Melsen B, Agerbaek N, Markenstam G
Department of Orthodontics, Royal Dental College, Aarhus, Denmark.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Sep;96(3):232-41. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90460-5.
Elongated and spaced incisors are common problems in patients suffering from severe periodontal disease. Thirty patients characterized by marginal bone loss and deep overbite were treated by intrusion of incisors. Three different methods for intrusion were applied: (1) J hooks and extraoral high-pull headgear, (2) utility arches, (3) intrusion bent into a loop in a 0.17 x 0.25-inch wire, and (4) base arch as described by Burstone. The intrusion was evaluated from the displacement of the apex, incision, and the center of resistance of the most prominent or elongated central incisor. Change in the marginal bone level and the amount of root resorption were evaluated on standardized intraoral radiographs. The pockets were assessed by standardized probing and the clinical crown length was measured on study casts. The results showed that the true intrusion of the center of resistance varied from 0 to 3.5 mm and was most pronounced when intrusion was performed with a base arch. The clinical crown length was generally reduced by 0.5 to 1.0 mm. The marginal bone level approached the cementoenamel junction in all but six cases. All cases demonstrated root resorption varying from 1 to 3 mm. The total amount of alveolar support--that is, the calculated area of the alveolar wall--was unaltered or increased in 19 of the 30 cases. The dependency of the results on the oral hygiene, the force distribution, and the perioral function was evaluated in relation to the individual cases. It was obvious that intrusion was best performed when (1) forces were low (5 to 15 gm per tooth) with the line of action of the force passing through or close to the center of resistance, (2) the gingiva status was healthy, and (3) no interference with perioral function was present.
门牙伸长和间隙过大是重度牙周病患者的常见问题。30例以边缘骨丧失和深覆合为特征的患者接受了门牙压入治疗。采用了三种不同的压入方法:(1)J形钩和口外高位牵引头帽,(2)功能弓,(3)在0.17×0.25英寸的钢丝上弯成圈状的压入曲,(4)如Burstone所描述的基弓。通过最突出或伸长的中切牙的根尖、切端和抗力中心的位移来评估压入情况。在标准化的口腔X光片上评估边缘骨水平的变化和牙根吸收量。通过标准化探诊评估牙周袋,并在研究模型上测量临床冠长度。结果显示,抗力中心的实际压入量在0至3.5毫米之间变化,使用基弓进行压入时最为明显。临床冠长度通常减少0.5至1.0毫米。除6例病例外,所有病例的边缘骨水平均接近牙骨质釉质界。所有病例均显示牙根吸收在1至3毫米之间。30例病例中有19例的牙槽骨支持总量(即牙槽壁的计算面积)未改变或增加。根据个别病例评估了结果与口腔卫生、力的分布和口周功能的相关性。很明显,在以下情况下进行压入效果最佳:(1)力较低(每颗牙5至15克),力的作用线穿过或靠近抗力中心,(2)牙龈状况健康,(3)不存在对口周功能的干扰。