Suppr超能文献

使用索普罗生命相机检测咬合面龋损:一项系统评价。

Detection of Occlusal Carious Lesion using the SoproLife Camera: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Doméjean Sophie, Rongier Julie, Muller-Bolla Michéle

机构信息

Département Odontologie Conservatrice. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France ; Univ Clermontl, UFR d'Odontologie ; Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France, email:

Département Odontologie Conservatrice. CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Hôtel-Dieu, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France ; Univ Clermontl, UFR d'Odontologie ; Centre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique EA 4847, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):774-779. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1928.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the scientific evidence regarding the ability of a recently developed light fluorescence device, SoproLife (Sopro-Acteon group, La Ciotat, France) in detecting occlusal carious lesions. The PubMed database was searched for trials that evaluated the validity of the SoproLife camera for the detection of occlusal carious lesions. Among the 11 articles originally identified with the keyword "Soprolife," only three articles were included. The three included surveys used the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)-II criteria as gold standard for the assessment of SoproLife compared or not to other detection devices (DIAGNOdent and Spectra Caries Detection Aid). Two of the included studies reported only on permanent teeth or both primary and permanent teeth. The SoproLife validity values varied markedly among studies with a sensitivity ranging between 0.43 and 0.95 and a specificity between 0.55 and 1. Interobserver reproducibility with the SoproLife was reported in two of the three studies (0.98 and 0.72) and none of the studies reported about intraobserver reproducibility. No clear-cut conclusion can be made based on the three included clinical studies; further investigations are needed to confirm the validity of the SoproLife camera in terms of detection of occlusal carious lesions.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是评估一种最近研发的光荧光设备SoproLife(法国拉西奥塔索普罗-阿克松集团)检测咬合面龋损的科学证据。在PubMed数据库中检索评估SoproLife相机检测咬合面龋损有效性的试验。在最初通过关键词“Soprolife”检索到的11篇文章中,仅纳入了3篇文章。这3篇纳入的研究将国际龋病检测与评估系统(ICDAS)-II标准作为评估SoproLife的金标准,与其他检测设备(DIAGNOdent和Spectra龋病检测辅助设备)进行或未进行比较。其中两项纳入研究仅报道了恒牙或同时报道了乳牙和恒牙。SoproLife的有效性值在不同研究中差异显著,敏感性在0.43至0.95之间,特异性在0.55至1之间。三项研究中的两项报告了SoproLife的观察者间再现性(0.98和0.72),且没有研究报告观察者内再现性。基于这三项纳入的临床研究无法得出明确结论;需要进一步研究以证实SoproLife相机在检测咬合面龋损方面的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验