Vaudo A D, Stabler D, Patch H M, Tooker J F, Grozinger C M, Wright G A
Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, The Pennsylvania State University, 501 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
J Exp Biol. 2016 Dec 15;219(Pt 24):3962-3970. doi: 10.1242/jeb.140772. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
Bee population declines are linked to the reduction of nutritional resources due to land-use intensification, yet we know little about the specific nutritional needs of many bee species. Pollen provides bees with their primary source of protein and lipids, but nutritional quality varies widely among host-plant species. Therefore, bees might have adapted to assess resource quality and adjust their foraging behavior to balance nutrition from multiple food sources. We tested the ability of two bumble bee species, Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens, to regulate protein and lipid intake. We restricted B. terrestris adults to single synthetic diets varying in protein:lipid ratios (P:L). The bees over-ate protein on low-fat diets and over-ate lipid on high-fat diets to reach their targets of lipid and protein, respectively. The bees survived best on a 10:1 P:L diet; the risk of dying increased as a function of dietary lipid when bees ate diets with lipid contents greater than 5:1 P:L. Hypothesizing that the P:L intake target of adult worker bumble bees was between 25:1 and 5:1, we presented workers from both species with unbalanced but complementary paired diets to determine whether they self-select their diet to reach a specific intake target. Bees consumed similar amounts of proteins and lipids in each treatment and averaged a 14:1 P:L for B. terrestris and 12:1 P:L for B. impatiens These results demonstrate that adult worker bumble bees likely select foods that provide them with a specific ratio of P:L. These P:L intake targets could affect pollen foraging in the field and help explain patterns of host-plant species choice by bumble bees.
蜜蜂种群数量的下降与土地利用集约化导致的营养资源减少有关,但我们对许多蜜蜂物种的具体营养需求知之甚少。花粉是蜜蜂蛋白质和脂质的主要来源,但其营养质量在寄主植物物种间差异很大。因此,蜜蜂可能已经进化出评估资源质量并调整其觅食行为以平衡多种食物来源营养的能力。我们测试了两种熊蜂,即地熊蜂和凤蝶熊蜂调节蛋白质和脂质摄入的能力。我们将地熊蜂成虫限制在蛋白质与脂质比例(P:L)不同的单一合成饮食中。蜜蜂在低脂饮食中过量摄入蛋白质,在高脂饮食中过量摄入脂质,以分别达到它们的脂质和蛋白质目标。蜜蜂在10:1的P:L饮食中存活率最高;当蜜蜂食用脂质含量大于5:1 P:L的饮食时,死亡风险随着饮食脂质含量的增加而增加。假设成年工蜂熊蜂的P:L摄入目标在25:1至5:1之间,我们给这两个物种的工蜂提供不平衡但互补的配对饮食,以确定它们是否会自行选择饮食以达到特定的摄入目标。在每种处理中,蜜蜂消耗的蛋白质和脂质量相似,地熊蜂的平均P:L为14:1,凤蝶熊蜂为12:1。这些结果表明,成年工蜂熊蜂可能会选择能为它们提供特定P:L比例的食物。这些P:L摄入目标可能会影响野外的花粉觅食,并有助于解释熊蜂选择寄主植物物种的模式。