Ceylan Cavit, Tonyali Senol, Keles Ibrahim
Department of Urology, Clinic of Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Clinic of Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Oct;32(10):514-517. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
This study aimed to determine the effect of surgical margin positivity on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). The medical records of all patients with locally advanced PCa that underwent RRP were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, digital rectal examination findings, prostate biopsy Gleason score, prostate volume, pre- and post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, definitive pathology Gleason score, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, absence or presence of BCR, and the time to BCR were analyzed. The study included 130 patients. The final pathologic examination showed that seven (5.4%) patients had T3a disease and 123 (94.6%) had T3b disease. In all, 93 (71.5%) patients had a positive surgical margin [SM(+)], whereas 37 (28.5%) patients had a negative surgical margin [SM(-)]. Among the seven patients with pT3a disease, four (57.1%) had SM(+), whereas 89 (72.4%) of the 123 patients with pT3b disease had SM(-). BCR occurred in 11.8% (11 of 93) of patients with SM(+) and in 45.9% (17 of 37) of those with SM(-) (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SM(+) was the only significant predictor of BCR following RRP (relative risk, 0.163; 95% confidence interval (0.062-0.433); p < 0.001). SM(+) in RRP specimens is not always indicative of BCR in patients with locally advanced PCa. RRP should be considered an effective treatment choice for selected patients with locally advanced PCa, despite the associated high SM(+) rate.
本研究旨在确定接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)的局部晚期前列腺癌(PCa)患者手术切缘阳性对生化复发(BCR)的影响。对所有接受RRP的局部晚期PCa患者的病历进行回顾性分析。分析患者的人口统计学资料、直肠指检结果、前列腺穿刺活检Gleason评分、前列腺体积、治疗前后前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、最终病理Gleason评分、手术切缘状态、精囊侵犯、神经周围侵犯、有无BCR以及BCR发生时间。该研究纳入了130例患者。最终病理检查显示,7例(5.4%)患者为T3a期疾病,123例(94.6%)为T3b期疾病。总共有93例(71.5%)患者手术切缘阳性[SM(+)],而37例(28.5%)患者手术切缘阴性[SM(-)]。在7例pT3a期疾病患者中,4例(57.1%)为SM(+),而在123例pT3b期疾病患者中,89例(72.4%)为SM(-)。SM(+)患者中11.8%(93例中的11例)发生BCR,SM(-)患者中45.9%(37例中的17例)发生BCR(p<0.001)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,SM(+)是RRP术后BCR的唯一显著预测因素(相对风险,0.163;95%置信区间(0.062 - 0.433);p<0.001)。RRP标本中的SM(+)并不总是预示局部晚期PCa患者会发生BCR。尽管RRP相关的SM(+)率较高,但对于部分局部晚期PCa患者,RRP仍应被视为一种有效的治疗选择。