• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重风险与长效支气管扩张剂治疗:三种观察性数据分析方法的比较

Severe COPD Exacerbation Risk and Long-Acting Bronchodilator Treatments: Comparison of Three Observational Data Analysis Methods.

作者信息

Roberts Melissa H, Mapel Douglas W, Borrego Matthew E, Raisch Dennis W, Georgopoulos Larry, van der Goes David

机构信息

Health Services Research Division, LCF Research, 2309 Renard Place SE, Suite 103, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.

College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Jun;2(2):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0025-6.

DOI:10.1007/s40801-015-0025-6
PMID:27747765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4883193/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Results from three observational methods for assessing effectiveness of long-acting bronchodilator therapies for reducing severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were compared: intent-to-treat (ITT), as protocol (AP), and an as-treated analysis that utilized a marginal structural model (MSM) incorporating time-varying covariates related to treatment adherence and moderate exacerbations.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Severe exacerbation risk was assessed over a 2-year period using claims data for patients aged ≥40 years who initiated long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA), or triple therapy (LAMA + ICS/LABA).

RESULTS

A total of 5475 COPD patients met inclusion criteria. Six months post-initiation, 53.5 % of patients discontinued using any therapy. The ITT analysis found an increased severe exacerbation risk for triple therapy treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.53). No increased risk was found in the AP (HR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.73-1.36), or MSM analyses (HR 1.11; 95 % CI 0.68-1.81). The MSM highlighted important associations among post-index events.

CONCLUSION

Neglecting to adjust for treatment discontinuation may produce biased risk estimates. The MSM approach is a promising tool to compare chronic disease management by illuminating relationships between treatment decisions, adherence, patient choices, and outcomes.

摘要

目的

比较三种观察性方法评估长效支气管扩张剂疗法减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)严重加重发作有效性的结果:意向性分析(ITT)、按方案分析(AP)以及采用纳入与治疗依从性和中度加重发作相关的随时间变化协变量的边际结构模型(MSM)的实际治疗分析。

研究设计与设置

使用年龄≥40岁开始使用长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)、吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)或三联疗法(LAMA + ICS/LABA)患者的理赔数据,在2年期间评估严重加重发作风险。

结果

共有5475例COPD患者符合纳入标准。开始治疗6个月后,53.5%的患者停止使用任何疗法。ITT分析发现三联疗法治疗的严重加重发作风险增加(风险比[HR] 1.24;95%置信区间[CI] 1.00 - 1.53)。在AP分析(HR 1.00;95% CI 0.73 - 1.36)或MSM分析(HR 1.11;95% CI 0.68 - 1.81)中未发现风险增加。MSM突出了索引后事件之间的重要关联。

结论

忽略对治疗中断进行调整可能会产生有偏差的风险估计。MSM方法是一种很有前景的工具,通过阐明治疗决策、依从性、患者选择和结果之间的关系来比较慢性病管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d24/4883193/684ca5113fab/40801_2015_25_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d24/4883193/8efef2d0b2c4/40801_2015_25_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d24/4883193/684ca5113fab/40801_2015_25_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d24/4883193/8efef2d0b2c4/40801_2015_25_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d24/4883193/684ca5113fab/40801_2015_25_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Severe COPD Exacerbation Risk and Long-Acting Bronchodilator Treatments: Comparison of Three Observational Data Analysis Methods.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重风险与长效支气管扩张剂治疗:三种观察性数据分析方法的比较
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015 Jun;2(2):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0025-6.
2
Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入性皮质类固醇联合吸入长效β2-激动剂和长效抗胆碱能药物治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub3.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Beta -Agonist Combined with a Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist or Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.长效β受体激动剂联合长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂或吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较疗效
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Apr;37(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/phar.1913.
4
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
5
Overuse of long-acting β-agonist/inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: time to rethink prescribing patterns.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者长效β受体激动剂/吸入性糖皮质激素的过度使用:是时候重新思考处方模式了。
Postgrad Med. 2023 Nov;135(8):784-802. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2284650. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
6
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Different Types of Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist vs Inhaled Long-Acting β-Agonist Plus Inhaled Corticosteroid Fixed-Dose Combinations in COPD A Propensity Score-Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Cohort Study.不同类型的长效β激动剂加长效抗胆碱能药物与长效β激动剂加吸入性皮质类固醇固定剂量联合治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性比较:一项倾向评分逆概率治疗加权队列研究。
Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1255-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.025. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Comparative Effects of LAMA-LABA-ICS vs LAMA-LABA for COPD: Cohort Study in Real-World Clinical Practice.LAMA-LABA-ICS 与 LAMA-LABA 治疗 COPD 的对比效果:真实世界临床实践中的队列研究。
Chest. 2020 Apr;157(4):846-855. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting β-Agonist in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Primary Care Setting in England.在英国初级保健环境中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Apr 19;18:643-659. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S405498. eCollection 2023.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate versus Other Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗与其他三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3089-3112. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01703-z. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Initiation of Triple Therapy with Multiple Inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns from a U.S. Retrospective Database Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中多种吸入器三联疗法的启动:来自美国回顾性数据库研究的治疗模式分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Nov;24(11):1165-1172. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.11.1165.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Causal Analysis of the Effects of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Versus No Long-Acting Bronchodilator Use on Readmission or Mortality After Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂与不使用长效支气管扩张剂对慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院后再入院或死亡率影响的比较因果分析
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Mar;7(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-00171-w.
2
A retrospective study to assess clinical characteristics and time to initiation of open-triple therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, newly established on long-acting mono- or combination therapy.一项回顾性研究,旨在评估新开始接受长效单药或联合治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床特征及开始三联开放治疗的时间。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jun 21;12:1825-1836. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S129007. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of marginal structural models in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review.边际结构模型在药物流行病学研究中的应用:一项系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):560-71. doi: 10.1002/pds.3569. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Subtle issues in model specification and estimation of marginal structural models.边缘结构模型的模型规范和估计中的细微问题。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Mar;21(3):241-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.2306. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Observational study on the impact of initiating tiotropium alone versus tiotropium with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy on outcomes and costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
观察性研究:噻托溴铵单药治疗与噻托溴铵/丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗复方制剂联合治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病结局和成本的影响。
Respir Res. 2012 Feb 17;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-15.
4
Extension of Kaplan-Meier methods in observational studies with time-varying treatment.在具有时变治疗的观察性研究中扩展 Kaplan-Meier 方法。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
5
The impact of tiotropium on mortality and exacerbations when added to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonist therapy in COPD.噻托溴铵对 COPD 患者吸入皮质激素和长效β-受体激动剂治疗时的死亡率和加重的影响。
Chest. 2012 Jan;141(1):81-86. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0038. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
6
Differences between marginal structural models and conventional models in their exposure effect estimates: a systematic review.边缘结构模型与传统模型在暴露效应估计中的差异:系统评价。
Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):586-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d0507.
7
Medication adherence: WHO cares?药物依从性:谁在乎?
Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Apr;86(4):304-14. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0575. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
8
Identifying and characterizing COPD patients in US managed care. A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of administrative claims data.确定并描述美国管理式医疗中的 COPD 患者。基于行政索赔数据的回顾性、横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb 23;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-43.
9
Marginal Structural Models: unbiased estimation for longitudinal studies.边缘结构模型:纵向研究的无偏估计。
Int J Public Health. 2011 Feb;56(1):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0198-4. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
10
Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.因果推断的匹配方法:综述与展望
Stat Sci. 2010 Feb 1;25(1):1-21. doi: 10.1214/09-STS313.