• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术抗低血压技术的评估:快速晶体液输注与静脉注射麻黄碱对比

Evaluation of antihypotensive techniques for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Rapid crystalloid hydration versus intravenous ephedrine.

作者信息

Kulkarni Kalpana Rajendra, Naik Amruta Girish, Deshpande Sunetra Girish

机构信息

Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, D Y Patil Medical College, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):637-642. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.191118.

DOI:10.4103/0259-1162.191118
PMID:27746565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5062204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia is a preferred technique over general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. It avoids maternal airway related complications, aspiration and neonatal depression. However hypotension following spinal anesthesia can lead to decrease in uterine blood flow and neonatal hypoxia.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 15 mL.kg- 1of crystalloid preloading versus prophylactic intravenous bolus of 10 mg ephedrine as an antihypotensive measure for cesarean section.

METHODS

A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted in hundred ASA grade I/II parturient undergoing cesarean section, allocated to group (=50) who received preloading with ringer lactate 15 mL.kg- 1 over 20 minutes before spinal anesthesia and group E (=50) received intravenous bolus of 10mg ephedrine within one minute of spinal anesthesia with 10mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% at L2-3/L3-4 level. They were monitored for incidences of hypotension, need of rescue doses of ephedrine, Apgar score and adverse events. Appropriate statistical tests were applied and < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

Incidence of hypotension within 20 minutes of spinal anesthesia was significantly less in group E (28%) as compared to group (58%) and need of rescue doses were more in group P. Adverse events like nausea vomiting and shivering were less in group E. Apgar score were better in group E than in group delivered babies.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic intravenous bolus of 10mg ephedrine with spinal injection is more effective in maintaining maternal hemodynamic stability and better neonatal outcome as compared to crystalloid preloading during cesarean delivery.

摘要

背景

剖宫产时,脊髓麻醉是比全身麻醉更优选的技术。它可避免与产妇气道相关的并发症、误吸和新生儿抑制。然而,脊髓麻醉后低血压可导致子宫血流减少和新生儿缺氧。

目的

我们旨在评估15 mL·kg⁻¹晶体液预负荷与预防性静脉推注10 mg麻黄碱作为剖宫产抗低血压措施的疗效。

方法

对100例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I/II级剖宫产产妇进行前瞻性随机双盲研究,分为P组(n = 50),在脊髓麻醉前20分钟内接受15 mL·kg⁻¹乳酸林格液预负荷;E组(n = 50),在L2 - 3/L3 - 4水平用0.5%重比重布比卡因10 mg进行脊髓麻醉后1分钟内接受静脉推注10 mg麻黄碱。监测两组低血压发生率、麻黄碱抢救剂量需求、阿氏评分及不良事件。应用适当的统计学检验,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

脊髓麻醉后20分钟内,E组低血压发生率(28%)显著低于P组(58%),且P组麻黄碱抢救剂量需求更多。E组恶心呕吐和寒战等不良事件较少。E组分娩的婴儿阿氏评分优于P组。

