• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAPRA-S 评分:一种用于改善根治性前列腺切除术预后预测的简单工具。

The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5039-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26169. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26169
PMID:21647869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors previously developed and validated the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to predict prostate cancer recurrence based on pretreatment clinical data. They aimed to develop a similar postsurgical score with improved accuracy via incorporation of pathologic data.

METHODS

A total of 3837 prostatectomy patients in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE™) national disease registry were analyzed. Cox regression was used to determine the predictive power of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic Gleason score (pGS), surgical margins (SM), extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node invasion (LNI). Points were assigned based on the relative weights of these variables in predicting recurrence. The new postsurgical score (CAPRA-S) was tested and compared with a commonly cited nomogram with proportional hazards analysis, concordance (c) index, calibration plots, and decision-curve analysis.

RESULTS

Recurrence appeared in 16.8% of the men; actuarial progression-free probability at 5 years was 78.0%. The CAPRA-S was determined by adding up to 3 points for PSA, up to 3 points for pGS, 1 point each for ECE and LNI, and 2 points each for SM and SVI. The hazard ratio for each point increase in CAPRA-S score was 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.59), indicating a 2.4-fold increase in risk for each 2-point increase in score. The CAPRA-S c-index was 0.77, substantially higher than 0.66 for the pretreatment CAPRA score and comparable to 0.76 for the nomogram. The CAPRA-S score performed better in both calibration and decision curve analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAPRA-S offers good discriminatory accuracy, calibration, and ease of calculation for clinical and research settings.

摘要

背景

作者先前开发并验证了前列腺癌风险评估(CAPRA)评分,该评分基于治疗前的临床数据预测前列腺癌复发。他们旨在通过纳入病理数据来开发一种具有更高准确性的类似术后评分。

方法

对癌症前列腺战略泌尿科研究努力(CaPSURE™)国家疾病登记处的 3837 例前列腺切除术患者进行了分析。Cox 回归用于确定术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、病理 Gleason 评分(pGS)、手术切缘(SM)、包膜外延伸(ECE)、精囊侵犯(SVI)和淋巴结侵犯(LNI)的预测能力。根据这些变量在预测复发中的相对权重为其分配分数。新的术后评分(CAPRA-S)通过比例风险分析、一致性(c)指数、校准图和决策曲线分析进行了测试和比较。

结果

16.8%的男性出现复发;5 年无进展生存概率为 78.0%。CAPRA-S 通过为 PSA 加 3 分、为 pGS 加 3 分、ECE 和 LNI 各加 1 分、SM 和 SVI 各加 2 分来确定。CAPRA-S 评分每增加 1 分,风险比为 1.54(95%置信区间,1.49-1.59),表明评分每增加 2 分,风险增加 2.4 倍。CAPRA-S 的 c 指数为 0.77,明显高于治疗前 CAPRA 评分的 0.66,与列线图的 0.76相当。CAPRA-S 评分在校准和决策曲线分析中表现更好。

