Voiosu T, Tanţău Alina, Voiosu A, Benguş Andreea, Mocanu Cristina, Smarandache Bianca, Baicuş C, Vişovan Ioana, Mateescu B
Rom J Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(1):36-43. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2016-0047.
Optimal bowel preparation is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of colonoscopy. Several patient-related factors are known to influence the quality of bowel cleansing but randomized trials in this area are lacking. We aimed to compare an individualized bowel prep strategy based on patient characteristics to a standard preparation regimen.
We conducted an endoscopist-blinded multicenter randomized control-trial. The Boston Bowel Prep Score (BBPS) was used to assess quality of bowel preparation and a 10 point visual analogue scale to assess patient comfort during bowel prep. Patients were randomised to either the standard regimens of split-dose 4L polyethylene-glycol (group A), split-dose sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (group B) or to either of the two depending on their responses to a 3-item questionnaire (individualized preparation, group C).
185 patients were randomized during the study period and 143 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients in the individualized group had a median BBPS of 7 compared to a median of 6 in the standard group (p = 0.7). Also, there was no significant difference in patients' comfort scores, irrespective of study group or laxative regimen. However, on multivariable analysis, a split-dose 4L polyethylene-glycol was an independent predictor for achieving a BBPS>6 (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4-9.8), regardless of patient-related factors.
The choice of laxative seems to be more important than patient-related factors in predicting bowel cleansing. Comfort during bowel prep is not influenced by the type of strategy used.
最佳肠道准备是影响结肠镜检查质量的最重要因素之一。已知有几个与患者相关的因素会影响肠道清洁质量,但该领域缺乏随机试验。我们旨在比较基于患者特征的个体化肠道准备策略与标准准备方案。
我们进行了一项内镜医师盲法多中心随机对照试验。采用波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)评估肠道准备质量,并用10分视觉模拟量表评估肠道准备期间患者的舒适度。患者被随机分为标准方案组,即分剂量服用4L聚乙二醇(A组)、分剂量服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁(B组),或根据他们对一份包含3个项目的问卷的回答分为上述两组中的任意一组(个体化准备,C组)。
在研究期间,185例患者被随机分组,143例患者纳入最终分析。个体化组患者的BBPS中位数为7,而标准组为6(p = 0.7)。此外,无论研究组或泻药方案如何,患者的舒适度评分均无显著差异。然而,多变量分析显示,无论患者相关因素如何,分剂量服用4L聚乙二醇是实现BBPS>6的独立预测因素(OR 3.7,95% CI 1.4 - 9.8)。
在预测肠道清洁方面,泻药的选择似乎比患者相关因素更重要。肠道准备期间的舒适度不受所用策略类型的影响。