结论

剖宫产时,与晶体液预负荷相比,脊髓注射时预防性静脉推注10 mg麻黄碱在维持产妇血流动力学稳定和改善新生儿结局方面更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/7934e7ffa957/AER-10-637-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/6caed84862bb/AER-10-637-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/be02e2658852/AER-10-637-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/7934e7ffa957/AER-10-637-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/6caed84862bb/AER-10-637-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/be02e2658852/AER-10-637-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a1/5062204/7934e7ffa957/AER-10-637-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of antihypotensive techniques for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Rapid crystalloid hydration versus intravenous ephedrine.脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术抗低血压技术的评估:快速晶体液输注与静脉注射麻黄碱对比
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):637-642. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.191118.
2
Comparison between colloid preload and crystalloid co-load in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.脊髓麻醉下剖宫产中胶体预负荷与晶体联合负荷的比较:一项随机对照试验
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Nov;23(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
3
Colloid preloading versus crystalloid preloading to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.胶体预充与晶体预充预防剖宫产脊麻后低血压的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 19;100(7):e24607. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024607.
4
[Ephedrine vs. phenylephrine by intravenous bolus and continuous infusion to prevent hypotension secondary to spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized comparative trial].[剖宫产术中静脉推注和持续输注麻黄碱与去氧肾上腺素预防脊髓麻醉所致低血压的随机对照试验]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011 Aug-Sep;58(7):412-6. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(11)70104-9.
5
Effects of fluid preload (crystalloid or colloid) compared with crystalloid co-load plus ephedrine infusion on hypotension and neonatal outcome during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery.与晶体预负荷加麻黄碱输注相比,晶体预负荷(晶体液或胶体液)对剖宫产脊髓麻醉期间低血压和新生儿结局的影响。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Jul;38(4):647-53. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800337.
6
A randomized double-blind study comparing prophylactic norepinephrine and ephedrine infusion for preventing maternal spinal hypotension during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A CONSORT-compliant article.一项比较预防性输注去甲肾上腺素和麻黄碱以预防脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产术中产妇脊髓低血压的随机双盲研究:一篇符合CONSORT标准的文章。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(51):e18311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018311.
7
Prevention of post-spinal hypotension using crystalloid, colloid and ephedrine with three different combinations: A double blind randomized study.使用晶体液、胶体液和麻黄碱三种不同组合预防脊柱麻醉后低血压:一项双盲随机研究。
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:36. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.100129. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Spinal anesthesia with sequential administration of plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine provides satisfactory analgesia with hemodynamic stability in cesarean section.在剖宫产手术中,序贯给予普通布比卡因和重比重布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉可提供满意的镇痛效果且血流动力学稳定。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008 Jul;17(3):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.11.007. Epub 2008 May 21.
9
Combined Colloid Preload and Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.胶体预负荷联合晶体液负荷与晶体液负荷在剖宫产脊髓麻醉中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Feb;128(2):304-312. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003306.
10
Comparison of intravenous ephedrine with phenylephrine for the maintenance of arterial blood pressure during elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产术中静脉注射麻黄碱与去氧肾上腺素维持动脉血压的比较。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2010 Mar;39(1):13-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of different doses of ephedrine spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and adverse reactions in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.不同剂量麻黄碱脊髓麻醉对经尿道前列腺切除术患者血流动力学及不良反应的影响
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01880-x.
2
Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Dobutamine and Ephedrine Infusions in Isoflurane-Anesthetized Horses.异氟烷麻醉马中多巴酚丁胺和麻黄碱输注的血流动力学效应比较
Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 6;10(4):278. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040278.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-loading or pre-loading for prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia! a therapeutic dilemma.联合负荷或预负荷预防脊髓麻醉后低血压!一个治疗难题。
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 May-Aug;7(2):155-9. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.118943.
2
Comparison of Prophylactic Infusion of Phenylephrine with Ephedrine for Prevention of Hypotension in Elective Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesi: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产中预防性输注去氧肾上腺素与麻黄碱预防低血压的比较:一项随机临床试验
Iran J Med Sci. 2015 Jan;40(1):19-26.
3
Vasopressors in obstetric anesthesia: A current perspective.
剖宫产脊髓麻醉中预防性使用去甲肾上腺素和去氧肾上腺素的疗效及安全性比较:一项采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1015325. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1015325. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine boluses for the treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section - A randomised controlled trial.去甲肾上腺素与去氧肾上腺素推注用于剖宫产脊髓麻醉期间低血压治疗的比较——一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;63(12):995-1000. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_481_19. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
产科麻醉中的血管活性药物:当前观点
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):58-64. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.58.
4
Preventing spinal hypotension during Caesarean delivery: what is the latest?剖宫产术中预防脊髓性低血压:最新进展如何?
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Feb;114(2):183-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu267. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
5
A comparison of three vasopressors for tight control of maternal blood pressure during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Effect on maternal and fetal outcome.三种血管升压药在脊麻下剖宫产术中严格控制产妇血压的比较:对母婴结局的影响。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;29(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.105789.
6
Prevention of post-spinal hypotension using crystalloid, colloid and ephedrine with three different combinations: A double blind randomized study.使用晶体液、胶体液和麻黄碱三种不同组合预防脊柱麻醉后低血压:一项双盲随机研究。
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:36. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.100129. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
7
Vasopressors for the management of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section. Systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.血管加压药治疗择期剖宫产脊髓麻醉后低血压的管理。系统评价和累积荟萃分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Aug;56(7):810-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02646.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
8
Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section.预防剖宫产术后区域麻醉后产妇低血压。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):304-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328337ffc6.
9
The effects of intravenous ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.静脉注射麻黄碱在剖宫产脊髓麻醉中的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Oct;24(5):883-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.5.883. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
10
Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration.剖宫产脊髓麻醉期间低血压的预防:使用去氧肾上腺素输注联合晶体液预充的有效技术
Anesthesiology. 2005 Oct;103(4):744-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200510000-00012.