十二指肠、壶腹或远端 CBD 腺癌的患者中位总生存时间长于 PB 型(71.7 个月比 33.3 个月,P=.02)或 PDAC(31.4 个月,P=.003)。PB 型癌症与 PDAC 之间无生存差异(33.3 个月比 31.4 个月,P=.66)。多变量分析显示,组织学分级(危险比[HR],1.98;95%CI,1.56-2.52;P<.001)、组织病理学表型(HR,1.75;95%CI,1.16-2.64;P=.008)和淋巴结状态(HR,1.45;95%CI,1.12-1.87;P=.05)与生存显著相关,而解剖位置则不然。
在胰周腺癌患者中,组织病理学表型是比肿瘤解剖位置更好的生存预后因素。具有 PB 型十二指肠、壶腹或远端 CBD 腺癌的患者的生存与 PDAC 患者相似。