Suppr超能文献

使用国际龋病检测和评估系统(ICDAS)以及两种基于荧光的口腔内装置检查咬合面。

Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.

作者信息

Theocharopoulou A, Lagerweij M D, van Strijp A J

机构信息

Department of Cariology Endodontology Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):51-5.

Abstract

AIM

The aims of this study were to assess the inter-examiner reliability of ICDAS and Soprolife intra-oral camera ex vivo using 5 examiners and to compare in vivo the validity of two fluorescence-based intra-oral devices in examining occlusal surfaces with early carious lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven occlusal surfaces of posterior primary and permanent teeth of 20 children were examined using Diagnodent pen (KaVo, Biberach/Riß, Germany) and Soprolife (Acteon Group, La Ciotat, France) fluorescence intra-oral camera. The white light photos, made by Soprolife camera, were evaluated using ICDAS scores and the Soprolife fluorescence photos were scored as sound, enamel caries and dentine caries by 5 experienced dentists. The dentists were trained for the use of ICDAS system with a short online training programme (ICDAS.org) and for the scoring of caries on the fluorescence images with example images.

STATISTICS

cut-offs were made for ICDAS, Soprolife and Diagnodent to distinguish sound surfaces and enamel caries from dentinal caries. The inter-examiner reliability was calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

On white light images the examiners found 16 enamel caries and 21 dentine caries with the ICDAS system. On the Soprolife fluorescent images 24 enamel lesions, 9 dentine lesions and 4 sound surfaces were observed. The inter-examiner reliability (ICC) of the ICDAS system on white light photographs and of Soprolife on the fluorescent images for average measures was 0.70 and 0.72, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Soprolife (95%CI) was 0.43 and 1.0 respectively, using ICDAS as a reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of Diagnodent (95%CI) was 0.62 and 0.81 respectively.

CONCLUSION

A short training of dentists in the use the ICDAS system resulted in satisfactory inter-examiner reliability for the analysis of occlusal lesions on white light images. Soprolife and Diagnodent do not contribute to a better detection of early carious lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用5名检查者对离体牙齿进行ICDAS和Soprolife口腔内摄像头检查时检查者间的可靠性,并在体内比较两种基于荧光的口腔内装置在检查有早期龋损的咬合面时的有效性。

材料与方法

使用Diagnodent笔(德国卡瓦公司,比伯拉赫/里斯)和Soprolife(法国阿克松集团,拉西奥塔)荧光口腔内摄像头检查了20名儿童的37颗乳牙和恒牙的后牙咬合面。由Soprolife摄像头拍摄的白光照片使用ICDAS评分进行评估,5名经验丰富的牙医将Soprolife荧光照片评为正常、釉质龋和牙本质龋。这些牙医通过一个简短的在线培训课程(ICDAS.org)接受了ICDAS系统使用培训,并通过示例图像接受了荧光图像上龋损评分的培训。

统计学方法

为区分正常表面和釉质龋与牙本质龋,对ICDAS、Soprolife和Diagnodent设定了临界值。使用组内相关系数计算检查者间的可靠性。

结果

在白光图像上,检查者使用ICDAS系统发现了16处釉质龋和21处牙本质龋。在Soprolife荧光图像上,观察到24处釉质病变、9处牙本质病变和4个正常表面。ICDAS系统在白光照片上以及Soprolife在荧光图像上的平均测量检查者间可靠性(ICC)分别为0.70和0.72。以ICDAS作为参考标准,Soprolife的敏感性和特异性(95%CI)分别为0.43和1.0。Diagnodent的敏感性和特异性(95%CI)分别为0.62和0.81。

结论

对牙医进行简短的ICDAS系统使用培训后,在分析白光图像上的咬合病变时,检查者间的可靠性令人满意。Soprolife和Diagnodent对早期龋损的更好检测并无帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验