Garcia Filho Sergio Grandisoli, de Andrade Felipe Silveira Rego Monteiro, Dos Santos Rosana Souza Thurler, Gonçalves Lucas Alaião, Pereira Marco Aurélio Amador, de Souza Anderson Fernando, Ambrósio Aline Magalhães, Fantoni Denise Tabacchi
Department of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, 87 Professor Orlando Marques Paiva Ave., São Paulo 05508-270, SP, Brazil.
Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 6;10(4):278. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040278.
The objective of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of dobutamine and ephedrine during the management of anesthesia-related hypotension in healthy horses. Thirteen horses underwent general anesthesia with isoflurane and were randomly divided into two different groups, one of which received a dobutamine constant rate infusion (CRI) (1 µg/kg bwt/min) and the other received an ephedrine CRI (20 µg/kg bwt/min) when hypotension (<60 mmHg) was identified, following up to 15 min after the blood pressure reached 70 mmHg. All horses were equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter and a peripheral artery catheter, and multiparameter monitoring commenced as soon as they were under mechanical ventilation. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded, while tissue perfusion markers (peripheral oxygen saturation, arterial oxygen partial pressure, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure, arterial pH, arterial plasma bicarbonate concentration, arterial oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen content, arterial oxygen content, arteriovenous oxygen difference, oxygen delivery index, oxygen consumption index, and oxygen extraction ratio), serum lactate concentration, and troponin I concentrations were analyzed before the start of infusions (T0), when the blood pressure reached 70 mmHg (T1), and 15 min after T1 (T2). The time to restore the arterial pressure was similar in both groups ( > 0.05); however, the heart rate was higher in the ephedrine group ( = 0.0098), and sinus bradyarrhythmia occurred in the dobutamine group. Furthermore, both experimental protocols increased cardiac output ( = 0.0012), cardiac index ( = 0.0013), systemic vascular resistance ( = 0.008), systemic vascular resistance index ( < 0.001), and ameliorated perfusion markers. In the dobutamine group, the pulmonary artery wedge pressure ( < 0.001) and systolic index ( = 0.003) were elevated, while the arteriovenous oxygen difference was reduced in the ephedrine group ( = 0.02). Troponin I was used as a myocardial injury indicator, and did not differ between moments or between groups ( > 0.05). We concluded that both drugs were effective and safe to treat anesthetic hypotension under the conditions of this study.
本研究的目的是比较多巴酚丁胺和麻黄碱在健康马匹麻醉相关低血压处理过程中的血流动力学效应。13匹马接受异氟烷全身麻醉,并随机分为两组,一组在低血压(<60 mmHg)被识别时接受多巴酚丁胺持续输注(CRI)(1µg/kg体重/分钟),另一组接受麻黄碱CRI(20µg/kg体重/分钟),血压达到70 mmHg后随访15分钟。所有马匹均配备肺动脉导管和外周动脉导管,一旦处于机械通气状态,便开始多参数监测。记录血流动力学参数,同时在输注开始前(T0)、血压达到70 mmHg时(T1)以及T1后15分钟(T2)分析组织灌注指标(外周血氧饱和度、动脉血氧分压、动脉血二氧化碳分压、动脉血pH值、动脉血浆碳酸氢盐浓度、动脉血氧饱和度、混合静脉血氧饱和度、混合静脉血氧含量、动脉血氧含量、动静脉血氧差、氧输送指数、氧消耗指数和氧摄取率)、血清乳酸浓度和肌钙蛋白I浓度。两组恢复动脉压的时间相似(>0.05);然而,麻黄碱组心率较高(=0.0098),多巴酚丁胺组出现窦性心动过缓。此外,两种实验方案均增加了心输出量(=0.0012)、心脏指数(=0.0013)、全身血管阻力(=0.008)、全身血管阻力指数(<0.001),并改善了灌注指标。在多巴酚丁胺组,肺动脉楔压(<0.001)和收缩指数(=0.003)升高,而麻黄碱组动静脉血氧差降低(=0.02)。肌钙蛋白I用作心肌损伤指标,在各时间点或各组之间无差异(>0.05)。我们得出结论,在本研究条件下,两种药物治疗麻醉性低血压均有效且安全。