结论

CAPRA-S 在临床和研究环境中具有良好的判别准确性、校准和计算简便性。

相似文献

1
The CAPRA-S score: A straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy.CAPRA-S 评分:一种用于改善根治性前列腺切除术预后预测的简单工具。
Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5039-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26169. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
2
The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校前列腺癌风险评估评分:根治性前列腺切除术后疾病复发的直接且可靠的术前预测指标。
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1938-42. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158155.33890.e7.
3
Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.CAPRA评分预测根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存率的有效性。来自欧洲1296例患者的多中心调查结果。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.043. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
4
Multi-institutional validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict disease recurrence and mortality after radical prostatectomy.多机构验证 CAPRA-S 评分在预测根治性前列腺切除术后疾病复发和死亡中的作用。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.058. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
5
Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.用于预测高危前列腺切除队列中前列腺癌死亡率的经验证的临床和基因组风险分层工具的综合价值。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.039. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
6
Evaluation of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy by cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score.通过前列腺癌术后风险评估(CAPRA-S)评分评估根治性前列腺切除术后无生化复发生存率。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2527-30. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2527.
7
Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中,关于包膜外侵犯、精囊侵犯及淋巴结受累的重要术前预后因素。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(3):369-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-0746-z.
8
Australian validation of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical score to predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.澳大利亚对前列腺癌风险评估术后评分进行验证,以预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生化复发情况。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Mar;88(3):E183-E188. doi: 10.1111/ans.13954. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.基于 MRI 的分期与病理分期预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Dec;221(6):773-787. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29609. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
PSA density does not improve predictive accuracy of the UCSF-CAPRA score.PSA 密度并不能提高 UCSF-CAPRA 评分的预测准确性。
Prostate. 2023 Jul;83(10):922-928. doi: 10.1002/pros.24533. Epub 2023 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Population-Specific Radiomics From Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in African American Men.基于双参数磁共振成像的特定人群放射组学改善非裔美国男性前列腺癌风险分层
JU Open Plus. 2025 Jul;3(7). doi: 10.1097/ju9.0000000000000310. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
2
A multimodal automated deep learning-based model for predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy from baseline MRI, Presurgical clinical covariates.一种基于多模态自动化深度学习的模型,用于根据基线MRI、术前临床协变量预测前列腺切除术后前列腺癌的生化复发。
Clin Imaging. 2025 Oct;126:110579. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110579. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
3
Diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning in predicting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.机器学习在预测前列腺癌生化复发中的诊断性系统评价与荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11445-5.
4
Integrating Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with Clinical Risk Factors for Enhanced Prostate Cancer Progression Prediction.整合镓-PSMA-11 PET/CT与临床风险因素以增强前列腺癌进展预测
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;17(14):2285. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142285.
5
Rethinking Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Embracing PrNLMP for Precision and Progress.重新审视Gleason 6级前列腺癌:采用PrNLMP实现精准与进步。
Curr Urol Rep. 2025 Jul 14;26(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01285-1.
6
Defining the Role of Postoperative Radio-Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer.明确术后放射激素治疗在前列腺癌中的作用。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01694-y.
7
Risk factors and risk-stratification model of biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性患者生化复发的危险因素及风险分层模型
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 4;19(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02426-x.
8
Development of a machine learning-based predictive risk model combining fatty acid metabolism and ferroptosis for immunotherapy response and prognosis in prostate cancer.基于机器学习的预测风险模型的开发,该模型结合脂肪酸代谢和铁死亡用于前列腺癌免疫治疗反应及预后评估
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 13;16(1):744. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02484-5.
9
The natural history of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的自然病史。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Aug;19(8):275-281. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.9117.
10
Assessing the influence of prostate tissue traits on Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane-antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography: predictive factors for image positivity and locoregional recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy and without prior or salvage treatment.评估前列腺组织特征对镓-68前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描的影响:接受根治性前列腺切除术且未接受过先前或挽救性治疗的前列腺癌患者图像阳性及局部区域复发的预测因素。
Prostate Int. 2025 Mar;13(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
2
Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌的主要治疗方法的时间趋势和局部变化。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1117-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Prediction models in urology: are they any good, and how would we know anyway?泌尿外科中的预测模型:它们有用吗?无论如何我们又该如何知晓?
Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):571-3; discussion 574. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.026. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
4
Head-to-head comparison of the three most commonly used preoperative models for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.三种最常用的术前模型预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的头对头比较。
Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):562-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
5
Risk assessment among prostate cancer patients receiving primary androgen deprivation therapy.接受初始雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者的风险评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):4306-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5228. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
6
Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis.前列腺癌诊断时转移和死亡的风险评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):878-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp122. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
7
Is there a standard of care for pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer?对于病理分期为T3期的前列腺癌,是否存在护理标准?
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2898-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9460. Epub 2009 May 11.
8
Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial.病理T3N0M0前列腺癌的辅助放疗可显著降低转移风险并提高生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期随访
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
9
Do nomograms predict aggressive recurrence after radical prostatectomy more accurately than biochemical recurrence alone?与仅依据生化复发相比,列线图在预测前列腺癌根治术后侵袭性复发方面是否更准确?
BJU Int. 2009 Mar;103(5):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08118.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools.前列腺癌预测工具的最新目录。
Cancer. 2008 Dec 1;113(11):3075-99. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23908.