Bronnikov V A, Smychec V B, Mavlikaeva Yu A, Kravtzov Y I, Sklyannaya K A, Plotnikova O A, Vildeman A V
Wagner Perm State University of Medicine, Perm, Russia; Perm Regional Complex Rehabilitation Centre, Perm, Russia.
Republican Scientific and Practical Centre of Medical Expertise and Rehabilitation, Minsk, Belarus.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2016;116(9):30-34. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20161169130-34.
To compare the efficacy of complex rehabilitation in patients receiving robotic kinesiotherapy and conventional physical therapy.
In total 68 patients were examined, including 37 patients receiving traditional kinesiotherapy and sessions on the robotic complex 'Locomat' and 31 patients of the control group who received conventional physical therapy.
There were statistical between-group differences in the indices of mobility, physical capabilities, strength and muscle tone in paretic extremities as well as the overall improvement of daily activity. The use of robotic devices has a positive impact on the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients.
比较接受机器人运动疗法和传统物理疗法的患者进行综合康复的疗效。
共检查了68例患者，其中37例接受传统运动疗法和机器人综合训练“Locomat”治疗，31例对照组患者接受传统物理治疗。
在患侧肢体的活动能力、身体功能、力量和肌张力指标以及日常活动的总体改善方面，组间存在统计学差异。使用机器人设备对中风后患者的康复有积极影响。
