Suppr超能文献

药剂师主导的β-内酰胺类药物过敏访谈对住院患者抗菌治疗的影响:一项试点项目。

Impact of a pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview on inpatient antimicrobial therapy: A pilot project.

作者信息

Sigona Nicholas S, Steele Jeffrey M, Miller Christopher D

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Nov-Dec;56(6):665-669. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of a pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview on antimicrobial therapy.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PRACTICE SETTING

Clarification of beta-lactam allergy may expand treatment options for patients and potentially improve outcomes, reduce toxicity, and reduce costs.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

At our institution, a pilot service using a pharmacy resident and infectious diseases clinical pharmacist was implemented to clarify beta-lactam allergy information and, where appropriate, recommend a change to the patient's antibiotic therapy.

EVALUATION

Adult patients with a documented beta-lactam allergy who had received non-penicillin antibiotics and who had undergone a beta-lactam allergy interview were identified via pharmacy intervention data. A pharmacist interviewed these patients with the use of an internally developed allergy questionnaire. Recommendations for beta-lactam therapy were made to the patient's primary medical team based on the results of the allergy interview and factors including infection type and culture results. The primary objectives were to determine the percentage of patients successfully switched to beta-lactam therapy as a result of the drug allergy interview, to identify allergy discrepancies between the electronic medical record (EMR) and pharmacist's interview, and to quantify the acceptance rate of the pharmacist's antimicrobial recommendations after drug allergy clarification.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were interviewed, and 24 were candidates for a beta-lactam recommendation. As a result of the interview, 21 patients (65.6%) were successfully switched from a non-penicillin antibiotic to a cephalosporin, carbapenem, or penicillin. A discrepancy between the EMR-reported allergy and history obtained on interview was identified in 11 patients (34.4%). Medical providers accepted 87.5% of pharmacists' antimicrobial recommendations.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview was effective in switching eligible patients to beta-lactam therapy and identifying discrepancies between EMR-documented allergies and confirmed allergies. Antimicrobial recommendations were well received by medical providers with a high acceptance rate.

摘要

目的

确定由药剂师主导的β-内酰胺类药物过敏问诊对抗菌治疗的影响。

地点

三级医疗学术医学中心。

实践背景

明确β-内酰胺类药物过敏情况可能会拓宽患者的治疗选择,并有可能改善治疗效果、降低毒性以及减少费用。

实践创新

在我们机构,开展了一项试点服务,由一名药学住院医师和一名传染病临床药师负责,以明确β-内酰胺类药物过敏信息,并在适当情况下建议更改患者的抗生素治疗方案。

评估

通过药学干预数据识别出有β-内酰胺类药物过敏记录、接受过非青霉素类抗生素治疗且接受过β-内酰胺类药物过敏问诊的成年患者。一名药剂师使用内部开发的过敏调查问卷对这些患者进行问诊。根据过敏问诊结果以及感染类型和培养结果等因素,向患者的初级医疗团队提出β-内酰胺类治疗的建议。主要目标是确定因药物过敏问诊而成功转换为β-内酰胺类治疗的患者百分比,识别电子病历(EMR)与药剂师问诊之间的过敏差异,并量化药物过敏明确后药剂师抗菌建议的接受率。

结果

共对32名患者进行了问诊,其中24名患者适合接受β-内酰胺类药物推荐。问诊后,21名患者(65.6%)成功从非青霉素类抗生素转换为头孢菌素、碳青霉烯类或青霉素类药物。11名患者(34.4%)被发现电子病历报告的过敏情况与问诊获得的病史存在差异。医疗服务提供者接受了87.5%的药剂师抗菌建议。

结论

由药剂师主导的β-内酰胺类药物过敏问诊在将符合条件的患者转换为β-内酰胺类治疗以及识别电子病历记录的过敏与确诊过敏之间的差异方面是有效的。药剂师的抗菌建议获得了医疗服务提供者的高度认可,接受率很高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验